STOP EXTREME GUN CONTROL BILL H.R. 127

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,703
2,813
Midwest
✟305,085.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It speaks very poorly of gun owners to say that they would resort to violence over what they see as bad law.
It speaks very poorly of a government who would go to extreme measures to nullify the 2nd Amendment and bait American citizens into civil unrest. The 2nd Amendment was good enough for our founding fathers so it’s good enough for me. Completely nullifying it would not be a good idea at all.
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,172
4,444
Washington State
✟311,671.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Try traveling after someone car jacks you at gun point (because only criminals will have guns).
How often has that happened? Even to people with guns in their cars?

A gun is not a powerup item in a video game that stops criminals. You still have to learn to use it, care for it, and even then you still need the opportunity to get it and use it.

The idea that guns stop criminals or even puts you on equal footing with an armed criminal is false.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It speaks very poorly of a government who would go to extreme measures to nullify the 2nd Amendment and bait American citizens into civil unrest. The 2nd Amendment was good enough for our founding fathers so it’s good enough for me. Completely nullifying it would not be a good idea at all.
A register of gun owners does not "nullify" the 2nd Amendment. There is nothing in that Amendment which confers a right to own guns in secret from the government.
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,703
2,813
Midwest
✟305,085.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Does the same go for the three-fifths clause?
Are you talking about the three-fifths compromise? Section 2 of the 4th Amendment later superseded this clause and explicitly repealed the compromise.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,703
2,813
Midwest
✟305,085.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A register of gun owners does not "nullify" the 2nd Amendment. There is nothing in that Amendment which confers a right to own guns in secret from the government.
I never said it did and I’ve been speaking hypothetically if the second amendment was ever nullified.
 
Upvote 0

Kentonio

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2018
7,467
10,458
48
Lyon
✟266,564.00
Country
France
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Those rights are also not protected by your AR-15. They are protected by the laws, government, law enforcement and military of your country. You just like to play predend that you having an obsolete, castrated weapon has any agency in that.

Bingo. The US continues to be the only civilized country with this bizarre delusion that they need a gun to feel safe.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Paulos23
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Bingo. The US continues to be the only civilized country with this bizarre delusion that they need a gun to feel safe.
It's perfectly understandable. The Christian Right regards the rest of us as a dangerous "other" rather than as fellow citizens whom it is possible for them to trust.
 
Upvote 0

Lg2000

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
227
267
41
L.A.
✟27,613.00
Faith
Christian
A register of gun owners does not "nullify" the 2nd Amendment. There is nothing in that Amendment which confers a right to own guns in secret from the government.
that’s all they do is fear monger and everything is tyranny . They so badly want to act like they are oppressed . If I had a nickel for how many times I heard
“ Obama’s going to take our guns and call for martial law “..........
We need more gun control not less. Lot of unstable people own guns who shouldn’t .
 
Upvote 0

Ancient of Days

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2017
1,136
860
Mn.
✟138,689.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
H.R.127: Is this Unconstitutional overreach from
authoritarian socialists bent on gun confiscation?
Text - H.R.127 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
-

STOP EXTREME GUN CONTROL BILL H.R. 127
jbs.org/alert/stop-extreme-gun-control-bill-h-r-127/

"Members of Congress are seeking to pass an extreme and unconstitutional
gun control bill that would effectively nullify the Second Amendment.

Here are the highlights of H.R. 127’s provisions:

It creates a national firearm registry that anyone – including every
level of law enforcement and the military – can access.

The registry would require one to tell the government exactly
where one’s firearms are stored.

One would need a license simply to own a firearm.
Mandatory “psychological evaluations” are required receive this license.

One would need to pay $800 for “firearm insurance.”

It would enact extreme ammunition restrictions, including
a ban on magazines more than 10 rounds.

Violating the above provisions could lead to a prison sentence
of up to 40 years and a fine of up to $150,000."

"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,703
2,813
Midwest
✟305,085.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I find it strange that Christians are continuously being lectured and belittled by liberals and even atheists on this Christian forum. o_O I don’t seem to run into that on other Christian forum sites.
 
Upvote 0

Ancient of Days

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2017
1,136
860
Mn.
✟138,689.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
that’s all they do is fear monger and everything is tyranny . They so badly want to act like they are oppressed . If I had a nickel for how many times I heard
“ Obama’s going to take our guns and call for martial law “..........
We need more gun control not less. Lot of unstable people own guns who shouldn’t .

The problem with your statement is that by the time you realize you were wrong it will be to late...
 
Upvote 0

Ancient of Days

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2017
1,136
860
Mn.
✟138,689.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I find it strange that Christians are continuously being lectured and belittled by liberals and even atheists on this Christian forum. o_O I don’t seem to run into that on other Christian forum sites.

You can thank the mods for that...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I find it strange that Christians are continuously being lectured and belittled by liberals and even atheists on this Christian forum. o_O I don’t seem to run into that on other Christian forum sites.
Maybe this site is just particularly popular with right-wing Christian populists who think they are the only "real" Christians. Because it is not Christians in general who are coming into criticism in this forum.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Belk
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
2,544
4,305
50
Florida
✟243,986.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I find it strange that Christians are continuously being lectured and belittled by liberals and even atheists on this Christian forum. o_O I don’t seem to run into that on other Christian forum sites.

There are areas of this forum where Christians can go to be lectured and belittled by only other Christians. No one is forcing you to read or participate in this specific forum.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vylo
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,172
4,444
Washington State
✟311,671.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I do find a lot of these requirements unnecessary.

H.R.127: Is this Unconstitutional overreach from
authoritarian socialists bent on gun confiscation?
Text - H.R.127 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
-

[snip]

Here are the highlights of H.R. 127’s provisions:

It creates a national firearm registry that anyone – including every
level of law enforcement and the military – can access.

That is excessive. A registry that would need a court order to search would be better.

The registry would require one to tell the government exactly
where one’s firearms are stored.

How much detail are they asking for here? Just the address? Or the exact safe in the basement? I don't think this is really needed.

One would need a license simply to own a firearm.
Mandatory “psychological evaluations” are required to receive this license.

A license with a corresponding test about firearm safety, storing firearms and ammo makes sense to me. Too many people don't learn how to handle or take care of a firearm. It would also help them learn the laws in their state.

I don't see how psychological evaluations would be done on such a scale in a timely manner.

One would need to pay $800 for “firearm insurance.”

I understand the idea behind this, but I don't think it should be mandatory. Stricter laws on 'accidental' gun discharges as well as holding the gun owner responsible for the gun (including reporting it if stolen, or if a kid gets a hold of it) could have the same effect without the insurance.

It would enact extreme ammunition restrictions, including
a ban on magazines more than 10 rounds.

Not sure these work. It would be better just to keep track of people that buy large amounts of ammo and have the stores report it to the FBI.

Violating the above provisions could lead to a prison sentence
of up to 40 years and a fine of up to $150,000."

40 years? This has no chance of passing.
 
Upvote 0