- Apr 5, 2007
- 140,178
- 25,220
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
No, I never said that. There’s nothing about Israel becoming a full nation in Matt 24.The fig tree was the sign of the Second Coming. You cannot put that as the sign of the destruction of 70AD. You are saying that Israel became a full fledged independent Nation prior to 70AD. Where is that proof?
Matt 24 isn’t about the Second Coming.You cannot take the Second Coming and the end, and lump them all in with 70AD. That is full Preterist. That may not be this forums definition, but according to Scripture, it is.
Nope. None of that is true.The 42 months given to Satan is after the Second Coming. Now you are lumping Revelation into the single statement about the destruction of the Temple. Revelation is about a totally different Temple. One that is built in the generation of the Second Coming. After the fig tree, Israel is a Nation.
So how do you divide up the Olivet Discourse, if you are not full Preterist?
I don’t divide up the Olivet Discourse. It’s all about the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.
Upvote
0