Vaccines, in general, have demonstrated both efficacy and safety in rigorous tests. The COVID vaccines, have gone through significant testing, but not as lengthy or rigorous as previous vaccines have done, precisely in order to get them out quickly in response to the pandemic.
Do you fully trust pharmaceutical companies to put the health and well being of their customers ahead of profit interests? Their past actions suggest that they quite often do the reverse.
As far as them not "forcing" the vaccine, requiring documentation of vaccination to perform basic societal functions is soft way to force the vaccine. I agree that vaccination should be tracked, and creating a system to facilitate that tracking is common sense. Requiring people be vaccinated to shop at grocery stores, for example, is over reach, especially as it is not even currently known that the vaccines significantly reduce the spread of the virus. Continuing to require masking and social distancing, on the other hand, is a reasonable approach, which doesn't encroach on people's decisions about their own health.
I am absolutely a proponent of masking and social distance practicing, and, as i've noted, i am registered to get the vaccine myself. That being said, the language used by those, such as yourself, that questioning the efficacy and safety of vaccines is "irresponsible" is not only a false characterization, but also serves to push those with concerns into an oppositional stance. Instead of using emotional rhetoric to bully those with doubts, provide information which would eliminate those doubts. Part of the problem with that approach is that the information as to the efficacy and safety of the vaccines is still in question.