D.C. Statehood vote

Handmaid for Jesus

You can't steal my joy
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2010
25,595
32,980
enroute
✟1,402,612.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

Basil the Great

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2009
4,766
4,085
✟721,243.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Green
It will not impact the Presidential races, as DC already has 3 electoral votes. However, it it ever passes, DC will automatically gain 2 Senate seats, as there is no logical way for a Republican to carry DC.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hvizsgyak
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
27,424
45,388
67
✟2,925,440.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Hello @Handmaid for Jesus, this is an excerpt for the Post's article that you posited for us.

H.R. 51 would shrink the federal district to a two-square-mile enclave, including federal buildings such as the Capitol and the White House. The rest of the residential and commercial areas would become the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, to honor abolitionist Frederick Douglass.
I have no problem with this (the cordoning off of a 2 square mile Federal enclave), but the rest of
D. C.'s (non-Federal) land needs to be returned to the States that ceded it to us in the first place, Maryland and Virginia.

The only reason not to has to do with additional control of the Senate (in particular), because that itsy-bitsy piece of land (with its medium city-sized population) would add two more Democrats to the Senate (as well more Democrats to the House, of course). This would give the people of our new "State" (a State with the population of about 750,000 people .. in 2019) the same Federal influence/power over us that our present 50 (state-sized) States have.

I do not believe that America will survive as a "democracy" w/o choice, which is what it will become as a one-party country. The balance that a true, two-party(+) system affords us (where we, the people, continue to have a real choice when we vote) is extremely important, as it keeps the power hungry from BOTH sides of the aisle in Washington in check. Permanent, single-party rule, no matter which party ends up grabbing the power, could quickly lead to a type of government that none of us want (well, the vast majority of us anyway), with the many being oppressed by the few.

God bless you!

--David
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
27,424
45,388
67
✟2,925,440.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Once it passes through the senate, what are the ramifications of this move?
Hi Friend Of, take a look at my post above (post #8) as I have detailed some of the ramifications of D. C. becoming a "State" in that post.

God bless you!

--David
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SilverBear

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2016
7,359
3,297
57
Michigan
✟166,106.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
The only reason not to has to do with additional control of the Senate (in particular), because that itsy-bitsy piece of land (with its medium city-sized population) would add two more Democrats to the Senate (as well more Democrats to the House, of course). This would give the people of our new "State" (a State with the population of about 750,000 people .. in 2019) the same Federal influence/power over us that our present 50 (state-sized) States have.
the itsy bitsy piece of land had more people living on it than the states of Wyoming, Vermont and Alaska
 
  • Informative
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
7,056
3,767
✟290,234.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
If they want to add a state, they should add Puerto Rico. Ceding Washington back to Maryland makes more practical sense if they are worried about under-representation.
But then the Democrats wouldn't get two permanent senators.
 
Upvote 0