Yes, Trump won by winning the primary states. He lost the caucus states big time. I was in one of the latter states and at the state convention as a mid-level hack. We didn't want Trump, but the media wouldn't stop talking him up. It was like he could do no evil. That is until it was too late. Then it became all bad man all the time.Joe Sixpack also voted for Trump in the primaries, not just the general election. The idea that Hillary engineered Trump's nomination has to explain how he won almost all the primaries and won them big. That's how he got the nomination of his party.
Considering both of them are competitors for "who can handle covid the worst" I doubt either of them well do very well.Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida is in the spotlight at the moment and Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota has often been mentioned.
It's not going to matter unless the Constitution is upheld and people in the swing states in particular get pro-active. We need to get back to voting in person except for legitimate health reasons. There needs to be overhead cameras of the counting process and the recordings need to be made public. Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. Observers must sign in and sign out. There should be mandatory jail time for anyone who prevents observation.Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida is in the spotlight at the moment and Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota has often been mentioned.
It's not going to matter unless the Constitution is upheld and people in the swing states in particular get pro-active. We need to get back to voting in person except for legitimate health reasons. There needs to be overhead cameras of the counting process and the recordings need to be made public. Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. Observers must sign in and sign out. There should be mandatory jail time for anyone who prevents observation.
"Legitimate health reasons" do postal voting during a pandemic is obviously legitimate then, glad we agree.It's not going to matter unless the Constitution is upheld and people in the swing states in particular get pro-active. We need to get back to voting in person except for legitimate health reasons. There needs to be overhead cameras of the counting process and the recordings need to be made public. Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. Observers must sign in and sign out. There should be mandatory jail time for anyone who prevents observation.
You'd think what you've referred to--or most of it at least--would be something no American could deny.It's not going to matter unless the Constitution is upheld and people in the swing states in particular get pro-active. We need to get back to voting in person except for legitimate health reasons. There needs to be overhead cameras of the counting process and the recordings need to be made public. Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote. Observers must sign in and sign out. There should be mandatory jail time for anyone who prevents observation.
Those legislatures, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, etc. were republican.You'd think what you've referred to--or most of it at least--would be something no American could deny.
But of course, no state legislature that is controlled by the party that benefitted from sloppy and fraud-prone vote counting procedures such as those instituted just before the 2020 election will ever want to backtrack on them
Those legislatures, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, etc. were republican.
And they all have republicans in positions of power well able to the same for their side. Oh but wait a minute republicans never coomit voter fraud....That's not really an accurate assessment of the situation. All of them were Republican in the past, but even so, they all have Democrats in political positions of power capable of facilitating what I was referring to--the Governor, inner-city counting boards, the state Attorney General, Democratic-appointed judges, etc. That's independent of how the votes fell, statewide, this past November.
The problem being discussed was not just about the several states that were most in the news recently because of charges of vote irregularities. There are a number of other states in which the same questionable changes in the electoral system were instituted and which are part of the question.
And they all have republicans in positions of power well able to the same for their side. Oh but wait a minute republicans never coomit voter fraud....
It's often not the states, but the counties. And with big cities the cities and counties are almost the same, with a different set of politically aligned bureaucrats at each level. States can have SOME influence on counties, but many populous counties are controlled by Democratic Party machines. Cook County in Illinois is but one prominent example.That's not really an accurate assessment of the situation. All of them were Republican in the past, but even so, they all have Democrats in political positions of power capable of facilitating what I was referring to--the Governor, inner-city counting boards, the state Attorney General, Democratic-appointed judges, etc. That's independent of how the votes fell, statewide, this past November.
The problem being discussed was not just about the several states that were most in the news recently because of charges of vote irregularities. There are a number of other states in which the same questionable changes in the electoral system were instituted and which are part of the question.
There's probably nothing more to say if you don't understand that the issue, both of the changes made last year and efforts to reverse some of that, concerns a number of different states, not just the several that were cliffhangers last November.
OR that if some elected officials are Republicans and others are Democrats--which is how it is in almost every state--that it only takes the right ones to able to make these changes we're talking about. That was proven last year also.