- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,222
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
I don't understand your point.
From context, I assumed you meant:
"If evolution isn't true then it should be difficult to distinguish species."
Is that what you meant?
If so, can you explain the chain of reasoning?
All I’m saying is that ‘species’ can be hard to distinguish by any measure, given its ‘whatever it is’ definition. Variation among ‘kinds’ (evolution not true) is often confused by the use of it, whether a result that was intended by evolutionists or not, I don’t know. But, unless I misinterpreted it, that seemed to be the indication in the ‘switch & bait’ portion of the article.The Voice of Experience calls back, " Fat chance ".
Upvote
0