The world does change, regularly, and there are always people who don't like it , but change is necessary. Only in a perfect world would there be no need for change. Dumbing it down to a few buzzwords like fox and the like do adds absolutely nothing of any use and only promotes conflict.
Right wing elites are as elite as left wing elites. The whole concept is a red herring. There are few places in the world where those in power might not be thought of as elite in terms of education, wealth, influence etc. Globalisation has had remarkably positive effects in the world, lifting millions of people out of poverty. It is also one reason - not the only reason - why some people in manufacturing jobs have lost work. But manufacturing jobs are not fixed features of the universe, tbh it is a little bit hard to understand how people who believe in 'rugged individualism' are so dependent on someone providing them with work regardless of any other factor. When it comes down to it, everyone wants the govt to help, and government support for obsolete industrial practices is just another form of welfare.
Good news maybe for people who see global cooperation as somehow inherently evil is that we seem to be moving past it, countries appear to be coalescing into groups based on shared values, the well-being economy type ideas that has led to a pact of sorts and a commitment to future cooperation between Iceland, Scotland and NZ may represent a model for how the world will look in a few decades, with countries sharing certain outlooks and priorities building closer ties. Geographical proximity ain't what it used to be.