Ed1wolf
Well-Known Member
- Dec 26, 2002
- 2,928
- 178
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Presbyterian
- Marital Status
- Single
And I thought you had debated before. I guess I was wrong.ed: You do know I am playing Devils advocate here right?
dm: No, I don't know that.
I just assumed your debating experience and reading comprehension would answer that question. Again, I guess I was wrong and over estimated you.dm: You are extremely zealous in your support of Hitler. I have suggested that maybe you are just playing devil's advocate and you did not respond.
I dont even know what 6MWE means. I dont identify with any racist group. As a Christian, I consider racism antithetical to Christianity as do most Christians.dm: When I combine this with the fact that the people you seem to identify with are wearing racist "6MWE" tee shirts, I don't know.
How do you know that your definition of fairness is right and theirs is wrong?ed: You just feel he was not fair to them, right?
dm: No, I know that Hitler was not fair to the Jews.
That is a subjective basis, not objective.ed: On what objective basis?
dm: On the same basis I have told you many times before: If people like Hitler kill each other, it breaks the trust relationship we need to survive.
Yes, you did.ed: You are the one that claimed if something was done out of love then it could be justified even killing.
dm: False. I never said this.
Again, those are subjective reasons.ed: Why is your love better than his, objectively?
dm: Same answer as every other time you asked: I want to live, and if people like Hitler indiscriminately kill
each other, that breaks the trust relationship we need to survive.
ed: Only because he killed and was unfair to your favorite species, homo sapiens.
dm: No. because Hitler broke the trust relationship we need to survive. (And I want to survive.)
And WE is homo sapiens, thanks for confirming what I just wrote.
Upvote
0