Not exactly.Any day now.
So you're actually claiming that Jesus was there saving all of the children from the flood waters?But when Jesus saw this, He was indignant and told them, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not hinder them! For the kingdom of God belongs to such as these." Mark 10:15
Saving their souls from Hell.So you're actually claiming that Jesus was there saving all of the children from the flood waters?
The Book of Jubilees is not canon. I asked for the passage in Genesis that mentions their names.The wives are named in the Book of Jubilees (160–150 BC) the names of the wives of Noah, Shem, Ham and Japheth are as follows:
· Wife of Noah – Emzara
· Wife of Shem – Sedeqetelebab
· Wife of Ham – Na'eltama'uk
· Wife of Japheth – 'Adataneses
So you're actually claiming that Jesus was there saving all of the children from the flood waters?
Odd that Genesis never mentions this.
Just like with everything else concerning Noah's flood and the Ark, you just make things up as you go, don't you?14,000
If it leaked as bad as you guys claim, it washed overboard.
It was no doubt built well.
No one knows for sure that amount of energy was released.
It doesn't have to.Odd that Genesis doesn't mention that.
I think they're a little smarter than that, don't you?(for as much money as Christians have tithed over the past 2000 years, you'd think someone could have gotten some money together to build an ACTUAL ark to see if it can do what the Bible says it did),
What I'm saying is that you are making stuff up to cover up the uncomfortable details in the story.He did. Little children. Kingdom of Heaven belongs to them. Mark 10:15 Or are you concluding God has to put this on every page of the Bible?
Yes, in fact I do, because they know it would be an epic failure of (dare I say it) Biblical proportions that the entire world would see.I think they're a little smarter than that, don't you?
How convenient. Just keep reading until you find a passage that says what you want it to say.It doesn't have to.
One of the first things that is taught to a new convert is that doctrines are spread out all over the Bible.
You can't expect one passage to explain everything; but you have to take the Scriptures as a whole.
Children drowned in the Flood; but we learn later on that they're in Heaven now.
What I'm saying is that you are making stuff up to cover up the uncomfortable details in the story.
The flood kills children.
People point out how cruel, inhumane and evil this is.
Your reply is "well, it didn't actually happen that way since Jesus was there to wisk them all off to heaven.
Jesus didn't even exist until 2500 years after the flood.
You're just trying to sugarcoat your horrific story.
Just like with everything else concerning Noah's flood and the Ark, you just make things up as you go, don't you?
No evidence, no experimentation (for as much money as Christians have tithed over the past 2000 years, you'd think someone could have gotten some money together to build an ACTUAL ark to see if it can do what the Bible says it did), no research, nothing.
I agree, but I think you're missing the point.Yes, in fact I do, because they know it would be an epic failure of (dare I say it) Biblical proportions that the entire world would see.
The real Ark ... Noah's Ark ... cannot be recreated as it was built in Noah's time.MIDutch said:Complete and utter humiliation would finally put an end to any talk of the ark being real and that can't be allowed to happen.
And never stop reading either.How convenient. Just keep reading until you find a passage that says what you want it to say.
What I'm saying is that you are making stuff up to cover up the uncomfortable details in the story.
The flood kills children.
People point out how cruel, inhumane and evil this is.
Your reply is "well, it didn't actually happen that way since Jesus was there to wisk them all off to heaven.
Jesus didn't even exist until 2500 years after the flood.
You're just trying to sugarcoat your horrific story.
The simulation hypothesis, the hollographic universe, the emergent reality... and probably also the weirdnes of the quantum world that creates our macro reality and is dependent of the measurement effect.
(the 1+1 = 2 does not always work in the quantum world)