Winning the war on drugs.

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
My research strongly suggests that the way to win the drug war is to focus on sequestering hard core addicts and other habitual users, as they are the weakest link in the drug business 'chain'. All other methods have been very expensive failures. Thoughts?
 

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
20,800
17,903
USA
✟951,619.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
During the riots I considered a mini escape to California. I looked at two areas whose demographic assured the same would not occur.

I realized I was trading one problem for another. It wasn’t a utopia. They have their dilemmas too. The difference is perception.

The local headache wasn’t privileged. They didn’t look the part and their antics made headlines. But the other does. Their behavior may be significantly worse. But no one bats an eye.

We’re not segregating addicts. We’re confining societal blights who lack the means to hide their mistakes. Putting them all together in one spot may do more harm than good.

Yours in His Service,

~bella
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Sparagmos
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
That's how a lot of rehabs already work. 4-6 weeks (or more) at some retreat center away from the area you're used to being in (since that familiarity often facilitates getting and using the drugs). It'll only even have the slightest chance of working if you therefore have a concrete plan to continue sequestering yourself after you complete the program, and even then that's only one prong in the overall approach to treatment.

So I'm not too optimistic about it, honestly.
 
Upvote 0

SigurdReginson

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2020
479
641
40
PNW
✟45,517.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
In a safe and secure hospital or clinical setting for a short period of time.

What does that mean, exactly?

How do we pay for that "setting?" What does their stay entail? How long is "a short period of time," and how do we know enough time has gone by? When are they ready for release?

People who abuse drugs have many different reasons why. Sometimes people are hooked instantly due to chemical addiction and just can't shake free. A large population of folks abuse drugs to self medicate and deal with their mental health issues (be it biochemical, or psychological, or both). Others do it to escape the crappy reality they have to endure every day with no meaningful help.

There have been systems that work that other countries have embraced... Why not utilize those? Sure, they aren't cheap, but they seem to work; they for sure work better than what we currently have.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bèlla
Upvote 0

Aussie Pete

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 14, 2019
9,081
8,285
Frankston
Visit site
✟727,630.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
My research strongly suggests that the way to win the drug war is to focus on sequestering hard core addicts and other habitual users, as they are the weakest link in the drug business 'chain'. All other methods have been very expensive failures. Thoughts?
That's one way, but I doubt that it would work. Sure, if there is no demand, there is no business for dealers. The problem is why people become addicts in the first place. It's primarily spiritual, although social pressures and ignorance play a part. If a person is spiritually satisfied (and that is achieved only by being born again) drugs lose their attraction. Physical addiction is much easier to resolve than psychological dependence.
 
Upvote 0

Kettriken

Active Member
Feb 10, 2020
368
233
36
Pennsylvania
✟41,816.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Private
I experimented with libertarianism at one point (it was college) and the idea one libertarian friend had was making all drugs of all kinds available completely free of charge in some kind of self-serve kiosk. The idea was for patients to take as much as they want (up to and including a fatal overdose for applicable substances if the patient wants it) with the caveat being that patients must stay in the kiosk until the effects have worn off.

That was the carrot.

The stick was epic draconian penalties for black market sales/distribution/possession/use. Instant bullet to the head, no questions asked.

The friend's idea was to essentially take a libertarian approach to legally executing both the users and the dealers.

That idea is one of the things that ultimately turned me off from libertarianism, incidentally. But I do admit that the libertarian approach would likely be effective. Not even remotely humane or moral but definitely effective.

Not to dissuade you from rejecting libertarianism, but that seems far more like an authoritarian response with an element of permissiveness. From what I know of libertarians, they would be in favor of allowing both drug sale and use, without any social supports to deal with the fallout or remedy the causes.

Some would caveat that with non-governmental charity programs. I could argue that it would be insufficient without the entire nation spontaneously finding Jesus, in which case it might be moot anyway.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Kettriken

Active Member
Feb 10, 2020
368
233
36
Pennsylvania
✟41,816.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Private
I'm not knocking faith-based programs, by any means, though there are some individual ones that I question. You are likely right. I was simply advocating for a broader approach as seems to be necessary for a wide-ranging country.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

Leading a blameless life
Jul 14, 2015
12,340
7,678
51
✟314,959.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
My research strongly suggests that the way to win the drug war is to focus on sequestering hard core addicts and other habitual users, as they are the weakest link in the drug business 'chain'. All other methods have been very expensive failures. Thoughts?
Treat it as a public health issue rather than a criminal issue. Legalise and regulate it. You can’t get rid of drugs but it can be controlled.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
What does that mean, exactly?

How do we pay for that "setting?" What does their stay entail? How long is "a short period of time," and how do we know enough time has gone by? When are they ready for release?

People who abuse drugs have many different reasons why. Sometimes people are hooked instantly due to chemical addiction and just can't shake free. A large population of folks abuse drugs to self medicate and deal with their mental health issues (be it biochemical, or psychological, or both). Others do it to escape the crappy reality they have to endure every day with no meaningful help.

There have been systems that work that other countries have embraced... Why not utilize those? Sure, they aren't cheap, but they seem to work; they for sure work better than what we currently have.

We transfer resources from ineffective areas of the drug war. I think 30 days in a safe, secure hospital or clinic is a good start. If they go back to using it's another 30 days, and so on. Of course some will go into treatment, most probably won't.

The drug business is like any other, product must be sold to the consumer, the user. Hard core addicts are the backbone of the money flow, consuming two-thirds of all illegal drugs sold. Sequester them for a time and the money flow stops. When this happens the whole drug enterprise collapses, from the coca leaf pickers to the gangs that sell the drugs on the street.

Every element of the drug trade will be quickly replaced by others if they are arrested or killed, from the lowest peasants, to the cartels, to the smugglers, the transporters, to the drug gangs the finally sell the drugs to the users. The only element that cannot be replaced are the users and addicts. Remove them from the mix and everything comes to a screeching halt.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That's one way, but I doubt that it would work. Sure, if there is no demand, there is no business for dealers. The problem is why people become addicts in the first place. It's primarily spiritual, although social pressures and ignorance play a part. If a person is spiritually satisfied (and that is achieved only by being born again) drugs lose their attraction. Physical addiction is much easier to resolve than psychological dependence.

The point isn't to save the addicts from their drug use, but to save the country from the drug trade and the destruction it wreaks on our nation and those that produce the drugs. The addicts are already casualties, but are the element that provides the money that supports the whole enterprise. In that sense the addicts are the actual "head" of the beast, not the producers or cartels. Cut off the head and the beast dies.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Treat it as a public health issue rather than a criminal issue. Legalise and regulate it. You can’t get rid of drugs but it can be controlled.

It is a public health issue, but also a crime issue. Addicts are notorious for stealing things, and prostituting themselves, to pay for their habit.

My plan focuses on interrupting the flow of money, which is much easier than trying to interrupt the flow of drugs. Without the flow of money the whole thing stops. Of course there will be the pill-poppers and casual users, a market that the cartels aren't really interested in. It's the hard-core addicts that use several times per day and pony up ten of thousands of dollars every year that we need to target. These addicts are well known to law enforcement, and to the local hospitals where they frequently turn up when they overdose ("frequent flyers" they are called). Detaining them for just a few days seriously interrupts the flow of money to the drug trade.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Larniavc

Leading a blameless life
Jul 14, 2015
12,340
7,678
51
✟314,959.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Addicts are notorious for stealing things, and prostituting themselves, to pay for their habit.
Because it is so expensive. If it was as costly as alcohol you would have the same amount of people doing prostitutions and criming for the money to buy vastly inflated price drugs as you would people who do a prostitution or a crime for booze money.

Significantly less.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

Leading a blameless life
Jul 14, 2015
12,340
7,678
51
✟314,959.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
It's the hard-core addicts that use several times per day and pony up ten of thousands of dollars every year that we need to target.
No no no. That has been tried for the last 40 or so years and has only made the Cartels massively wealthy.

Take the crime out of it, that stops the money flow. If you waved a wand and every current addicts was cured you’d have a new wave of addicts very quickly. Because the supply would still be their to temp kid into it.

Make drugs and alcohol the same legality and the problem of crime goes away because the substance is cheaper and less likely to be cut with with bleach.

When was the lasting anyone was guilty of alcohol supply crimes? Around the time it was legalised? Or was it around the time the alcohol pushers and dealers and smugglers went away?
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
No no no. That has been tried for the last 40 or so years and has only made the Cartels massively wealthy.

Take the crime out of it, that stops the money flow. If you waved a wand and every current addicts was cured you’d have a new wave of addicts very quickly. Because the supply would still be their to temp kid into it.

Make drugs and alcohol the same legality and the problem of crime goes away because the substance is cheaper and less likely to be cut with with bleach.

When was the lasting anyone was guilty of alcohol supply crimes? Around the time it was legalised? Or was it around the time the alcohol pushers and dealers and smugglers went away?

It's a race to the finish. Reducing the addicts reduces the drug supply and makes it very expensive. And no, it isn't easy to find more hard-core addicts, although it is easy to find casual and weekend users. However those customers don't pay the bills. The whole enterprise is built on hard core addicts that use several times each day and spend vast amount of money each year.

Just because a business some customers doesn't make it a viable business. You need repeat high-end spenders. These addicts are the low-hanging fruit of the drug war, and should be picked.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟982,622.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I watched a 'war on drugs' show recently. The addicts and users were milling around on a street corner waiting for their dealer to arrive. The cops were watching from nearby hoping to catch a sale going down. Both dealer and users were clever in hiding their transactions. Eventually the cops scored an arrest after many hours of watching.

What was telling is that this occurred early in the morning, was repeated around noon, then again in the late afternoon, and later in the evening as well, with many of the same customers present.

I was screaming at the tv, "Arrest the users you idiots". Leave the dealers alone. They will have no one to sell to. If you do arrest one another will be selling within the hour.

"No Virginia, there is no intelligent life on earth."
 
Upvote 0