Fail. That looks like major projection on your part.
Some Fox is good, some is terrible (Hannity & Carlson being among the latter.) Fox News is generally fine as are independent journalists, depending on the individual (no to James O'Keefe, yes to Louis Theroux). Why "even" Glenn Greenwald? I haven't noticed any compelling reporting from him, but I haven't really followed him either. I'm not going to contribute to that site's traffic ratings.
OANN and what I've seen of NewsMax have been unreliable or outright propaganda, so I certainly would not use them as my source except as examples of bad journalism.
MediaBiasFactCheck says:
Overall, we rate One America News Questionable based on far-right bias, lack of sourcing, promotion of conspiracy theories, and propaganda, as well as numerous failed fact checks. OAN is not a credible news source.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning:
Poor Sourcing, Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating:
FAR RIGHT
Factual Reporting:
LOW
Country:
USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type:
TV Station
Traffic/Popularity:
High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating:
LOW CREDIBILITY
- We rate Newsmax Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience as well as numerous failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Why you would choose them is understandable, but I prefer credible sources.