- Aug 3, 2003
- 24,732
- 7,790
- 43
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
deleted
- Thread starter Vylo
- Start date
Upvote
0
durangodawood
Dis Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 23,571
- 15,714
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Not sure where the rules against discussing west-of-W come down.
On the one hand we dont want to validate the nonsense by taking its claims seriously in any way.
On the other, west-of-W is clearly a force in contemporary right-wing "thinking", and it would be negligent to ignore it as a motivating phenomenon or symptom of media siloing. I mean, we have congress people who believe this stuff - or claim they used to.
On the one hand we dont want to validate the nonsense by taking its claims seriously in any way.
On the other, west-of-W is clearly a force in contemporary right-wing "thinking", and it would be negligent to ignore it as a motivating phenomenon or symptom of media siloing. I mean, we have congress people who believe this stuff - or claim they used to.
Upvote
0
pgp_protector
Noted strange person
- Dec 17, 2003
- 51,706
- 17,624
- 55
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
- Dec 1, 2011
- 20,376
- 16,352
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
- Aug 3, 2003
- 24,732
- 7,790
- 43
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Ah, there is no actual discussion of their theories in the article, so I'm not sure how that works out.
Upvote
0
pgp_protector
Noted strange person
- Dec 17, 2003
- 51,706
- 17,624
- 55
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
- Dec 1, 2011
- 20,376
- 16,352
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
durangodawood
Dis Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 23,571
- 15,714
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Sure lets NOT discuss the contents or merit of the Q nonsense claims.
But absolutely Q is a motivating force in American politics, even among some congress people. So it would be negligent to forbid mentioning it in the abstract.
Upvote
0
- Aug 3, 2003
- 24,732
- 7,790
- 43
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
So while the topic of this thread had to be deleted per the rules, the subject was actually how those who attacked the capitol awaked the largest security apparatus in the world. Basically certain people who must remain unnamed, and other rioters were under the radar of the the FBI/CIA/DHS etc., are now very much on their radar. their actions have brought down the hammer, and while I've seen many high profile people get hit, it is now spreading to the minor folk seen inside the capitol building. It seems they are going to try and catch them all. basically once you touched the steps or the wall of the capitol, you are fair game.
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
SimplyMe
Senior Veteran
- Jul 19, 2003
- 9,706
- 9,431
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I'm curious, based on the reports of members of Congress giving tours to those who "stormed" the Capitol, also the claims that some member were Tweeting the locations they were being held (with some claiming they did it to help those rioters to find particular members of Congress), just what Congressional members are being investigated and what discipline/punishments they may face.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
