I would like to ask Christians to read Matthew 10:34
NIV 34 “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
KJV 34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
What is Jesus talking about here?
I am afraid Jesus Christ never gave His followers any commandments about how to run a kingdom or Country, so He, Jesus Christ, has nothing to do with man's politics and the lot.If someone plans to start a war that person should be removed from office Jesus said My kingdom is not of this world.
I am afraid Jesus Christ never gave His followers any commandments about how to run a kingdom or Country, so He, Jesus Christ, has nothing to do with man's politics and the lot.
Instead, Jesus Christ commanded His followers against the occupying of seats of authority, and the installing of themselves in leadership roles over their brothers(Matthew 20 vs 24-28). How can one who disobeys Jesus Christ be expected to do as Jesus Christ commands?
A boiling cauldron of hate from the beginning of time.
Do not be deceived, we are living in the last days.
You are correct about the total annihilation of the enemies of God by God.
Let us pray for the peace of Israel, for the middle east is front and center of end time Prophecies.
So, what part of the passage sanctions politics/leadership as we know it?That passage does not say not to hold a seat of authority. It literally says a leader must serve others.
So, what part of the passage sanctions politics/leadership as we know it?
24 The other ten followers heard this and were angry with the two brothers.
25 So Jesus called the followers together. He said, “You know that the rulers of the non-Jewish people love to show their power over the people. And their important leaders love to use all their authority over the people.
26 But it should not be that way with you. Whoever wants to be your leader must be your servant.
27 Whoever wants to be first must serve the rest of you like a slave.
28 Do as I did: The Son of Man did not come for people to serve him. He came to serve others and to give his life to save many people.”
It is possible for a man to, get into politics and not wield and use authority over the people?
The intelligence didn't come from "The Shia regime". There was some very inconclusive intelligence from the Kurdish government (where the attack on the US base took place) which certainly didn't justify this attack 500 kilometers away in Syria.The Shia regime in Iraq, in the same week it welcomed the pope and made efforts to reconcile with Christians, gives intelligence relating to Shia terrorist groups.
They're also allies of the Iraqi government and were instrumental in defeating ISIS and other Al Qaeda groups in Iraq and Syria.The Biden regime targets terrorists intent on destabilising the region. The Syrian government do not like it because these Hezbollah are their allies
"back"? When did America leave? And if there's a line of terrorist sponsoring states, Syria would be at the back of the line and the US at the front.but it will get the message that America is back and it cannot just go back to being the terrorist-sponsoring state it was before the Arab Spring.
I don't see how this is for any greater good. Try explaining that to the families of those killed without trial or recourse, whose crime was to be mobilized against the existential threat posed to Iraq and Syria by NATO and Saudi backed jihadists.What this says to me is that active steps are now being taken by concerned parties across the Middle East to bring peace to the region. Terrorism and lawlessness are out and peace and reconciliation are in.
The intelligence didn't come from "The Shia regime". There was some very inconclusive intelligence from the Kurdish government (where the attack on the US base took place) which certainly didn't justify this attack 500 kilometers away in Syria.
They're also allies of the Iraqi government and were instrumental in defeating ISIS and other Al Qaeda groups in Iraq and Syria.
"back"? When did America leave? And if there's a line of terrorist sponsoring states, Syria would be at the back of the line and the US at the front.
I don't see how this is for any greater good. Try explaining that to the families of those killed without trial or recourse, whose crime was to be mobilized against the existential threat posed to Iraq and Syria by NATO and Saudi backed jihadists.