Post#727:
Dismissing curved space(time?) at a conceptual level, requires demonstrating the reasons for doing that
within the context of non Euclidean geometry. Its up to
you demonstrate this.
Even if you were to attempt to actually put in the effort, I'm pretty sure you'd fail even on the simpler analogy you gave of 'square circles'. Eg: One might argue that a square has four sides and four vertices, whereas a circle has either
no sides and
no vertices
or an infinite number of both, depending on a typically the context of that discussion.
Thus far, the only context you have given in this entire thread, appears to be your own personal, rather ill-informed notions of what appeals to you (eg: 'what reality is')?