Genes Linked to Self-Awareness in Modern Humans Were Less Common in Neandertals & Chimps

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,263
36,585
Los Angeles Area
✟829,783.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Genes Linked to Self-Awareness in Modern Humans Were Less Common in Neandertals

Findings published in 2019 have tied the learning and memory necessary for creative thought to three brain networks. These networks, which govern our emotional reactions, self-control and self-awareness, are associated with a suite of 972 genes identified in those studies. The same research group has now compared these genes among chimps, Neandertals and modern humans. Across all three species, the results show an overlap in emotional reactivity but a divergence in genetic sequences governing self-control and self-awareness. In a paper published on April 21 in Molecular Psychiatry, C. Robert Cloninger, a psychiatrist and geneticist at Washington University in St. Louis, and his colleagues report that modern humans also have a set of 267 genes from the larger set that the other two species lack. Most of these sequences are devoted to regulating genes in the self-awareness network.

For the new study, Cloninger and his colleagues considered the 972 gene sequences associated with the three brain networks they identified in modern humans. When the researchers sized up how much of the gene set belonged to each species, they found the biggest differences in those for self-awareness, intermediate differences in those for self-control and small differences in those for emotional reactivity.

Modern humans had solitary dibs on 267 of the genes overall. Of these, more than 90 percent are devoted to turning protein production up or down, most of them in the self-awareness network, as if evolution drove the addition of many fine-tuning dials for this network that enable delicate calibration.

Cloninger says that he and his co-authors, who include anthropologists, are “arguing that by the time H. sapiens left East Africa, they already had the creativity, longevity and sense of community that gave them the advantage to displace other hominids.”

[One drawback to the study:] “It could be that there is another set of genes responsible for cognitive traits in Neandertals that are not in humans,” he says.

[And since we can't test Neandertal self-awareness, we can't really discover those genes and how many there might be.]
 

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,136
51,515
Guam
✟4,909,757.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Anyone want to make predictions on how creationists will spin this? I have few ideas.
Neanderthals were human beings (Homo sapiens in Linnaeus-speak) that were recipients of one of God's special plagues:

Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
2,544
4,305
50
Florida
✟243,988.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Neanderthals were human beings (Homo sapiens in Linnaeus-speak) that were recipients of one of God's special plagues:

Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.

That verse has nothing to do with Neanderthals because the people who wrote it lived many 10's of thousands of year after the last Neanderthal died. They knew nothing of them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,136
51,515
Guam
✟4,909,757.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That verse has nothing to do with Neanderthals because the people who wrote it lived many 10's of thousands of year after the last Neanderthal died. They knew nothing of them.
My disagreement aside, would you be willing to share one of your ideas about how we would spin it?
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
2,544
4,305
50
Florida
✟243,988.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
My disagreement aside, would you be willing to share one of your ideas about how we would spin it?

I think it will have something to do with De Novo genes in sapiens that don't exist in chimps and Neanderthals proving that we were specially created.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,136
51,515
Guam
✟4,909,757.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think it will have something to do with De Novo genes in sapiens that don't exist in chimps and Neanderthals proving that we were specially created.
Oh, that.

Okay, thanks.

That's a little over my head.
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: Gene Parmesan
Upvote 0

Gene Parmesan

Well-Known Member
Apr 4, 2017
695
547
Earth
✟36,853.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I think it will have something to do with De Novo genes in sapiens that don't exist in chimps and Neanderthals proving that we were specially created.
Special creation for sure. Differences are attributed to special creation, and similarities are attributed to a common Designer. Doesn't really matter what we find.
 
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟254,540.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Seems like the whole study boils down to: " We don't really know. " IMO modern humans are sometimes too self aware to be much good. We spend too much time naval gazing and not enough working.
Ships on the sea may be fascinating for those who can see them but not sure how those further inland would be distracted by such?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Oneiric1975

Well-Known Member
Apr 23, 2021
1,044
684
48
Seattle
✟15,282.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
In Relationship
Neanderthals were human beings (Homo sapiens in Linnaeus-speak) that were recipients of one of God's special plagues:

Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.

Wow...God must not have been too keen on the Neanderthals. Were they too Amalekite-ish?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,136
51,515
Guam
✟4,909,757.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Wow...God must not have been too keen on the Neanderthals. Were they too Amalekite-ish?
Do you think, maybe after you get your sarcasm out of your system, you would be willing to explain this question?

How can God not have been "too keen on the Neanderthals," when He turned people into them?

I believe He did just that to King David (see Psalm 38).

Later David repented and was healed.

Did you mean to say that God was not "too keen on people"?
 
Upvote 0

Oneiric1975

Well-Known Member
Apr 23, 2021
1,044
684
48
Seattle
✟15,282.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
In Relationship
Do you think, maybe after you get your sarcasm out of your system, you would be willing to explain this question?

Recipients of one of God's special plagues seems to be a kind of "downer".


I believe He did just that to King David (see Psalm 38).

Later David repented and was healed.

So what did the Neanderthals do to deserve sore sickenesses? Or is your point that good normal people were turned into Neanderthals as a form of sickness?

Wow. That's pretty chauvanistic.


Did you mean to say that God was not "too keen on people"?

Well, SOME people God obviously isn't too keen on. Which is why I brought up the Amalekites.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,136
51,515
Guam
✟4,909,757.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So what did the Neanderthals do to deserve sore sickenesses? Or is your point that good normal people were turned into Neanderthals as a form of sickness?
Let's go over this lesson again:

God warns His people not to sin, or else:

Deuteronomy 28:58 If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD;
59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.
60 Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee.


The people sin:

God sends a bone-altering plague on the people (see Psalm 38).

Paleoarchaeologists mistake those people for Neanderthals.

In short, there is no such thing as a Neanderthal, or Cro-magnon, or anything else like that.
 
Upvote 0