rusmeister
A Russified American Orthodox Chestertonian
- Dec 9, 2005
- 10,407
- 5,026
- Country
- Montenegro
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
It is perfectly related, as for the last 10 months or so, protopresbyter Heers has been promoting
1) Theories about the Zionists, Kabbalah, Masonists and the Global Elite being behind the corona virus with the plan of seating the Anti-Christ as the world ruler, with the crisis being just the shortcut to bring people to submission
2) Asserting a novel doctrine of the temple area as a totally illness-free zone (even in regard to person-to-person infection) as dogma (consequently, those who employ or agree with sanitary measures are heretics, blasphemers or at best in grave error)
3) Promoting "holy disobedience" to the bishops in regard to the sanitary measures
4) Taking a very political stance pro-Trump, despite his clerical rank, and spreading conspiracy theories about the election having been stolen.
5) Exhorting the Orthodox to not take take the COVID-19 vaccine and spreading theories about it being the Mark of the beast or a "precursor".
In short, he falls under each and every category of issues Met. Joseph discusses in his letter and in no uncertain terms, condemns. Now, Heers obviously isn't under his jurisdiction (good for him, he would be suspended or even defrocked at this point.) In fact, it seems he is under no-ones active pastoral oversight as he says he is under a ROCOR-USA bishop while residing permanently in Greece.
1) How do you know #1 is false?
2) As you put it, I agree that that would be bad. I would be interested in seeing substantiation that that is precisely what Fr Peter teaches.
3) I agree that disobedience to a bishop should be an extremely rare thing, done only in the certainty of heresy on the part of the bishop and in the fear of God. I think the issue is one of what a bishop may legitimately command, and that is limited to what is taught in Holy Tradition. There are many things in which a bishop’s authority to command is dubious or non-existent. I think masks to be in that category.
4) The election WAS stolen, 100%. And Trump proved to be a decent man to my surprise. I was a never-Trumper in the summer of 2016. Nothing wrong with supporting him.
5) How do you know the vaccine is not a danger?
In short, your complaints can be challenged. They do not present givens that we must accept without question. Your own opinions are controversial and challengeable.
All of this, to my mind, falls under what I see as the division of the war of fashion on tradition, between those that believe that everything changes, including divine revelation and church practice and teaching, and those who believe more in its general constancy. Please correct me if I’m wrong, but you probably believe that the virus is the greatest danger, and that all measures are justified in trying to stop it, and you believe in human evolution. You probably support enough of the Democratic Party platform to have voted for them, though perhaps not. This is not an ad hominem attack, but to make a point that there IS a general division, and that most of us find ourselves definitively on one side or the other of it, with only exceptions on occasional issues here or there. It is NOT primarily political, though it affects how we see politics as well.
Upvote
0