This is human logic. but what I posted was the actual words of a God that cannot lie and whose "gifts and calling" "are irrevocable." (Romans 11:29)
Genesis 17:12 is "human logic"?
Faith and obedience are "human logic"?
Last edited:
Upvote
0
This is human logic. but what I posted was the actual words of a God that cannot lie and whose "gifts and calling" "are irrevocable." (Romans 11:29)
This is human logic. but what I posted was the actual words of a God that cannot lie and whose "gifts and calling" "are irrevocable." (Romans 11:29)
Genesis 17:12 is indeed the truth f God. But the application YOU made of it is mere human logic.
Those in Abraham's household that were not his descendants were also to be circumcised.So then, explain the application of Genesis 17:12 according to YOUR mere human logic.
In particular, explain what "not of thy seed" means.
Where does scripture teach that salvation will one day be dependent on someone's nationality? Will God suddenly stop not being a respecter of persons at some point?There has never been a time when ANY individual could not repent and be blessed by God. But our God has promised that, in a day that is still in the future, He will bring ALL of that ancient and rebellious nation to repentance.
What you say that we are supposedly EXPLICITLY told in scripture is only your interpretation of those scripture passages whether you acknowledge that or not.And it is only after these purgings that ALL Israel will be saved, as we are EXPLICITLY told in Romans 11:26, Isaiah 4:3-4 and Zechariah 12:10-14.
How do you interpret this passage:Those in Abraham's household that were not his descendants were also to be circumcised.
But THAT has nothing to do with the many EXPLICITLY STATED promises to the "seed of Abraham," to the ancient nation of "Israel," to the two ancient sub-nations of "Ephraim and Judah," to each the twelve tribes of Israel by name, to "the mountains of Israel, along with "the hills, the rivers, the valleys, the desolate wastes, and the cities that have been forsaken, which became plunder and mockery to the rest of the nations all around" whose borders are specified in high detail, to the city of "Jerusalem," and to the descendants of several ancient Israelites.
There are indeed scriptures that CAN be INTERPRETED to mean that "the seed of Abraham," "Israel," and possibly even "Jerusalem" can also refer to "the church," although there is not even one scripture that actually says any of those. But there is no scripture that even SEEMS to justify interpreting any of these other names to mean "the church."
Spiritual Jew, I would say fit your understanding who is Israel to Ezekiel 38 and 39, because those end times chapters are about a nation fitting a geographic location. Not a theological position.Where does scripture teach that salvation will one day be dependent on someone's nationality? Will God suddenly stop not being a respecter of persons at some point?
Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: 35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.
Why would God ensure that people of the nation of Israel would one day all be saved but not the people of any other nation? That idea contradicts the fact that He is not a respecter of persons. You don't seem to understand that you are interpreting some scripture passages in such a way that blatantly contradicts other scripture passages.
What you say that we are supposedly EXPLICITLY told in scripture is only your interpretation of those scripture passages whether you acknowledge that or not.
Which Israel are you talking about here? Can you tell me how you interpret this passage:
Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
There are two Israels mentioned here. Not all of those in the second Israel mentioned in Romans 9:6 are part of the first Israel mentioned. To be part of the first Israel has nothing to do one's nationality or being a natural descendant of Abraham. Instead, it's made up of those who are the children of God and children of the promise.
Where does scripture teach that salvation will one day be dependent on someone's nationality?
Why would God ensure that people of the nation of Israel would one day all be saved but not the people of any other nation? That idea contradicts the fact that He is not a respecter of persons. You don't seem to understand that you are interpreting some scripture passages in such a way that blatantly contradicts other scripture passages.
What you say that we are supposedly EXPLICITLY told in scripture is only your interpretation of those scripture passages whether you acknowledge that or not.
YOU are INTERPRETING this scripture in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to the explanation the HOLY SPIRIT inspired Paul to write:Which Israel are you talking about here? Can you tell me how you interpret this passage:
Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
There are two Israels mentioned here. Not all of those in the second Israel mentioned in Romans 9:6 are part of the first Israel mentioned. To be part of the first Israel has nothing to do one's nationality or being a natural descendant of Abraham. Instead, it's made up of those who are the children of God and children of the promise.
I said:Where does scripture teach that salvation will one day be dependent on someone's nationality?
Yes, you most certainly did. Let me remind you again of what you said:Nowhere, and I did not even imply that scripture teaches any such thing.
You are saying that God will lead the entire nation of Israel to repentance. Do you think He will do that for any other nation? I'm sure you don't. So, that means you are saying that one's nationality, in this case Israel, has a major bearing on their salvation. How can you try to deny this?Biblewriter previously said:But our God has promised that, in a day that is still in the future, He will bring ALL of that ancient and rebellious nation to repentance.
All scripture has to be interpreted and must be spiritually discerned (1 Cor 2:9-14). The idea that any scripture doesn't need to be interpreted is ridiculous. Again, you are sharing your INTERPRETATIONS, but are apparently too prideful to acknowledge that.The truth is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you are saying. YOU are the one who is INTERPRETING some scriptures to MEAN something they DO NOT ACTUALLY SAY, and you are using YOUR INTERPRETATION of the MEANINGS of those scriptures as an excuse to deny what other scriptures EXPLICITLY say. What I posted was NOT interpretation. It was what the Bible EXPLICITLY says. And it not only EXPLICITLY says it, but it REPEATEDLY says it in PLAIN, CLEAR, words.
You apparently did not read Romans 9:6-8 very carefully. Let's look at it again.YOU are INTERPRETING this scripture in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to the explanation the HOLY SPIRIT inspired Paul to write:
9 For this is the word of promise: "At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son."
10 And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac
11 (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls),
12 it was said to her, "The older shall serve the younger."
13 As it is written, "Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated." Romans 9:9-13
That is, the Holy Spirit explained that He did not mean that the true Israel was a different group from the physical Israel, but rather, that the true Israel was only that portion of the natural Israel that was also the seed that had been promised.
And so, after two chapters of reasoning, the Holy Spirit finally came down to the plain statement, concerning the unbelieving portion of Israel, that:
28 Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.
29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. Romans 11:28-29
So, for you, Ezekiel 38 and 39 trumps Romans 9:6-8? You are trying to set one scripture against another. No. They should agree. Paul is very clear about who makes up the spiritual Israel of God. I would say that you need to read the New Testament more and allow it to aid your understanding of the Old Testament.Spiritual Jew, I would say fit your understanding who is Israel to Ezekiel 38 and 39, because those end times chapters are about a nation fitting a geographic location. Not a theological position.
At the time of Romans 9:6-8, the Jews, Israel had not yet gone into the 2000 year dispersion into the nations, nor the temple and city destroyed as part of the Daniel 9:26 prophecy.So, for you, Ezekiel 38 and 39 trumps Romans 9:6-8? You are trying to set one scripture against another. No. They should agree. Paul is very clear about who makes up the spiritual Israel of God. I would say that you need to read the New Testament more and allow it to aid your understanding of the Old Testament.
Nowhere, and I did not even imply that scripture teaches any such thing.
The truth is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you are saying. YOU are the one who is INTERPRETING some scriptures to MEAN something they DO NOT ACTUALLY SAY, and you are using YOUR INTERPRETATION of the MEANINGS of those scriptures as an excuse to deny what other scriptures EXPLICITLY say. What I posted was NOT interpretation. It was what the Bible EXPLICITLY says. And it not only EXPLICITLY says it, but it REPEATEDLY says it in PLAIN, CLEAR, words.
YOU are INTERPRETING this scripture in DIRECT CONTRADICTION to the explanation the HOLY SPIRIT inspired Paul to write:
9 For this is the word of promise: "At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son."
10 And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac
11 (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls),
12 it was said to her, "The older shall serve the younger."
13 As it is written, "Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated." Romans 9:9-13
That is, the Holy Spirit explained that He did not mean that the true Israel was a different group from the physical Israel, but rather, that the true Israel was only that portion of the natural Israel that was also the seed that had been promised.
And so, after two chapters of reasoning, the Holy Spirit finally came down to the plain statement, concerning the unbelieving portion of Israel, that:
28 Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.
29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. Romans 11:28-29
Yes, you most certainly did. Let me remind you again of what you said:
You are saying that God will lead the entire nation of Israel to repentance. Do you think He will do that for any other nation? I'm sure you don't. So, that means you are saying that one's nationality, in this case Israel, has a major bearing on their salvation. How can you try to deny this?
But many among the children of Israel are rebels, and God cannot have rebels in his presence. So the scriptures explicitly tell us how He will deal with that.
“As I live, says the Lord GOD, surely with a mighty hand, with an outstretched arm, and with fury poured out, I will rule over you. I will bring you out from the peoples and gather you out of the countries where you are scattered, with a mighty hand, with an outstretched arm, and with fury poured out. And I will bring you into the wilderness of the peoples, and there I will plead My case with you face to face. Just as I pleaded My case with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt, so I will plead My case with you, says the Lord GOD. I will make you pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant; I will purge the rebels from among you, and those who transgress against Me; I will bring them out of the country where they dwell, but they shall not enter the land of Israel. Then you will know that I am the Lord.” (Ezekiel 20:33-38)
So although there will be rebels among those that will be brought back to the land, God himself will meet them at the border as they arrive, and purge these rebels from among the people. And it explicitly says concerning these rebels that, “I will bring them out of the country where they dwell, but they shall not enter the land of Israel.”
Again,ll be beautiful and glorious; And the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and appealing For those of Israel WHO HAVE ESCAPED. And it shall come to pass that he WHO IS LEFT in Zion and REMAINS in Jerusalem will be called holy everyone who is recorded among the living in Jerusalem. WHEN the Lord has washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, and purged the blood of Jerusalem from her midst, by the spirit of judgment and by the spirit of burning.” (Isaiah 4:2-5)
Again, we read of that time, “But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. No more shall every man teach his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord, for they all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.” (Jeremiah 31:33-34) This is so important that the Holy Spirit quoted it in Hebrews 8:10-11.
-----------
All scripture has to be interpreted and must be spiritually discerned (1 Cor 2:9-14). The idea that any scripture doesn't need to be interpreted is ridiculous. Again, you are sharing your INTERPRETATIONS, but are apparently too prideful to acknowledge that.
You apparently did not read Romans 9:6-8 very carefully. Let's look at it again.
Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Notice that it says being children of the flesh (natural Israelites) is not a factor in being a child of God. Instead, the children of the promise are counted for the seed. Using scripture to interpret scripture, we can determine who the children of God and of the promise are.
I have highlighted in boldfaced red that part of this statement that is 100% pure INTERPRETATION on your part. Not even ONE scripture actually SAYS any of that.Galatians 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
One is a child of God and of the promise "by faith in Christ Jesus". That is who makes up the Israel of which not all of the nation of Israel are part. Spiritual Israel is made up of Christians, both Jew and Gentile. That is the Israel of which all are and will be saved. That is the Israel that Paul is talking about in Romans 11:26. By saying that God will ensure that all of the nation of Israel will be saved then you make God out to be a respecter of persons since you don't believe He will do that for any other nation.
You cannot provide even one scripture that actually SAYS that faith in Christ makes a person an Israelite. You are ASSUMING that being a child of Abraham by faith makes someone an Israelite. But you cannot demonstrate this from scripture.Two Israels.
Romans 9
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
1. Of Israel:
Not all Israel
The children of the flesh
Not the children of God
Not the children of the promise
Not counted for the seed
2. All Israel:
Not of Israel
Not the children of the flesh
The children of God
The children of the promise
Counted for the seed
Only one of these Israels shall be saved.
Romans 11
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Only the faithful obedient "all Israel", comprised of the believing elect beloved remnant of Israel (Romans 9:27; 11:1-5,26,28), and believers from among the Gentiles (Romans 11:11), shall be saved.
The true significance of God's choice of Isaac had nothing to do with genetics, and everything to do with faith and obedience. Isaac was the "child of promise", a product of the faith and obedience of his parents Abraham and Sarah. Faith, because both Abraham and Sarah believed God's promise that Abraham would sire a son even though both of them were well beyond the point of physical capability. (Hebrews 11:11-12) Obedience, because Abraham was willing to obey God's instructions to sacrifice Isaac, in apparent violation of His own promise. Yet in further faith he obeyed to the point where God's intervention was elicited. (Hebrews 11:17-19). God's response was to honor all three of them by choosing Isaac's lineage to be that through which Messiah would come.
Hebrews 11
8 By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went.
11 Through faith also Sara herself received strength to conceive seed, and was delivered of a child when she was past age, because she judged him faithful who had promised.
12 Therefore sprang there even of one, and him as good as dead, so many as the stars of the sky in multitude, and as the sand which is by the sea shore innumerable.
17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son,
18 Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called:
19 Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.
We then further see Isaac, the "child of promise", continue his parents' spiritual legacy to also become a spiritual progenitor of those of faith and obedience in and to Christ -- His Church -- His "children of promise" heirs:
Romans 9:7-8
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Galatians 4:28
Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
Galatians 3:29
And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Romans 8:16-17
16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:
17 And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ.
Thus Isaac, in the full tradition of his parents Abraham and Sarah, continued their legacies of faith and obedience, to the benefit of us all who follow in their spiritual footsteps.
Faith and obedience.
Spiritual DNA.
God's sole and exclusive Covenant conditions.
And nothing else.
You cannot provide even one scripture that actually SAYS that faith in Christ makes a person an Israelite. You are ASSUMING that being a child of Abraham by faith makes someone an Israelite. But you cannot demonstrate this from scripture.
Again, you are ASSUMING that there are two Israels spoken of in scripture. But you cannot quote even one scripture that actually SAYS this. All you can do is quote scriptures that you CHOOSE to INTERPRET to MEAN this.
While the scriptures indeed teach, and CLEARLY teach, that it is only through faith that a person can become a child of God. They NEVER, even once, say that ANYONE is an Israelite other than a physical descendant of the ancient nation of Israel.
The point of this thread is to demonstrate, from EXPLICITLY STATED scripture, that, after the Lord returns, He will indeed gather absolutely all of the physical descendants of the ancient nation of Israel back into their ancient homeland, and, after purging the rebels from their midst, bring ABSOLUTELY ALL of them that remain to a true and living faith in Himself. And the scriptures indeed EXPLICITLY say this, and they ACTUALLY say it in CLEAR, PLAIN words.
I did not state an opinion, but an undeniable fact.Feel free to attempt to refute what I've provided.
With Scripture, instead of only your opinions.
And don't ignore Galatians 3:16,28-29.
I did not state an opinion, but an undeniable fact.
You cannot post even one quotation, from anywhere in the entire Bible, that actually says that any person who is not a physical descendant of Jacob, who was re-named Israel, is an Israelite. This is PURE interpretation on your part.
Again, I did not state an OPINION. I stated a HARD FACT. The Bible simply DOES NOT say that "the church" is Israel. And it DOES NOT say that anyone who is not a physical descendant of the ancient nation of Israel is an Israelite.Repeat:
Feel free to attempt to refute what I've provided.
With Scripture, instead of only your opinions.
And don't ignore Galatians 3:16,28-29.
Ezekiel 38-39 is not scripture? Israel in those chapters is a physical location, not a theological position.Repeat:
Feel free to attempt to refute what I've provided.
With Scripture, instead of only your opinions.
And don't ignore Galatians 3:16,28-29.