- Jan 8, 2016
- 15,530
- 5,869
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I typically delete everything I post after a few days.
I can think of 3 reasons why someone would do that...
Upvote
0
I typically delete everything I post after a few days.
Who's hindering...
So basically...
Could be because almost no one worships Mary.I do not know one who admits to Mary worship
Which is the standard Protestant "Mary wasn't all that" position. As if being greeted by archangels, carrying God Himself within her body, giving birth to the most important being in the history of the universe, being the Godbearer, and yes, like it or not, the Mother of God, was on a par with being made chairman of the church membership drive. Simply put, she was, apart from our Lord Himself, the most important person (not woman, person), in history.although it can very much come across as that (as you are already aware). It certainly far exceeds what the woman who stood corrected by Jesus did.
It would be like standing corrected before God, that's what.I do not know what you would call it if she stood corrected before Jesus.
I never "admit" to being a handsome young man, either, probably because I'm not. It's possible that someone might perceive me to be one, but they'd be wrong.since no one ever admits its worship (although it very much perceived as so)
The heresy is not believing that Jesus is God Himself.I learned something on this thread though ( I think) another poster (forgive me I miss their name, I need to go back and look) but they said something like the term mother of God was taken up because of some sort of heretic thing, is that correct?
Join in a public discussion and the public is very likely to join in as well.Why you keep posting to me to conversations related outside of your initial post to me, why not just tend to your own stuff?
Sorry, mate, but if there's a question in there I failed to detect it. Could you simply ask it?
You guys are killing my buzz, man...
I can think of 3 reasons why someone would do that...
It's in the same chapter that refers to the Trinity.Syllogism aside, there is not one verse of Scripture that calls Mary, "Mother of God."
See above.Since God has no mother
If you believe Jesus is God, then Mary is necessarily the Mother of God.Asking for Scripture that specifically substantiates such a phrase hardly denotes a denial of the God-Man
IS JESUS GOD? If your answer is yes, then Mary is the Mother of God. If not, then you deny the Incarnationany more than the supported use of the phrase automatically denies the fact that God is eternal and has no father or mother (unless this is denied when one says "Mother of God").
Yourself included.Im done with ya, its been a few years since I was here last I just wanted to tap and see if anything is changed, and it hasnt.
Yourself included.
Such as?when I highlight your own contradictions
I don't knw if you're a heretic or not, since you never say what you believe. As I sais, "International Man of Mystery".and ask about them its my fault for not saying more then the scripture so you can actually get me for heresy?
Yours?Whose children do that?
That was me and yes, it was due to a heresy.I agree
Sure maybe they express such disaproval at ever doing that, I do not know one who admits to Mary worship, although it can very much come across as that (as you are already aware). It certainly far exceeds what the woman who stood corrected by Jesus did. When she was simply blessing the same things which pertained to Mary's motherhood (as they specifically related to himself). I do not know what you would call it if she stood corrected before Jesus. Was it somethin other then worship? That he stepped in and said something? I dont think she understood what it was, was it flattery? And this might be the wrong word to use here since no one ever admits its worship (although it very much perceived as so). But I dont want to use the word honour (in the good sense) because we are to honour our parents (And I do not believe Jesus dishonoured her). I believe he sought the honour of His father who is above all, the honour of his mother was not his objective (among men). So I dont know what to call it since (as I have confessed before) I am not good at always finding the right words. You cannot prove a negative it does not say the woman worshipped Mary (or flattered her) it shows where she was off and in what things (and Jesus' correction). Saying all that to say this, that it just appeared as if she felt her virtuous flattery of his mother (as it related to the one bore him and nursed him) would be seen as something positive to him. Even if it was just trying to honour her as his mother (over His Father even) as most blessed in respects to those things only. There is just nothing in the letters by the apostles that treat Mary as central in anything in them or even name her first in a gathering, or by name as made of a woman made under the law, nothing then ressembles what is often seen today.
I do not know all the things they do, I have seen prayers and songs and quite a few things I never saw expressed in the letters by the apostles.
I hope I put that correctly, and I will not argue with you but if a topic comes up (like this one) I try to point these things out using only the scripture I used (as I did earlier on the first few pages) and side with Jesus on them.
I learned something on this thread though ( I think) another poster (forgive me I miss their name, I need to go back and look) but they said something like the term mother of God was taken up because of some sort of heretic thing, is that correct?
Such as?
I don't knw if you're a heretic or not, since you never say what you believe. As I sais, "International Man of Mystery".
IS JESUS GOD? If your answer is yes, then Mary is the Mother of God. If not, then you deny the Incarnation
and we have nothing further to discuss.
GDL, you are much better at articulating yourself, I could definately learn a few things from you in that department, good post.
Come, let's not reason together, right?Simple, human logic like this does not always apply to things pertaining to God.
Neither is "Trinity", and yes, God does have a mother! That is the point! Mary is Jesus' mother, and Jesus is God! Wholly God, wholly man, right? Not kinda sorta part God and part man. There's no theologizing your way out of that.the phrase is not found in Scripture, nor does God have a mother.
I.E., it offends uber-prots who still aren't at all sure about the Incarnation thing.Also, the original intent of the man-made phrase has fallen into extensive abuse
Oh, I'll bet some of our more erudite brethren can tell you precisely when and why, I'll leave that for them.and I would venture to say that few know and understand its origin and reason it was made up.
Nice little ad hominem there, but you gotta go with what you got, right? But Jipsah logic seems to work just fine for most of Christendom who don't share the visceral aversion so many people have to simple truths.In addition, plenty do in fact believe in the divinity of the God-Man, and see the phrase Mother of God to be only what it is - a made-up phrase used in a debate, but now misused extensively, even by some to tell Christians they do not believe Jesus is God. Jipsah logic is therefore meaningless and alleges in error.