Christianity In Africa Is Not A Colonizer Religion

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,540
56,197
Woods
✟4,669,644.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
(OPINION) Many educated urbanites dismiss Christianity as a dangerous colonial trickery meant to placate the African and pave the way for his consequent plunder and pillage. The view that Christianity is distinctively a White man’s religion is prevalent, but it is not new.

Jomo Kenyatta, a renown Pan-Africanist and Kenya’s first president is reported to have had a lukewarm view of Christianity, perhaps informed by the colonial experience. “When the missionaries arrived, the Africans had the land and the missionaries had the Bible. They taught how to pray with our eyes closed. When we opened them, they had the land and we had the Bible,” he reportedly lamented.

For Kenyatta’s 15 years as the president, he never once went to church.

Former South African President Jacob Zuma is known to have described the negative influence of Christianity on the otherwise pristinely stellar indigenous African culture.

Walter Rodney, the inimitable academic and African historian, whose magnum opus, “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa inspired and informed several pre-colonial African revolutionaries,” had a similar view of the matter:

“The Christian missionaries were much part of the colonizing forces as were the explorers, traders and soldiers. There may be room for arguing whether in a given colony the missionaries brought other colonialist forces or vice versa, but there is no doubting the fact that missionaries were agents of colonialism in the practical sense whether or not they saw themselves in that light.”

Apart from the troublesome colonial connections, many Africans view Christianity as western and un-African. Jesus is viewed as a White savior. The sacred text is seen as the “White man’s Bible.” And Christianity is scorned as a White man’s religion. This has spawned a form of evangelical activism, which, instead of preaching about sin and salvation, is focusing on Africanizing Christianity. Advocates agitate for the wearing of African attire in church. Instead of suits and tuxedos, believers adorn African kitenges. It is some form of liberation theology; more political than it is theological.

Continued below.
Christianity in Africa is not a Colonizer Religion
 

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You have to read the article in its entirety in order to hit upon the premise behind the title...

But I most certainly agree, Christianity was on the African continent well before it ever came to western nations; the first mention of an African convert in the Bible itself.

no such thing for the blue painted western pagan peoples.

The fact of the matter is that Christianity changes whatever it touches in very real ways. The British are no longer running around half naked, painted blue and worshipping nature, and so African Christians are likewise changed from their more primitive state where Christianity takes hold.

The only people with original claim to Christianity are Jews (who with exception of a remnant rejected it) so if anything the faith Hebrewizes (a word I just made up... lol) us all, yet colonized none.
 
Upvote 0

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,278
4,678
68
Tolworth
✟369,679.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Two documents give the lie to this claim.
One written by an atheist has a very interesting conclusion about Christianity and Africa.
It's by Mathew Parish written for the Times of London, ' Why Africa needs Christianity'
If you hunt around it can still be found.
He grew up in African, left and came back as a journalist. He wrote about the difference he saw between African Christians and non Christian Africans and he saw it was profound, in that the Christian were more dignified, more willing to take responsibility for themselves and there actions and less likely to be swayed by the ' Big Man ' politics so common in Africa.


The other is a study of the fact of protestant missionary activity at grassroot level and how it worked its way up to influence the whole country.

' The missionary roots of Liberal Democracy'

Read them and discuss.
 
Upvote 0