I am a gentile..but I know once we are saved, there is no difference.
I want to know, is it commanded to keep God's festivals, such as Passover for myself? The more I read about man made holidays...the more I'm done with them. (Easter, Christmas, etc) and trust me..I loved Christmas so much. I did put up a tree last year, but over the last 3 or 4 years..something is gently pulling at my heart that it's not right to celebrate. Not stepping on anyone's toes, just what I feel.
God has given no commandments for Christians to observe the Jewish days of observance, those things were part of the Covenant God established with the Jewish people which pointed toward Jesus. With Jesus, the purpose for those things was achieved.
However, Christians have always desired to set aside certain times for the express purpose of remembering or honoring something specific about the Lord and His Gospel. So Christians began to gather on the first day of the week for worship, calling it the Lord's Day, in honor of the Lord's resurrection. Which is why Sunday has, since the time of the Apostles and the New Testament, the ordinary day of Christian worship. Not the only day of worship (historically Christians have met together throughout the week, but the weekly service on Sunday morning has always been the highlight).
Likewise, the Lord's resurrection was something Christians deeply wanted to celebrate and honor. Now the Jewish Passover already provided an opportunity for celebration, simply re-understood in the context of what Jesus has done. Thus the early Christians called their Feast of Christ's Resurrection by the same name as the Jewish Passover in Greek,
Pascha.
How the Paschal Feast was exactly celebrated in the first century isn't entirely clear, but by the middle of the 2nd century we can see two traditions which evolved from first century Christian, apostolic practice:
Two ancient Christian pastors, Anicetus the bishop of Rome and Polycarp the bishop of Smyrna, met together and through their discussions discovered they had virtually all things in common. Even though Polycarp was a pastor in what is modern day Turkey, and Anicetus was a pastor in what is modern day Italy, virtually everything they believed and how they practiced the Christian faith was the same--but with one exception. In Rome the way Christians had been celebrating the Paschal Feast was on the first Sunday after the Jewish Passover, while in Smyrna the way Christians had been celebrating the Paschal Feast was concurrent with the Jewish Passover, on Nissan 14th of the Jewish calendar. In spite of this, they agreed that such difference in practice wasn't problematic, and it did not interfere with their communion with one another.
By the 4th century most of the Church everywhere followed a practice more closely to that of Rome when Anicetus was bishop, and very few churches anywhere continued the Quartodeciman (Latin for "Fourteen-ist") tradition. At the Council of Nicea in 325 AD the bishops of the Christian Church around the Roman Empire gathered together in order to address the Arian controversy, and at which time they put forward a statement of faith emphasizing Christ's true Deity over and against the teaching of Arius that Jesus was a creature, rather than the Almighty Creator. However, those gathered also addressed other matters, such as pastoral discipline (one example being that pastors shouldn't co-habitat with women who aren't their spouse or immediate family member, so as to avoid suspicion of inappropriate behavior); one of these things they did was to come to an agreement over a standardized time to celebrate the Paschal Feast. As such the council wrote a letter to the Church in Alexandria that the Alexandrian method of calculating the Paschal Feast would become the standard method to be accepted everywhere in the Church.
Here was the Alexandrian method of Paschal calculation: Rather than relying on the Jewish Passover, calculating the Christian Paschal Feast was to celebrate on the first Sunday after the Paschal Full Moon. The Paschal Full Moon being determined as the first full moon after the spring equinox (March 21st). Which is why even now, in 2021, we celebrated the Paschal Feast on April 4th (Gregorian Calendar); March 28th was the Paschal Full Moon (first full moon after March 21st), and the first Sunday after March 28th was April 4th.
You'll notice I've consistently been saying Pascha/Paschal here, rather than "Easter". And that is on purpose, because in most languages throughout most of history the word for the Christian Feast of Jesus' Resurrection is called Pascha, or some variation of the same. For example:
Old English - Pascan
Spanish - Pascua
Italian - Pasqua
Portuguese - Páscoa
Romanian - Paşti
French - Pâques
Albanian - Pashka
Welsh - Pasg
Irish - Cáisc
Dutch - Pasen
Danish - Påske
Amharic (Ethiopian) - Fasika
The term "Easter" is unique, only English (Easter) and German (Ostern) use this word.
You may have read that this is named after a pagan goddess, and the answer to that is that it's a solid
maybe.
The trouble here is that we only have one source, an Anglo-Saxon monk by the name of Bede who wrote On the Reckoning of Time. In a very brief portion of the work he turns his attention to explaining how the old Anglo-Saxons used to reckon time. And so he gives the Anglo-Saxon names of the twelve months, and how they roughly correspond to the Latin months. The month which corresponds to the Latin April is called
Eosturmonath ("Easter-month"). Bede then says that the name of the month was derived from an old Anglo-Saxon goddess that the Anglo-Saxons worshiped before their conversion to Christianity, a goddess by the name of Eostre.
Bede doesn't give us anymore information than that. He doesn't say how Eostre was worshiped by the old pagans, he doesn't describe any feasts, rites, practices, etc associated with the worship of Eostre. Just that the name "Eostre" was the origin of
Eosturmonath, and that the Anglo-Saxons had developed the custom of calling the Paschal Feast by the name of the month,
Eostre, which would later become "Easter".
Now this alone means something very important: Our one and only source about this "Eostre" worshiped by the ancient pagan Anglo-Saxons tells us nothing else. That means that if anyone claims that things like eggs, rabbits, etc were part of "Eostre worship" they are making it up. Or more likely they are just repeating something they heard. The problem is that there's no way anyone could know this--there is precisely zero in all of history and the entire archeological record. Zero anything else.
But perhaps more importantly is that because Bede is the only source here, there remains the very real possibility that he was simply wrong. And that the name of Eosturmonath didn't arise from the name of a hypothetical goddess named Eostre; but instead stems from the ancient word for dawn, as in the direction of the rising sun--
east. That is, it is possible that the more correct etymology for Eosturmonath is "dawn" or "dawning month", that is the month when the sun begins to rise earlier in the morning and the days get longer.
The real meat-and-potatoes of the point here is that if you've been taught that Easter is bad/pagan, you've been deeply misinformed. And unfortunately there is a lot of terribly misinformed people on this subject, because sometimes falsehoods become more commonly "known" than the actual truth. Consider how at one point it was widely believed, especially in the United States, that Columbus sailed west in order to prove the earth was round. It's not true, not even a little bit, not least of all because everyone in Europe already knew the earth was round. Columbus wanted to sail west because he (incorrectly) believed the world was smaller than it was. Columbus was a lucky idiot, and also one of history's worst human beings.
If you are curious about sources for anything I've said here, I would be more than happy to provide them.
But rest assured in this: You are under no obligation to observe any special days; and there is nothing wrong with celebrating traditional Christian holy days. Christmas, Easter, etc are not bad, pagan, there's nothing corrupt or evil about them. They are thoroughly, fully, entirely Christian days that are specifically centered upon Jesus Christ and the salvation we have in Him.
-CryptoLutheran
-CryptoLutheran