- Apr 5, 2007
- 140,185
- 25,222
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Right. He needed a sword.Yes, he requests a weapon, and yet he is clearly pleased with that sword being available.
Upvote
0
Right. He needed a sword.Yes, he requests a weapon, and yet he is clearly pleased with that sword being available.
Are you sure? Is that what he needed at that moment? Your responses seem to lack any insight,Right. He needed a sword.
I’m sure because that’s what’s implied for the text. You are wanting to read something into it that can’t be supported.Are you sure? Is that what he needed at that moment? Your responses seem to lack any insight,
but someone may appreciate you stating the obvious, so thanks for the contribution to the discussion.
So the point was, David wanted a sword, David got a sword. Check. I'll leave it at that for now. Thanks.I’m sure because that’s what’s implied for the text.
1 Samuel 21:
8 And David said to Ahimelech, Is there not here on hand a spear or a sword?
For I have brought neither my sword nor my weapons with me, because the king’s
business required haste.
9 So the priest said, The sword of Goliath the Philistine, whom you killed in the Valley
of Elah, there it is, wrapped in a cloth behind the ephod. If you will take that, take it.
For there is no other except that one here.
And David said, There is none like it; give it to me.
Why was David so impressed with the sword of Goliath?
Do you detect a hint of covetousness in his statement?
Did he not realize that as a boy he had wielded a giant’s weapon
only by the power of the Spirit of the Lord?
What were the consequences of his taking possession of this mighty weapon?
I'm having a disconnect with does 1+1=2 vs what does 2 mean?True. One child survived named Abiathar, who took refuge with David.
Saul knew because of the report from Doeg the Edomite. Let's revisit that.
1 Samuel 21:
7 Now a certain man of the servants of Saul was there that day, detained before the Lord.
And his name was Doeg, an Edomite, the chief of the herdsmen who belonged to Saul.
Notice it says that he was detained "before the Lord", which allowed him to witness the
event. Does this suggest that his witness was of the Lord?
Proverbs 19:21. Many are the plans in the mind of a man,I'm having a disconnect with does 1+1=2 vs what does 2 mean?
I guess my first question is how can I apply this later?
The purpose of the Lord, what has the Lord purposed us to do based on the implied lesson in the OP?Proverbs 19:21. Many are the plans in the mind of a man,
but it is the purpose of the LORD that will stand.
David was in a difficult situation. He requested a weapon. He was offered Goliath's sword,The purpose of the Lord, what has the Lord purposed us to do based on the implied lesson in the OP?
So asking for bread, not a big deal and the lesson is god desires mercy not sacrifice.David was in a difficult situation. He requested a weapon. He was offered Goliath's sword,
which was stored behind an ephod, by which the priest could have enquired of the Lord on
his behalf. David does not enquire of the Lord. There were tragic consequences...
I am being told that I am reading things into the narrative, but surely there is a lesson for us
in the scriptures. Maybe you can find something and let me know.
This is immediately preceded by David asking the same priest for bread. Using this standard, I can only concludeavid needed bread, David asked for bread, David got bread. And yet this narrative comes
up in the Gospels. Yeshua teaches a lesson. Is it clear to us? Why does He say David went into the
house of God of Abiathar the high priest? Questions worth seeking an answer for, because The Lord
uses these OT examples as lessons.
Mark 2:
23 Now it happened that He went through the grainfields on the Sabbath; and as they went His
disciples began to pluck the heads of grain.
24 And the Pharisees said to Him, “Look, why do they do what is not lawful on the Sabbath?”
25 But He said to them, “Have you never read what David did when he was in need and hungry,
he and those with him: (1 Samuel 21).
26 how he went into the house of God of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the showbread, which
is not lawful to eat except for the priests, and also gave some to those who were with him?”
The bread was a big deal, as the priest was carrying sanctified bread from the Lord's Sanctuary.So asking for bread, not a big deal and the lesson is god desires mercy not sacrifice.
This is not simply saying a prayer.But asking for sword, a big deal because he didn't pray first.
Lesson from this post is, if acquiring deadly weaponry to protect yourself - pray first.
I'll reflect on that, praying before everyone is indeed important - and it is not written in the text whether David prayed or didn't pray - it simply isn't written.
Got it, pray instead of using an elaborate, man-made, intimidating, carnal weapon like words out-of-the-mouth. (known as a "sword" in the Bible)David was in a difficult situation. He requested a weapon. He was offered Goliath's sword,
which was stored behind an ephod, by which the priest could have enquired of the Lord on
his behalf. David does not enquire of the Lord. There were tragic consequences...
I am being told that I am reading things into the narrative, but surely there is a lesson for us
in the scriptures. Maybe you can find something and let me know.
This is immediately preceded by David asking the same priest for bread. Using this standard, I can only concludeavid needed bread, David asked for bread, David got bread. And yet this narrative comes
up in the Gospels. Yeshua teaches a lesson. Is it clear to us? Why does He say David went into the
house of God of Abiathar the high priest? Questions worth seeking an answer for, because The Lord
uses these OT examples as lessons.
Mark 2:
23 Now it happened that He went through the grainfields on the Sabbath; and as they went His
disciples began to pluck the heads of grain.
24 And the Pharisees said to Him, “Look, why do they do what is not lawful on the Sabbath?”
25 But He said to them, “Have you never read what David did when he was in need and hungry,
he and those with him: (1 Samuel 21).
26 how he went into the house of God of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the showbread, which
is not lawful to eat except for the priests, and also gave some to those who were with him?”
I’m glad you get it now.So the point was, David wanted a sword, David got a sword. Check. I'll leave it at that for now. Thanks.
What would I do without you.I’m glad you get it now.
Many have asked that same question.What would I do without you.
What happens when they find out there is a man behind the curtain?Many have asked that same question.
Shhhh!What happens when they find out there is a man behind the curtain?
In any case, the scripture does say that David was found blameless in every matter except for that one where he had sex with another man's wife and then had him killed.The bread was a big deal, as the priest was carrying sanctified bread from the Lord's Sanctuary.
Yeshua uses this as a lesson in the Gospels.
This is not simply saying a prayer.
In the scriptures, whenever David enquired of the Lord, by ephod or by prophet, the Lord
responded to Him. In this circumstance, the priest had an ephod, but David did not enquire of the Lord, or the narrative would have provided the instructions, as they always do.
Not simply because of deadly weaponry, but because David's circumstances were dire.
His actions led to that village being destroyed, so there is some purpose resulting.
The Lord's purpose is what we seek in the narrative of scriptures.
There is so much more to these events.
For example, there are at least two Psalms that came out from this experience.
I haven't imagined anything.
The point of the OP is to seek and find from the scriptures.
You expect to see, 1 +1 = 2. I have never found that to be the case.
I wish you well in the seeking, and finding.
Proverbs 25:2. It is the glory of God to conceal a matter,
But the glory of kings is to search out a matter.
As I said, there remains much to tell in this story.In any case, the scripture does say that David was found blameless in every matter except for that one where he had sex with another man's wife and then had him killed.
So there's nothing to find.
We have a similar thing today.The repercussions of seeking a weapon rather than enquiring of the Lord continued beyond
David's lifetime.