I see that you prefer to “anticipate revelation” and insert what was revealed to Paul by the ascended Christ, into what Christ told Israel before the cross.
This allow you to conclude that Jesus “must not have meant what he literally stated”, since he would then be contradicting the latter revelations.
Alright then, thanks for clarifying your doctrine.
Hi Guojing,
Who are you trusting in for your salvation (eternal life)? Yourself and your works of obedience?
But now, I am also trusting in what you have been saying. I am thankful based on Romans 11:11
The difference is that I don’t anticipate revelation and respect that Jesus was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel during the his first coming on earth (Matthew 15:24)
thus I don’t try to change what he said to Israel in time past. He said what he meant and he meant what he said
Hi Guojing,
You did not answer my very direct and specific question: Who are you trusting in for your salvation (eternal life)? Yourself and your works of obedience?
Hi Guojing,I am trusting in the death burial and resurrection of Christ for my salvation (1 cor 15:1-4)
that is also what you are trusting for yours right?
Hi Guojing,
I am trusting Jesus Christ 100% for His payment in full on the cross for me, which was absolutely sufficient to cleanse, redeem, save, and justify me. (Romans 5:1-2; Galatians 2:15-16; John 3:16).
Just curious how you can be trusting 100% in Jesus if you are adding your own works of obedience into your "salvation equation?"
Guojing said:I am not, I am stating that the sufficiency of death burial and resurrection of Christ on the cross for salvation was not offered to Israel during Jesus first coming on Earth, which is denoted as time past.
In Luke 9:6, for example, the 12 were not preaching that.
The way to salvation for Israel was not based on that, but rather based on believing the identity of Jesus as the promised son of God (John 20:31), which still required law keeping. Jesus told them in a number of places and I took what he said literally, instead of anticipating revelation.
But because Israel rejected their Messiah, the ascended Christ revealed to Paul a mystery, that but now, salvation is now based on the sufficiency of death burial and resurrection of Christ on the cross for salvation
The atonement which included the death of Christ on the cross, and later his resurrection after his burial, is the only effective way for payment for justice that God would never compromise that anyone would ever be saved as God's love called for that.
Without knowledge of that, where the gospel has never reached, salvation is still available, as God is not willing that any would perish, with knowing God is there, as God provides for essential knowledge for any such people, and knowing we are separated from God and our sinful ways have something to do with that among those of the age of accountability, and with repenting trusting in the redeemer God would need to provide for any being saved. That is essential to them, there are no exceptions to that, where the gospel reaches they can trust Jesus Christ, those that reject Jesus Christ are the ones rejecting that which is essential in being saved. What there is to know about Jesus Christ is from what the Bible shows, people need to hear what is said of Jesus Christ in there, or read it themselves.
To make the argument about people being saved without knowing Christ, it would be necessary to use a New Testament example.
That isn't the issue. Those people who died before the Savior came are in a different category from those who believe or don't believe in Christ after the sacrifice of the Cross, the establishment of Christ's church, and so on. For purposes of dealing with the question being considered, it's the situation of the latter group which is critical.What, you don't believe "The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed...."?
That isn't the issue. Those people who died before the Savior came are in a different category from those who believe or don't believe in Christ after the sacrifice of the Cross, the establishment of Christ's church, and so on. For purposes of dealing with the question being considered, it's the situation of the latter group which is critical.
The way that the righteous in OT times found salvation was different (Abraham's Bosom and all that) from those people of later times who were being debated.Certainly they are in a different category. I believe there are "benefits to membership" in the Body of Christ that not even the Hebrew patriarchs will enjoy.
But salvation is the issue, and what was being discussed.
Those people who died before the Savior came are in a different category from those who believe or don't believe in Christ after the sacrifice of the Cross, the establishment of Christ's church, and so on.
Certainly they are in a different category. I believe there are "benefits to membership" in the Body of Christ that not even the Hebrew patriarchs will enjoy.
The way that the righteous in OT times found salvation was different (Abraham's Bosom and all that) from those people of later times who were being debated.
The example you gave of Job, therefore, doesn't help; and there are no examples from the New Testament that I know of in which a non-believer is named, identified, as being saved just the same.
Salvation is 100% through Jesus Christ because apart from Him we can do nothing John (15:5), whether to believe, or to persist in doing good Rom (2:7), or to obey the law (Rom 2:13 and Matt 19:26), or to do those works that He’s prepared for us to do in advance (Eph 2:10), or do to “for the least of these” (Matt 25), or to (put to death the sins of the flesh (Rom 8:12-13), or to be holy (Heb 11:6) and righteous (James 2:24), all of which are said, in one way or another, to be necessary in order to gain eternal life. We are saved by faith, via faith, through and on the basis of faith, not simply because we have faith as if that belief, by itself, should save us.I honestly think the idea that true faith somehow automatically produces works is complete nonsense. I believe that doing works is a result of your own free will and free choice. If you truly have faith, you will not become a robot that is automatically programmed to do everything right. That is sinless perfectionism and it's a false teaching. No-one is perfect, we are all sinners and we are still sinful even after salvation. The Bible says there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.
The Bible teaches that we are saved through faith and not through works:
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." - Ephesians 2:8-9
So if we are saved through faith, but we are not saved through works, that should prove that faith has absolutely nothing to do with works. They are two totally separate things. If we are saved through faith, but we are not saved through works, then the logical conclusion is that faith does not equal works. We can do good works to earn rewards in heaven but none of that can ever be a payment for sin. Salvation has to be 100% through Jesus Christ. He is the way, the truth and the life.
I honestly think the idea that true faith somehow automatically produces works is complete nonsense. I believe that doing works is a result of your own free will and free choice. If you truly have faith, you will not become a robot that is automatically programmed to do everything right. That is sinless perfectionism and it's a false teaching. No-one is perfect, we are all sinners and we are still sinful even after salvation. The Bible says there is not a just man upon earth, that doeth good, and sinneth not.
The Bible teaches that we are saved through faith and not through works:
"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." - Ephesians 2:8-9
So if we are saved through faith, but we are not saved through works, that should prove that faith has absolutely nothing to do with works. They are two totally separate things. If we are saved through faith, but we are not saved through works, then the logical conclusion is that faith does not equal works. We can do good works to earn rewards in heaven but none of that can ever be a payment for sin. Salvation has to be 100% through Jesus Christ. He is the way, the truth and the life.
Albion said:To make the argument about people being saved without knowing Christ, it would be necessary to use a New Testament example.
I think all the old testament saints, in the cloud of witnesses, are examples of people not knowing of Jesus Christ while they were this earth who were saved. And it was Jesus Christ in whom they were saved. God then provided essential knowledge for the faith they had with their being saved. 2 Peter 3:9 is basis in the new testament of the Bible to say those where the gospel does not yet reach that have opportunity to know of God and come to repentance, that they can be saved in Jesus Christ, knowing they have a redeemer.