Oneiric1975
Well-Known Member
- Apr 23, 2021
- 1,044
- 684
- 48
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
You seem well-versed in THE BOOGIEMAN narratives...
WHAT I DO NOW, I AM COMPELLED TO DO:
Upvote
0
You seem well-versed in THE BOOGIEMAN narratives...
Yes, please see page 17-18:
Ideologically motivated lone offenders and small groups pose the most likely terrorist threat to the Homeland, with Domestic Violent Extremists presenting the most persistent and lethal threat....
...Some DVEs and other violent actors8 might target events related to the 2020 Presidential campaigns, the election itself, election results, or the post-election period. Such actors could mobilize quickly to threaten or engage in violence. Violence related to government efforts to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic and amidst otherwise ongoing lawful protests has exacerbated the typical
...Among DVEs, racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists—specifically white supremacist extremists (WSEs)—will remain the most persistent and lethal threat in the Homeland. Spikes in other DVE threats probably will depend on political or social issues that often mobilize other ideological actors to violence, such as immigration, environmental, and police-related policy issues.
View attachment 299105
Your link supports the OP.
According to AG Merrick Garland, speaking before the Senate Appropriations Committee, it is:
The consistency of the civil service employees in the Justice Department, working through the Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies--and possibly earlier--gives those employees a far better insight into democracy's threats than the Trump political appointees who did not have the same tenure.
Garland investigated the 1994 Oklahoma City bombing for the government as well.
White supremacy is top security threat, Garland says
Is the greatest threat to democracy the white supremacists or the Republicans who refuse to act against them, work with them, and accept their support?
They killed less than 40 people in 2018-2019... in less than 10 attacks.
They aren't a real threat to anything. The left needs a white enemy to appeal to their demographics.
They killed less than 40 people in 2018-2019... in less than 10 attacks.
They aren't a real threat to anything. The left needs a white enemy to appeal to their demographics.
Well, if that's the case then I wonder why Right-wing radicals do SO MUCH killing in general. Seems like maybe they are a threat.
Ana, the chart does say "extremist-related murders."
Compared to what?
Ana, the chart does say "extremist-related murders."
Look at the chart.
Which means what to you?
That an extremist committed the murder?
Or that extremism was the motive for murder?
Yeah....less than 400 over a decade.
In the same period, gangs will murder 20,000 people.
What's the bigger threat?
I love the way you make it seem like it "matters" some how.
Oh lemme guess! The topic that makes it all about non-whites, amirite?
It does.
Should we count every murder committed by a Muslim an Islamic extremist related murder?
It's odd that the government treats this as a very dangerous situation when the odds of anyone dying of domestic terrorism is extremely low.
That's why I like the chart. It contains both ideological and non-ideological murder...which makes the right wing extremists look like murder junkies compared to the others.