VirOptimus
A nihilist who cares.
Scientific law? You are severly clueless about science.Scientific law supports that belief.
There is no data supporting the existance of god(s).
Upvote
0
Scientific law? You are severly clueless about science.Scientific law supports that belief.
I hope you had a blessed Easter.There is no data supporting the existance of god(s).
I dont belive in blessings.I hope you had a blessed Easter.
You don't say grace before you eat!?I dont belive in blessings.
There's plenty of evidence. You just choose not to see it.Another example of a lack of critical thinking.
The issue isn't about how popular a theory is but whether creationism stands on its own two feet as a mainstream scientific theory.
To do so it must be supported by evidence; faith is not evidence unless you can demonstrate otherwise.
Never have, never will.You don't say grace before you eat!?
So explain to us how your eyes are evidence that the Earth is 6000 years old. Explain to us how your eyes are evidence that the Earth was entirely covered with water ca. 2600 BC. Explain to us how your eyes are evidence of Special Creation.My eyes which see the evidence every day also are the evidence.
I think that you are conflating confirmation bias with evidence.My eyes which see the evidence every day also are the evidence.
In reading your reply I'm wondering if you might be seeing the Glory of God in Nature and than translating the wonders of that vision as a 6 day creation. I fully get the seeing the Glory of God in Nature aspect but where I differ is that I see it as part of the evolutionary aspect of the Creating process. That's mainly because the Earth itSelf has shown us that it is through evolution that God Creates.My eyes which see the evidence every day also are the evidence.
Do you see atheists as blind?In reading your reply I'm wondering if you might be seeing the Glory of God in Nature and than translating the wonders of that vision as a 6 day creation. I fully get the seeing the Glory of God in Nature aspect but where I differ is that I see it as part of the evolutionary aspect of the Creating process. That's mainly because the Earth itSelf has shown us that it is through evolution that God Creates.
I am conservative. Let them stick with Greco-Roman.They would have to teach all of them.
The Hindu, Norse, Kemetic, Babylonian/Akkadan, Aztec, Inca, Mayan, East Celtic, Swahili, Kymer, Greek, Proto-Indo-European, etc etc etc...
It's the supposed believers in God whom I often see as blind.Do you see atheists as blind?
Never made any such claims. You're just making stuff up.So explain to us how your eyes are evidence that the Earth is 6000 years old. Explain to us how your eyes are evidence that the Earth was entirely covered with water ca. 2600 BC. Explain to us how your eyes are evidence of Special Creation.
Tons. But nothing you would accept.I think that you are conflating confirmation bias with evidence.
Scientific evidence is very well defined. Do you have any scientific evidence for your beliefs?
They aren't the focus of my question though.It's the supposed believers in God whom I often see as blind.
But Mother Earth does ... right?dlamberth said:I don't concern myself with atheist much ...
Who's "us" in your remark?dlamberth said:That's mainly because the Earth itSelf has shown us that it is through evolution that God Creates.
And you were apparently deaf and blind at the time, right?dlamberth said:... as I've myself have gone through that process.
Yup.They are blind. We all see through a glass darkly, but atheist don't have the Light to allow them to even glimpse reality through that glass.