- Jul 22, 2014
- 41,496
- 7,861
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
This isn't what I wrote. I referred to Moralism, not morals,
First, our readers need to know where you are coming from in regards to this topic vs. where I am coming from on this topic.
You have stated in another thread,
“I think holiness is essential to crucial living. It is the fundamental ground of our fellowship with God. It is not, though, the ground of our relationship to Him. We can be saved without being holy but we cannot enjoy God without being holy.” ~ Quote by: Aiki.
“Overcoming sin is integral to the Christian life. But no one will ever overcome all sin in their life. This is why we need the perfect righteousness of Christ imputed to us.” ~ Quote by Aiki.
“Overcoming sin is integral to the Christian life. But no one will ever overcome all sin in their life. This is why we need the perfect righteousness of Christ imputed to us.” ~ Quote by Aiki.
Source:
Is it possible to be sinless for 5 seconds straight?
You appear to be believe that you can be saved without living holy based on your above quote. However, I believe the Bible teaches that without holiness, no man shall see the Lord (Hebrews 12:14). I believe that God has chosen us to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and a belief of the truth (Which is a call of the gospel) (See: 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14).
Second, as for the word Moralism:
Well, people define Moralism in several different ways.
Why Moralism Is Not the Gospel—And Why So Many Christians Think It Is
What is moralism? | GotQuestions.org
moralism
What is moralism? | GotQuestions.org
moralism
So it all depends on who you ask. So there doesn't appear to be an agreed upon set in stone meaning for Moralism. It can have a wide variety of meanings depending on who you ask.
When I hear the word “Moralism,” I take that as meaning that you need to uphold God's standard of Morality in order to be a part of God's good kingdom. George Sodini didn't have any morals. He thought that he could kill a bunch of people and take his own life and Jesus would forgive these future sins all because He trusted in Jesus alone for His salvation. So George Sodini was obviously for Anti-Moralism. In fact, anyone who thinks they do not have to hold to a standard of morality on some level based in God's Word is against Moralism. You said a believer does not have to live holy and yet they can be saved. This appears to be against God's morals or good ways. God would have to agree with sin in order to let allow them into His kingdom. But such a thing is impossible because God is holy, just, and good.
Side Note: To learn more about George Sodini, check out this link here:
O.S.A.S. – THE WATCHMAN'S CRY
You said:in the quotation from my post that you cited. I also took pains to define a particular type of fear:
"What is strong enough motivation to move me willingly - even joyfully - into the crucified life of Self-denial? Not fear. Though, many Christians often resort to this motive in living for God. I certainly used to live from this motive as a Christian. But, it isn't strong enough to produce consistent and joyful obedience to God. Instead, fearing God made me resent Him and mistrust Him. And it didn't produce for me a consistently holy life, either.
Because this is so, Scripture never encourages me to a motivation of fear in my walk with God. Now, by "fear" I mean a cowering terror of a dangerous, threatening power, not the reverential awe the Bible urges in me toward God. This cowering sort of fear is too weak to move me along properly as a child of God. No, God intends instead that LOVE should motivate my life with Him."
This is the popular candy coated version of fear within Christianity. But it is not what we read in the Bible.
Jesus says,
“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” (Matthew 10:28).
So are we not to have reverential awe in people who desire to kill us?
“Paul says, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.” (Philippians 2:12).
Why all the trembling if it is not talking about fear?
A great fear came upon the church when they heard of Ananias and Sapphira's death for lying to the Holy Spirit (See: Acts of the Apostles 5:1-11).
See if you think like a detective about what happened in the narrative of Ananias and Sapphira, the emotion of fear does not make any sense in the world of OSAS or Belief Alone-ism, or a Sin and Still Be Saved Type Belief of some kind. Fear only makes sense in this story if the body of believers knew that they could face the judgment or condemnation of God for committing a similar sin. But if OSAS or Belief Alone-ism is true, then the church should have either felt sorrow that they would miss their friends, and or they would have felt a sense of justice being done in that these might have been false believers. But that's not what we read in the Bible.
You said:And then I offered 1 John 4:16-19,
No doubt you are referring primarily to 1 John 4:18. For it is popular for those in the Belief Alone camp to quote this verse out of context. Here is what 1 John 4:18 says,
“There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.” (1 John 4:18).
So okay. How do you perfect love so as to cast out fear?
According to the Bible we read the answer here:
“But whoso keepeth his word, in him verily is the love of God perfected: hereby know we that we are in him. He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.” (1 John 2:5-6).
You said:Matthew 22:36-38
As for your quote of Matthew 22:36-38:
Most in the Belief Alone camp have no idea what this passage is really saying.
The full version of God's 1st greatest commandment is given to us in Mark 12:29-30.
Here is the passage for the FULL version of the 1st greatest commandment.
“Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.” (Mark 12:29-30).
This is a five part instruction for the 1st greatest commandment. It is one command, but it has a five part way we can obey it.
Part #1. Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord,
Part #2. Love the Lord your God with all your heart,
Part #3. Love the Lord your God with all your soul,
Part #4. Love the Lord your God with all your mind,
Part #5. Love the Lord your God with all your strength.
Part #2. Love the Lord your God with all your heart,
Part #3. Love the Lord your God with all your soul,
Part #4. Love the Lord your God with all your mind,
Part #5. Love the Lord your God with all your strength.
What is interesting is that Deuteronomy 6, and Deuteronomy 10 does not mention Part #4 that says to love the Lord your God with all your mind. So this was an added improvement by our Lord in Mark 12:29-30.
But if you believe in OSAS or Eternal Security, then the heart of the Christian life can potentially lead a person to not focus on the 1st greatest commandment. For if you are Once Saved Always Saved, then nothing you can ever do will ever change your salvation status. So it appears that loving God is merely optional if OSAS is in fact true. For you even said that one does not have to live holy and yet they can still be saved.
You said:and 1 Corinthians 13:1-3 as scriptural support for my comments, which you ignored.
Right, I believe this passage. I believe it does not profit me anything if I betow all my goods to feed the poor if I have not love in doing so. But you said you don't have to live holy and yet you can still be saved. So then... by this statement, a believer can bestow all their goods to the poor and not have love and they will still be profited in that they will be saved into God's Kingdom.
You said:As I already explained to you in an earlier post, in saying that righteousness isn't the primary end of the Christian life I am NOT saying it has no part in the Christian life at all. As I explained in my 3 opening posts, one cannot achieve the ultimate aim of Christian living - which is to know, love, enjoy and glorify God - without a holy, righteous life. I have no idea how you've missed this, except that your "axe-grinding" is crippling your ability to actually take in what others are saying.
Absolutely - which I point out several times in my first 3 posts! See post #55 in this thread.
You stated, I quote:
“Is holiness an end in itself? NO! It is just the means by which the Christian believer may "see God." Quote by: Aiki.
Yet, this contradicts the Bible. The reason Christ died for us was to sanctify us with the washing of the water of the Word so that Christ might present to Himself a church that is holy, and without blemish.
“...even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.” (Ephesians 5:25-27).
Jesus gave Himself so that He might redeem us from us from all iniquity and so that we might be zealous of good works.
“Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works” (Titus 2:14).
Yet, you said believers will always have sin in their life (Note: If you desire to discuss this statement with me further, I can only discuss it with you on overcoming mortal sin or grievous sin in this life because “Sinless Perfection” is not allowed to be discussed in this section of the forums; For I believe that Christians must overcome mortal sin at some point in their life in order to be saved (After they are saved by God's grace)).
Anyways, is holiness the end?
The Bible appears to also answer this question with a “yes” in this verse here:
“Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.” (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
Last edited:
Upvote
0