But the problem I have is the "I believe" the election was stolen really is just not an argument. There is no hard data. No hard facts. Dozens of judges, most of whom were Trump-appointed, threw out these accusations of fraud and they were summarily rejected. It's not as if all these far left liberals dumped the cases trying to hide something. These conservative judges jettisoned these accusations as nonsense. They were so absurd that they were not even taken to a hearing.
Where do we hear all this fraud from? A pillow manufacturer? A hysterical lawyer claiming she's going to "unleash the Kracken?" Rudy Giuliani? There was just no evidence. Vice President Pence felt there was nothing there, and he truly had a stake in all this.
I can't stand Kamala Harris!!! I cannot fathom how much I detest Joe Biden. I loathed Biden back in the days of him going after Judge Thomas and Bork and the gang! Harris got to where she is through bed-hopping. These two are absolutely vile to me. I voted twice for Trump. That said, I don't see any evidence that Trump had the rug pulled out from underneath him.
Here's how I do see it....and if this is derailing this thread, then so be it. The OP can jump on my case for it, but I think politics is at the heart of this thread. Everything now is political, parishes aren't immune. Far more Americans are Democrats than Republicans. It's just a fact. Tons of registered Democrats. For years, the best friend of Republican operatives is APATHY on the left. Fact is Republicans often times come out with more zeal to vote despite their slightly smaller numbers. While they are somewhat larger in size, the Democratic voters do not come out with much passion and vote. Obama was an exception because of the historic possibilities of that election in itself. Normally, Democrats are less mobilized. And Republicans have been known to work out their own voter suppression----not allowing folks with P.O. boxes to vote.....hmmmm....so Native Americans get turned away in the 11th hour. Ballot harvesting in the Georgia election for governor was rampant and Stacy Abrams, not a person I care for in the least, lost. While I dislike her politics, I do believe her opponent used nefarious means to defeat her based on facts on the ground. He himself took over the voting process in his capacity at the state level and dumped hundreds of thousands of black folks off the docket. He created a law where anyone who hadn't voted in x amount of years would be dropped from the registry. So, blacks showed up to vote, and....hmmmmm they're not registered? Interesting. The guy barely beats her. Gerrymandering, all sorts of things have helped Republicans.......
That being said, the COVID phenomenon gave the Democrats something they've lusted for going on years now---the chance to reach every single voter! Mail-in ballots! The lazy folks who don't want to leave the house---voted. The folks living in low-cost housing who normally are apathetic---voted. The minorities who might not have voted---did. The left reached a ton of voters this time using mail-in ballots.
Republicans tend to be anecdotal, and I think this is what destroyed them. It goes something like this (and I know you'll accuse me of caricature, old friend, but that's ok!) "Boy, on the way home from work today, I saw this Trump rally! Sucker had to have around 30,000 people, honey! Meanwhile, that Biden rally cross town only had like 100 people! Biden is going to get WOMPED!" Ok, so this argument is: folks openly declaring a candidate will win.
Rewind to 2016.....Trump voters were quiet. If you called them on the phone with polling, they'd decline to state. Very mysterious. Very guarded. Very quiet. Hillary had some good-sized rallies! Trump had some big ones. But tons of people openly shouted from the roof tops that they're pro-Hillary. Trump voters were quiet or said nothing at all. Then Trump won!
So, is it just possible that rally sizes and loud-mouthed declarations of voting plans aren't tantamount to an assurance of victory? Trump voters now say, "I'm telling you---Trump WON! His rallies were huge, man! Posters everywhere! Trump flags all over downtown! NOthing for Biden! He stole it! He flat took it!"
Or maybe this time the Biden folks were quiet and numerous and got out the vote?
Nothing in the way of evidence, numbers, etc. prove the election was stolen. So, being a person of facts, data, evidence, and support for positions, I cannot in good conscience say it was stolen. Frankly, I wish it would've been stolen and there WERE evidence! I want Trump back. But I cannot make up fake evidence. Wishing something is so, does not make it so.
As for my comments on conspiracy, I do not think they are caricature. I must tell you, I am a member of a couple gun forums and conservative forums. You would not believe, Rus, what these guys believe and say. Seriously, my friend, you wouldn't believe it. And, as you often tell us, "You guys don't know as much about Russia as I do as I live here and you all don't" I must gently say, since you've expatriated, you're cut off from what goes on here. All you hear is TV and anecdotes. You don't hear the stuff on the ground. I live in the epicenter of Tea Party/hardcore right wingville, CA. It's more conservative in my town than Texas! Every "caricature" I made is legit. A massive amount of folks in my town think COVID is fake, a bunch think it's just a dumb flu, many think they had it despite not being tested, a ton of them think doctors are out to dupe them, the vast majority see conspiracies in everything.
And yes, these guys DO believe memes, Rus. I'm serious, my friend. Very very serious. In this one gun forum I'm in, I have to correct these guys on a DAILY BASIS about memes! Abraham Lincoln warned about the rise of gun control in the 21st century, Mark Twain said that Hitler would rise to power, Hitler said socialism will enter America through a fake disease, you name it! They believe it all, too! I have to tell them over and over that this stuff is made-up. Then they accuse me of being a liberal for "fact-checking" them too much.
The above meme is a great example. Phony narrative that Jill was Joe's babysitter and he was cradle-robbing back in the day. They met on a blind date in 1975 in real life. The whole thing was shown to be nonsense, yet you'd be disturbed to see how many bought it and re-tweeted or shared it as this big deal.
Or this little gem. Some black militants invaded the California capitol at Sacramento, and the convenient "US Capitol" is placed here. It gets re-tweeted and everyone jumps on the "Hey, why are we getting yelled at for invading the capitol building? It was done right here in 1967!?!" Problem is, it wasn't. This one was all over the place. Folks do drink this Kool Aid, Rus. I wish they didn't.
I'm a William Buckley/Victor Davis Hanson conservative. I miss the intelligent, well-reasoned, thoughtful, reflective Republican arguments, not the speculative hocus pocus and paranoia brand we see now. I understand where it comes from and why, but the Jewish space lasers and grand conspiracies of alien DNA in the vaccine, it grows as tiresome to me as the gender-swapping, child-sexualizing, drug-legalizing, abortion-loving, cross-dressing, sexual transaction-minded far left and their hysterics.
I'm sick of both parties.
I agree with you on a lot here, though I think that there is a distinct imbalance and so while your characterization of the Left is largely correct both in terms of party platforms and the general direction and thrust of things, your characterization of the right is not so objectively descriptive (given that I don't think the political right to be right, either), but more caricaturish. Leftists really do believe in their identity politics and conception of equality; the average right-winger does NOT think Covid to be fake or that he must believe all memes that attack the Left.
That said, I generally agree with you. I didn't want to make it about masks: I DO believe the election was stolen: I DO believe there is such a thing as conspiracies, the entire question is whether the conspiracy is false or true, and the use of the term "conspiracy theory" (like "discrimination", "tolerance", etc) has become a term for Pavlov's dogs, intended to call up an immediate and negative reaction that short-circuits and fails to think about that question, but leaves the speaker imagining that he has thought. But I think it inappropriate to argue (in the intelligent sense) about the matter here. Here it is enough to establish that you disagree with others in your church and think them unreasonable, and that they similarly disagree with you and think you unreasonable. I don't agree with either position; I think it is possible to be reasonable, though "reasonable" does NOT mean "agree with me". So we can resist this tendency toward falling apart by looking for reasonable and lucid moments in those we disagree with; to see what could be right in those we think wrong.
Or we can write everyone on the other side off as unreasonable, and accelerate the disintegration process.