LoveGodsWord
Well-Known Member
- Jun 5, 2017
- 22,242
- 6,634
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
No he wasn't. Was James keeping the laws of Leprosy? What about the laws of women? Where does it say that he was keeping the laws for remission of sins and animal sacrifices post after Christ death? If you believe that the Apostles practiced the old covenant laws for remission of sins and animal sacrifices perhaps you can provide some scripture for your view? I cannot see any. That does not mean when they did not know any better after the resurrection at time they didn't do these things as there was a transitional period as the disciples continued to learn from the scriptures in regards to the fulfillment of the old covenant laws with the new covenant based on better promises *Hebrews 8:1-6. Keep in mind the disciples of Jesus when he was crucified and even after His resurrection were in shock as they still believed Jesus to be the promised Messiah to deliver Israel as the conquering King which was not the reason for first His coming *Acts of the Apostles 1:6.A. James was keeping the entire law, including the feast days.
Did you notice that you did not provide a single scripture here that supports your view that James is talking about keeping all the old covenant laws which was what your opening statement was claiming?James was not just referring to the ten commandments, but all the law in this passage:
Jas 2:1 My brothers, show no partiality as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory.
Jas 2:2 For if a man wearing a gold ring and fine clothing comes into your assembly, and a poor man in shabby clothing also comes in,
Jas 2:3 and if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, “You sit here in a good place,” while you say to the poor man, “You stand over there,” or, “Sit down at my feet,”
Jas 2:4 have you not then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?
Jas 2:5 Listen, my beloved brothers, has not God chosen those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him?
Jas 2:6 But you have dishonored the poor man. Are not the rich the ones who oppress you, and the ones who drag you into court?
Jas 2:7 Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called?
Jas 2:8 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well.
Jas 2:9 But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
Jas 2:10 For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.
Jas 2:11 For he who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” If you do not commit adultery but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law.
James in James 2:8-12 is talking about loving our neighbor as our self calling it the law of liberty while the context is giving the example of showing partiality to our fellow man give an example of the rich man and the poor man in James 2:1-7. James in James 2:8-12 then contrasts Gods' 10 commandments that are our duty of love and how we express our love to our fellow man showing that if we break anyone of God's 10 commandments we stand guilty before God of sin.
Paul also shows this in Romans 13:9 where he says that loving our neighbor as our self is simply summing up those of God's 10 commandments that are our duty of love to our fellow man. This is why Jesus says quoting from Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18 "on these two great commandments of love to God and man hang all the law and the prophets in Matthew 22:36-40 while John also agrees with Jesus, James and Paul when he says "By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous in 1 John 5:2-3 and why Jesus says "If you love me keep my commandments in John 14:15 and that keeping God's commandments is how we show our love to God in John 15:10.
So no dear friend, God's Word does not teach anywhere that we are not free to break anyone of God's commandments (including Gods' 4th commandment which is one of God's 10 commandments) according to James 2:10-11 and the other scriptures already provided here. If we do according to John we do not know God in 1 John 2:3-4; 1 John 3:6 and Jesus in Matthew 7:21-23.
The Sabbath (God's 4th commandment) was not included as a "shadow law" in Colossians 2:16. It is the sabbath{s} plural to sabbaths or sabbath days {Genitive neuter plural} that sabbaton has application to in Colossians 2:16 the context of course is to the meat and drink offerings and the new moons that determine the seasons (Genesis 1:14) pointing to the Feast days and their sabbaths of the old covenant which were a shadow of things to come *Colossians 2:17.Yet the Sabbath is included in Col. 2. And it is a shadow law, as a sign of the covenant with Israel, as an appointed time, with sacrifices and drink offerings, pointing to God's rest at creation, and God's deliverance of Israel from Egypt. Now if your argument is that we are Israel, then you need to start keeping feasts as well. But you are not..
That is in reference to the annual sabbaths in the Feast days that are the shadows of things to come not Gods' 4th commandment. There were many different types of sabbaths in the old covenant that are fulfilled in the new covenant promise. None of these however are in reference to Gods' weekly Sabbath which is one of God's 10 commandments that give us the knowledge of what sin is when broken according to Romans 3:20; Romans 7:7; 1 John 3:4 and James 2:10-11.
These annual shadow sabbaths connected to the Feast days included; (1) Feast of Unleavened Bread (first and last day) *Leviticus 23:6-8 (2) Feast of Trumpets *Leviticus 23:24-25 (3) Day of Atonement *Leviticus 23:27-32 (4) Feast of Booths *Leviticus 23:34-36 (5) Feast of First Fruits *Leviticus 23:39 (6) Feast days of Holy convocation of no work (sabbaton Colossians 2:16 *Leviticus 23:7-8; 21;24; 27; 35-36.
It is impossible that Colossians 2:16 is in reference to God's 4th commandment as it a part of the "finished work of creation" *Genesis 2:1-3. There was no sin and no law and no plan of salvation for unfallen man when the Sabbath was made for mankind *Mark 2:27; Genesis 2:1-3. Now notice something very important. God's 4th commandment does not point forward to things to come *Colossians 2:17 it points backward (Remember the Sabbath day to keep it Holy - Exodus 20:8). Gods 4th commandment points backwards because it is a memorial of the finished work of creation and the celebration of God as the creator of heaven and earth...
Lets look at the commandment that points backward not forwards...
Exodus 20:8-11 [8], REMEMBER the SABBATH DAY, to KEEP IT HOLY. <Why?> {Because it is a memorial looking back to the finished work of creation that JESUS made it a Holy day of rest for mankind and commands us to keep it as a Holy day} [9], Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: [10], But the SEVENTH DAY IS THE SABBATH of the LORD thy God {This is a direct reference from God's Word defining what the Sabbath is; The SABBATH = the SEVENTH DAY OF THE WEEK}: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: <WHY> [11], For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the SEVENTH DAY: wherefore the LORD BLESSED THE SABBATH, and HALLOWED IT. {Reference is backward not forward to Genesis 2:1-3}
Therefore, it is impossible for God's 4th commandment seventh day Sabbath to be a "shadow law" as all the "shadow laws" are laws to do with God's plan of salvation from sin after the fall of mankind from the Mosaic book of the law. God's Sabbath was created when there was no sin, no fall, no law and no plan of salvation because mankind was in perfect harmony with God. – So there is nothing there in reference to Gods’ 4th commandment not being a requirement for Christian living in the new testament.
Hope this is helpful
Upvote
0