Scientist behind Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine says next target is cancer

Landon Caeli said:

BERLIN - The scientist who won the race to deliver the first widely used coronavirus vaccine says people can rest assured the shots are safe, and the technology behind it will soon be used to fight another global scourge — cancer.

Asked when such a therapy might be available, Tureci said "that’s very difficult to predict in innovative development. But we expect that within only a couple of years, we will also have our vaccines (against) cancer at a place where we can offer them to people."

Scientist behind Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine says next target is cancer

...Well isn't that something. Messenger RNA vaccines seem to be the wave of the future!

Click to expand...

There's also possibilities as a therapy against autoimmune diseases. All a very long way from producing clinical results:https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/01/12/more-things-to-do-with-mrna

Actually, I think that's what they were being developed for, before the onset of this 'demic.

Yes, I think there is definitely a link between Covid Vaccines and new cancer treatments.
HERE is a brief article on it's development.

+1 for new cancer treatment potentials, seeing as how the old ones were not able to save a couple of my loved ones.

Landon Caeli said:

vaccine says people can rest assured the shots are safe,

Click to expand...

Don't worry about the thousands of associated deaths, and many more thousands of serious adverse events...convulsions, paralysis, thrombosis, auto-immune disorders, the list goes on.

Russian Roulette's no cause for optimism, friend.

534 Dead 330,063 Reported Injured following COVID19 Experimental Vaccine Injections in the U.K.

Shrewd Manager said:

Don't worry about the thousands of associated deaths, and many more thousands of serious adverse events...convulsions, paralysis, thrombosis, auto-immune disorders, the list goes on.

Click to expand...

Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis...

"detected 21 cases of anaphylaxis after administration of a reported 1,893,360 first doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (11.1 cases per million doses)"

So, about 1 in 100,000...

Shrewd Manager said:

Russian Roulette's no cause for optimism, friend.
534 Dead 330,063 Reported Injured following COVID19 Experimental Vaccine Injections in the U.K.

Click to expand...

Man. Watch out for the vaccine! It can retroactively give you a congenital disorder, make you pregnant AND give you Social Circumstances!

===

=====

Or, maybe these people had these conditions before they took the vaccine?
(except for the actual death parts)

Petros2015 said:

Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis...

"detected 21 cases of anaphylaxis after administration of a reported 1,893,360 first doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (11.1 cases per million doses)"

So, about 1 in 100,000...

Click to expand...

That's as conservative an estimate as you'll find, and for anaphylaxis only.

I'd be a little circumspect about relying on the fox to report on the chicken count in the henhouse.

VAERS is well-known to be under-reported, but still yields some interesting results:

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Request

Petros2015 said:

Man. Watch out for the vaccine! It can retroactively give you a congenital disorder, make you pregnant AND give you Social Circumstances!

Click to expand...

Lol, sounds almost as bad as Covid, which can strike you down mercilessly while riding a motorbike or when you're old and riddled with late stage cancer!

Shrewd Manager said:

and many more thousands of serious adverse events...convulsions, paralysis, thrombosis, auto-immune disorders, the list goes on.

Click to expand...

It certainly does.



I feel like these guys

Shrewd Manager said:

534 Dead 330,063 Reported Injured following COVID19 Experimental Vaccine Injections in the U.K.

Click to expand...

who are citing these reports

Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine adverse reactions

https://assets.publishing.service.g...A_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf

Might be using the words "reported injured" a little broadly in order to spin the narrative that they want.

I mean who, really, is the victim when there is extreme Flatulence involved? We all are my friend. We all are.

Petros2015 said:

Or, maybe these people had these conditions before they took the vaccine?
(except for the actual death parts)

Click to expand...

But seriously, the pregnancy conditions would presumably be miscarriages. Congenital disorders again referring to natal, birth defects maybe. Idk what social circumstances is about.

Petros2015 said:

I mean who, really, is the victim when there is extreme Flatulence involved? We all are my friend. We all are.

Click to expand...

Certainly seems to be the scourge of the politicians and health bureaucrats. What's the cure?

Shrewd Manager said:

Idk what social circumstances is about.

Click to expand...

Heh. "verbal abuse". That would be hilarious if it had resulted in a fatality...

One person's report after-effect reaction to the covid vaccine was to move into the High Income bracket... That's pretty cool...
2 people picked up smoking and apparently think it had something to do with being vaccinated?
1 person became illiterate... Reading Rainbow might fix that one.

Bedridden, Immobile, Sight Disability are considerably less funny (not funny at all), but a little hard to determine if these were pre-existing or coming anyway to the person who took the vaccine vs "this came out of the blue" shortly after taking it. Many of the (I think 11 million recipiants so far in UK?) would have started with older population w pre-existing conditions.

I feel like you kind of have to do a deep dive to really get a feel for the population that was getting the vaccine, the number of people involved vs the reported "Yellow Card" reactions which seem to be followup surveys of "are you experiencing any of these things" shortly after getting vaccine.

I do take issue with the article headlining all these things as "reported injuries" vs "reported post vaccine condition changes" or "yellow card reaction reports". The reporting system (I think) is built to cast a wide net so that if a large # of adverse reactions are being reported they can take a look and do a recall effectively. But it's probably catching a lot of things that were pre-existing, or evolving on the way as well as any legitimate "this was possibly my body's sudden reaction to this vaccine" reports.

At the end of the report for this one vaccine that I linked to, you can see this



which also lets you know that when the article says "330,063 Reported Injured", it's not even individual people; it's individual reported possible post vaccine reactions and/or events. So if I report "headache, skin rash, diarreha" that went away 3 days after taking the vaccine, in that article it would show up as "3 report injuries", which is completely misleading. Editor should be fired imho. I don't like to be misled, no one does.

I'd have to take a deeper dive into what the reporting criteria actually are and who is making the reports, but that's my feeling. Deep dives are always helpful for getting an accurate view of the situation, and they can be funny too. At any rate, I learned a bit more today, thank you for spurring me to do so.

Petros2015 said:

Heh. "verbal abuse". That would be hilarious if it had resulted in a fatality...

Click to expand...

Indeed. The lighter side of genocide. Always some slapstick moments.

Petros2015 said:

One person's report after-effect reaction to the covid vaccine was to move into the High Income bracket... That's pretty cool...
2 people picked up smoking and apparently think it had something to do with being vaccinated?
1 person became illiterate... Reading Rainbow might fix that one.

Click to expand...

Hope it was the new smokers who moved to a higher income bracket, for their sake.

Petros2015 said:

I'd have to take a deeper dive into what the reporting criteria actually are and who is making the reports, but that's my feeling. Deep dives are always helpful for getting an accurate view of the situation, and they can be funny too.

Click to expand...

There's a few deep dive vids around, which run through the minutiae of the reports of a given cross-section, I glanced at a few, don't recall being struck by the comedic value of the accounts. Still, if you can find the detail of some of these anomalous items you've spotted, by all means.