As opposed to the rigorous data backing up claims such as "Democrats can't stand in line for as long as Republicans can."?
Might want to notice I put the word perhaps in my response as well before you go too far down this rabbit hole. But I'm sure it'll be different for reasons and such.
You sound angry. Might I suggest taking a deep breath? I don't pretend to know everyone's situation. What seems easy for you or me may be next to impossible for someone else. As I pointed out in another comment, mail is not 100% reliable and there can be delays that may result in your ballot not arriving in time to be counted. Using a drop box, on the other hand, ensures that your ballot will reach election officials in time.
Compared to 2020, access is restricted - at least for counties that employed drop boxes. While it's true that there were no mandatory drop boxes, county election officials were allowed to determine how many they needed. Fulton County had 38 drop boxes in November. They will now be restricted to 8. The drop box that Governor Kemp used in the general election would not be legal, for example. And it affects rural counties too. I can't find the article again, but one election official said that they had five drop boxes in their county (one at each polling place), but they will now be restricted to one under the law.
It’s not like any Georgia elections are going to be bound by this law, seeings as it’s already being contested in Federal Court, and the Georgia legislature will quickly find that extending a right is A-okay, but curbing it will likely need more than just a rational-basis (standard of review) to pass muster.
You're right, I don't know the details. That's why I'm asking. And I'm asking you because you're the one voicing support for the measure. If you don't know either, then why do you support it?
Don't care if or why they're needed. I've given some hypothetical reason why in previous posts, but it's honestly irrelevant to the point I'm trying to make. What's more important is why there needs to be a law limiting the number of them. If you're going to impose legal limits on something, there needs to be a justification behind it - some problem that you're trying to solve by making that thing illegal. Your argument in this thread is akin to people who argue for gun control by simply saying that they don't understand why you would want or need a gun.
Still don't see the relevance to my point. The fact that a majority of people approve of voter ID doesn't change the fact that measures that reduce voter turnout disproportionately affect groups that tend to vote for Democrats.
