Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
It was a positional change for humans not a change in God or Christ. From two to one, grafted in, but containing branches that the gardening either has an ax to or pruning shears.

Those who are grafted in have the privilege of also following the laws that were given to those who are in and should not follow the example of disobedience to the laws of those whom the gardener has taken an ax. In 1 Peter 2:9-10, Gentile are included as part of God's chosen people, a holy nation, a royal priesthood, and a treasure of God's own possession, which are terms that describe Israel (Deuteronomy 7:6), so Gentiles also have the delight of getting to follow the laws that God gave for how to fulfill those roles. There is not much sense in a Gentile wanting to become grafted into a holy nation while wanting nothing to do with following God's laws for how to live as part of a holy nation.
 
Upvote 0

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,347.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Those who are grafted in have the privilege of also following the laws that were given to those who are in and should not follow the example of disobedience to the laws of those whom the gardener has taken an ax. In 1 Peter 2:9-10, Gentile are included as part of God's chosen people, a holy nation, a royal priesthood, and a treasure of God's own possession, which are terms that describe Israel (Deuteronomy 7:6), so Gentiles also have the delight of getting to follow the laws that God gave for how to fulfill those roles. There is not much sense in a Gentile wanting to become grafted into a holy nation while wanting nothing to do with following God's laws for how to live as part of a holy nation.
Well that was the whole logic of Paul’s letters, I don’t know where he recommended becoming a Pharisee again. And basically all of Paul’s converts were adherents to the temple when it was still there.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Well that was the whole logic of Paul’s letters, I don’t know where he recommended become a Pharisee again. And basically all of Paul’s converts were adherents to the temple when it was still there.

Jesus set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, so he was much more zealous for obedience to it than the Pharisees were. Jesus never criticized the Pharisees for obeying the Mosaic Law, but he did criticize them for their hypocrisy in order to call them into a fuller obedience to it. For example:

Matthew 23:23 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others.

He said tithing was something they ought to have been doing without neglecting weightier matters of the law, so he was not opposing their obedience to the Mosaic Law, but rather he was calling them to a fuller obedience to it. In Matthew 23:1-4, Jesus instructed the crowds and his disciples to do whatever the Pharisees tell them, but warned against their hypocrisy. In the debate between Hillel and Shammai, Jesus almost always sided with Hillel.

Paul never stopped identifying as a Pharisee (Acts 23:6), so most of the NT was written by a Pharisee and in 1 Corinthians 11:1, he instructed us to follow his example as he followed Christ's example, so we are instructed to follow the example of a Pharisee.
 
Upvote 0

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,347.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Jesus set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, so he was much more zealous for obedience to it than the Pharisees were. Jesus never criticized the Pharisees for obeying the Mosaic Law, but he did criticize them for their hypocrisy in order to call them into a fuller obedience to it. For example:

Matthew 23:23 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others.

He said tithing was something they ought to have been doing without neglecting weightier matters of the law, so he was not opposing their obedience to the Mosaic Law, but rather he was calling them to a fuller obedience to it. In Matthew 23:1-4, Jesus instructed the crowds and his disciples to do whatever the Pharisees tell them, but warned against their hypocrisy. In the debate between Hillel and Shammai, Jesus almost always sided with Hillel.

Paul never stopped identifying as a Pharisee (Acts 23:6), so most of the NT was written by a Pharisee and in 1 Corinthians 11:1, he instructed us to follow his example as he followed Christ's example, so we are instructed to follow the example of a Pharisee.
I’m thinking the continuity is in the Nazarite not the pharisee.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Time to leave the Mosaic "shadow laws" for remission of sins under the old covenant (Sanctuary laws and the laws for the Levitical Priesthood, animal sacrifices and sin offerings and Feast days). They are fulfilled in the new covenant based on better promises *Hebrews 8:6 in Jesus as God's sacrifice for sin for all mankind *John 1:29; 36 and the work now being done by Jesus as our great high Priest in God's Sanctuary made without hands of which the earthly was only a copy of things to come *Hebrews 7:1-28; Hebrews 8:1-13; Hebrews 9:1-28 and Hebrews 10:1-17 etc.. We are in the new covenant now not the old. To live in the old is to deny the new and that to which the old pointed to - JESUS and his death for all mankind.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,381
Sydney, Australia.
✟244,844.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Jesus did not establish the New Covenant in order to undermine anything that he spent his ministry teaching by word or by example, but rather the New Covenant is made with the same God with the same nature and the same laws for how to testify about His nature. If the way to testify about God's nature were to change when the New Covenant was made, then God's nature would not be eternal.
Jesus was circumcised. The Mosaic law specifies that you must be circumcised. If a Gentile is not circumcised, then a Gentile is not bound by the Mosaic covenant, therefore a Gentile is not under the law of Moses.

Further, Jesus distinctly said that; not one letter of the law will pass until all is accomplished. If circumcision has passed, then all has been accomplished. Jesus fulfilled everything the law demanded, but most especially the moral law. If you continue to fail to see the moral law as the shadow. Then you have an alternate Gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Jesus was circumcised. The Mosaic law specifies that you must be circumcised. If a Gentile is not circumcised, then a Gentile is not bound by the Mosaic covenant, therefore a Gentile is not under the law of Moses.

Further, Jesus distinctly said that; not one letter of the law will pass until all is accomplished. If circumcision has passed, then all has been accomplished. Jesus fulfilled everything the law demanded, but most especially the moral law. If you continue to fail to see the moral law as the shadow. Then you have an alternate Gospel.

Heaven and earth have not passed away, not everything has been accomplished, and no letter has passed from the law. Jesus was one of many who fulfilled the law by teaching how to obey it by word and by example. The way to testify about God's nature is straightforwardly based on God's nature, not on any particular covenant, and God's nature is eternal, so any instructions that God has ever given for how to testify about His nature are eternally valid regardless of which covenant we are under. The only way for instructions for how to testify about God's nature to pass away is for God to first pass away.

Jesus began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand (Matthew 4:17-23), and the Mosaic Law was how his audience knew what sin is, so repenting from our disobedience to it is an integral part of the Gospel of the Kingdom, which Jesus prophesied would be proclaimed to the nations (Matthew 24:12-14). The same goes for how Peter's audience knew what sin is when he told them to repent for the forgiveness of sin in Acts 2:38. In Romans 15:4, Paul said OT writings are for our instruction and in 15:18-19, his Gospel message involved bringing the Gentiles to full obedience in word and in deed, so his Gospel was on the same page in regard to teaching repentance from our sins.

Either there are right and wrong reasons for someone to become circumcised and Paul only spoke against becoming circumcised for the wrong reasons, or according to Galatians 5:2, Paul caused Christ to be of no value to Timothy (Acts 16:3), and Christ is of no value to roughly 80% of the men in the US who have been circumcised. In Acts 15:1, they were wanting to require all Gentiles to become circumcised in order to become saved, however, that was never the purpose for which God commanded circumcision, so the problem was that circumcision was being used from a man-made purpose that went above and beyond the purpose for which God commanded it. The the Jerusalem Council upheld the Mosaic Law by correctly ruling against that requirement, and a ruling against becoming circumcised for the wrong reason should not be mistaken as being a ruling against obeying what God has commanded, as if the Jerusalem Council had the authority to countermand and abolish God.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Quoting Hebrews 10 to say that is to ignore the rest of the content of Hebrews.

In Deuteronomy 13:4-5, the way that God instructed His people to determine whether someone was a false prophet who was not speaking for Him was if they taught against obeying the Mosaic Law, so if you think that the author of Hebrews tried to do that, then you should be quicker to disregard what they said than to disregard what God has commanded, but they never did that.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Citizen of the Kingdom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 31, 2006
44,346
14,507
Vancouver
Visit site
✟311,347.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In Deuteronomy 13:4-5, the way that God instructed His people to determine whether someone was a false prophet who was not speaking for Him was if they taught against obeying the Mosaic Law, so if you think that the author of Hebrews tried to do that, then you should be quicker to disregard what they said than to disregard what God has commanded, but they never did that.
I’d rather not disregard any scripture as it distorts the view.
 
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
I’d rather not disregard any scripture as it distorts the view.

You would rather disregard what God has said than to disregard the book of Hebrews?

I don't think think that there is a conflict between what the book of Hebrews says and what God has commanded, so I don't think that either should be disregarded, but if you think that the author of Hebrew was speaking against obeying what God has commanded, then it shouldn't be difficult to determine which one has the higher authority and which one to follow.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You would rather disregard what God has said than to disregard the book of Hebrews?

I don't think think that there is a conflict between what the book of Hebrews says and what God has commanded, so I don't think that either should be disregarded, but if you think that the author of Hebrew was speaking against obeying what God has commanded, then it shouldn't be difficult to determine which one has the higher authority and which one to follow.
Disregarding the book of Hebrews and the rest of the new testament scriptures that the old covenant scriptures point to, is disregarding what God says. The new covenant is not in contradiction to the old covenant. Together they are the two great witnesses that make up the Word of God the point to Jesus the living Word of God *John 1:1-4 and God's plan of salvation for all mankind *Hebrews 7:1-28; Hebrews 8:1-13; Hebrews 9:1-28 and Hebrews 10:1-17 etc.. Time to leave the shadows. We are in the new covenant now not the old.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Disregarding the book of Hebrews and the rest of the new testament scriptures is disregarding what God says. Time to leave the shadows. We are in the new covenant now not the old.

In Deuteronomy 13:4-5, the way that God instructed His people to determine that someone is a false prophet who was not speaking for Him was if they taught against obeying the Mosaic Law, even if they performed signs and wonders, so God simply did not give His people any room to follow someone who does that. I don't think that the book of Hebrews or the rest of the NT Scriptures do that, so I am not saying that we should disregard them, but if someone thinks that they did speak against obeying God, then disregarding them would be acting in accordance with what God has commanded. Sadly, Christians who teach that Jesus did away with God's law are one of the biggest reasons why Jews have rejected Jesus as their Messiah, and if Jesus had done that, then by rejecting him, they would be acting in accordance with what God has commanded them to do. While I agree that we are in the New Covenant and not the Mosaic Covenant, we are nevertheless still under the same God with the same nature and therefore the same laws for how to testify about His nature (Hebrews 8:10). Regardless of which covenant someone is under, if any, we are all obligated live in a way that testifies about God's eternal nature by obeying His laws instead of a way that bears false witness against God.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
In Deuteronomy 13:4-5, the way that God instructed His people to determine that someone is a false prophet who was not speaking for Him was if they taught against obeying the Mosaic Law, even if they performed signs and wonders, so God simply did not give His people any room to follow someone who does that. I don't think that the book of Hebrews or the rest of the NT Scriptures do that, so I am not saying that we should disregard them, but if someone thinks that they did speak against obeying God, then disregarding them would be acting in accordance with what God has commanded. Sadly, Christians who teach that Jesus did away with God's law are one of the biggest reasons why Jews have rejected Jesus as their Messiah, and if Jesus had done that, then by rejecting him, they would be acting in accordance with what God has commanded them to do. While I agree that we are in the New Covenant and not the Mosaic Covenant, we are nevertheless still under the same God with the same nature and therefore the same laws for how to testify about His nature (Hebrews 8:10). Regardless of which covenant someone is under, if any, we are all obligated live in a way that testifies about God's eternal nature by obeying His laws instead of a way that bears false witness against God.
The new covenant does not tell us to continue in the "shadow laws" of the old covenant for remission of sins (Sanctuary laws, Levitical Priesthood laws, laws for remission of sins, and some of the annual Feast days) *Hebrews 10:1-27. Do you still do animal sacrifices for your sins and seek the services of a Levitical Priest in an earthly Sanctuary?

For new covenant believers the shadows law for remission of sins have passed away and the heavenly is here. This is the true temple which God pitched and not man *Hebrews 8:1-5 of which the earthly was only a copy and our true Hight Priest is now Jesus of the order of Melchizedek meaning King and Priest *Hebrews 7:1-28 who provides His own sacrifice for the sins of the world *1 Peter 1:18-19; Romans 5:6-10; 1 Corinthians 11:23-27; 1 John 2:2; John 15:13; Ephesians 5:2; Hebrews 9:26; 1 Peter 2:23-24; 2 Corinthians 5:21; Matthew 26:27-28; John 3:16; Ephesians 1:7; Romans 5:1; Colossians 1:21-22; Hebrews 9:12-14; Hebrews 10:8-14; 18; 1 John 4:10; Isaiah 53:4-7; 2 Corinthians 5:18-19; Ephesians 2:18; John 1:29; 36; Hebrews 10:1-18; Hebrews 10:26-31; Revelation 13:8.

To continue in the old covenant laws for remission of sins would be to deny the very God these laws pointed to, now that what those laws pointed to has now arrived. *Hebrews 10:26-27; Hebrews 7:1-28; Hebrews 8:1-13; Hebrews 9:1-28 and Hebrews 10:1-17 etc.. We do not testify of the nature of God by denying his Word and denying the very Christ those shadow laws pointed to. This was the same mistake the Scribes and Pharisees made according to the very Words of Jesus in John 5:39.

It is time to leave the shadows dear friend. We are in the new covenant now not the old.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
The new covenant does not tell us to continue in the "shadow laws" of the old covenant for remission of sins (Sanctuary laws, Levitical Priesthood laws, laws for remission of sins, and some of the annual Feast days) *Hebrews 10:1-27. Do you still do animal sacrifices for your sins and seek the services of a Levitical Priest and where is your temple? Mine is in heaven and is the true temple which God pitched and not man *Hebrews 8:1-5 of which the earthly was only a copy and my Priest is of the order of Melchizedek meaning King and Priest. Not continue in the old covenant laws for remission of sins would be to deny the very God these laws pointed to, now that what those laws pointed to has now arrived. *Hebrews 7:1-28; Hebrews 8:1-13; Hebrews 9:1-28 and Hebrews 10:1-17 etc.. We do not testify of the nature of God by denying his Word and denying the very Christ those shadow laws pointed to. This was the same mistake the Scribes and Pharisees made according to Jesus in John 5:39. We are in the new covenant now not the old. It is time to leave the shadows when that which they point to has arrived. "Who serve to the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, said he, that you make all things according to the pattern showed to you in the mount. But now has he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises." - Hebrews 8:5-6

God has commended His people to keep foreshadow laws, so if you think that the author of the book of Hebrews was speaking against keeping them, then you need to make a decision about which one has the higher authority and which one to follow. Again, in Deuteronomy 13:4-5, God did not give His people any room to follow anyone speaking against obeying any of His laws, so if you think that is what the author of Hebrews was doing, then according do God, you should disregard the book of Hebrews as being written by a false prophet.

God is trustworthy, therefore His law is also trustworthy (Psalms 19:7, Nehemiah 9:13), and a law that isn't trustworthy can't come from a God who is trustworthy, so you can't trust God while treating His law as being untrustworthy. The New Covenant does not make any exceptions for not keeping "shadow laws". In Colossians 2:16-17, Paul was encouraging them to continue keeping God's holy days because they are important foreshadows of what is to come and to not let anyone judge them for keeping them.

Again, we should live in a way that testifies about the heavenly pattern by structuring every aspect of our lives around that pattern in accordance with what God's law instructs rather than a way that bears false witness against it. To keep God's laws is to testify that what they say about Jesus is true while to refuse to keep them is to deny that what they say about Jesus is true.

In Acts 18:18, Paul took a Nazarite vow, which involved making sin offerings (Numbers 6) and in Acts 21:20-24, Paul was on his way to pay for and join the purification rites of others who had taken a similar vow in order to disprove false rumors that he was teaching against the Mosaic Law and to show that he continued to live in obedience to it. In Hebrews 8:4, it speaks about offerings that were still being made in accordance with the Mosaic Law. Furthermore, it says that Jesus would not be a priest if he were still on earth, and if the Mosaic Law were no longer in effect, then it would have no power to do prevent that. So offerings did not stop with the death or resurrection of Jesus, but only stopped because of the destruction of the temple. However, the Bible prophesies of a time when a third temple will be built and when offerings will resume, so those laws have not gone anywhere (Ezekiel 44-46).
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
God has commended His people to keep foreshadow laws, so if you think that the author of the book of Hebrews was speaking against keeping them, then you need to make a decision about which one has the higher authority and which one to follow. Again, in Deuteronomy 13:4-5, God did not give His people any room to follow anyone speaking against obeying any of His laws, so if you think that is what the author of Hebrews was doing, then according do God, you should disregard the book of Hebrews as being written by a false prophet.

God is trustworthy, therefore His law is also trustworthy (Psalms 19:7, Nehemiah 9:13), and a law that isn't trustworthy can't come from a God who is trustworthy, so you can't trust God while treating His law as being untrustworthy. The New Covenant does not make any exceptions for not keeping "shadow laws". In Colossians 2:16-17, Paul was encouraging them to continue keeping God's holy days because they are important foreshadows of what is to come and to not let anyone judge them for keeping them.

Again, we should live in a way that testifies about the heavenly pattern by structuring every aspect of our lives around that pattern in accordance with what God's law instructs rather than a way that bears false witness against it. To keep God's laws is to testify that what they say about Jesus is true while to refuse to keep them is to deny that what they say about Jesus is true.

In Acts 18:18, Paul took a Nazarite vow, which involved making sin offerings (Numbers 6) and in Acts 21:20-24, Paul was on his way to pay for and join the purification rites of others who had taken a similar vow in order to disprove false rumors that he was teaching against the Mosaic Law and to show that he continued to live in obedience to it. In Hebrews 8:4, it speaks about offerings that were still being made in accordance with the Mosaic Law. Furthermore, it says that Jesus would not be a priest if he were still on earth, and if the Mosaic Law were no longer in effect, then it would have no power to do prevent that. So offerings did not stop with the death or resurrection of Jesus, but only stopped because of the destruction of the temple. However, the Bible prophesies of a time when a third temple will be built and when offerings will resume, so those laws have not gone anywhere (Ezekiel 44-46).

The scriptures dear friend in the post you are quoting from show that God does not command his people to keep the "shadow laws" for remission of sin. Like "circumcision" these shadow are not a requirement under the new covenant *Acts of the Apostles 15:1-24, as Paul says "circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the commandments of God *1 Corinthians 7:19.

You did not address anything in the post you were responding to and the scriptures that disagree with you accept to provide old covenant scripture to try and support the practice of the "shadow law" for remission of sins, not God's 10 commandments that are the standard of righteousness if obeyed and sin if disobeyed. It is the old covenant "shadow laws" for remission of sin however, that the scriptures teach have been fulfilled in Jesus as the Savior of the World. You know as well as I do dear friend that I am talking about the "shadow laws" for remission of sin right? So why try and change the topic to other laws we are not discussing?

What was it in this post that you addressed in the post you are responding to? -Not a thing.

The rest of your post here is only more repetition. Again as posted earlier, Paul states in Colossians 2:17 in context to Colossians 2:16 and the annual Feasts that they are shadows of the things to come; but the body is Christ's. Not all the Feast have their complete fulfillment (eg. Day of atonement - Yom Kippur; Feast of Tabernacles or booths - Sukkot; Feast of week - Shavuot ) as Jesus has not returned. Some feats have their fulfillment in the body of Christ to which they pointed to (Passover and Feast of Firstfruits) *1 Corinthians 5:7-8; 1 Corinthians 15:20 etc.

Paul in Hebrews 10:1 is showing that the old testament laws for remission of sins were shadows of good things to come and says " For the law having a shadow of the good things to come, not the very image of the things, can never with the same sacrifices year by year, which they offer continually, make perfect them that draw nigh. Then goes on to show in Hebrews 10:2-10 how these laws are "fulfilled" in Christ.

These scriptures show that the "shadow laws" for remission of sins from the old covenant are fulfilled in "the body of Christ" in the new covenant and to be continued in Him who loved us and washed us in His own blood. They also show that there are others to be fulfilled in the future as posted above.

The new covenant does not tell us to continue in the "shadow laws" of the old covenant for remission of sins (Sanctuary laws, Levitical Priesthood laws, laws for remission of sins, and some of the annual Feast days) *Hebrews 10:1-27. Do you still do animal sacrifices every time you sin and seek the services of a Levitical Priest in an earthly Sanctuary?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I know that a lot of well-known people on these forums are trying to "prove" you wrong. You got it exactly right. I've hear this same revelation from other mighty men of God. You are clearly on the right track and these people trying to "prove" you wrong are acting like total hypocrites by blaming you for misquoting scripture and yet misquoting scripture themselves.
Who are you talking to and why?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Soyeong

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2015
12,433
4,605
Hudson
✟283,922.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
This was the same mistake the Scribes and Pharisees made according to the very Words of Jesus in John 5:39.

God's law is His instructions for how to testy about his nature and how to thereby experientially come to know Him, or in other words grow in a relationship with Him. In Jeremiah 9:3 and 9:6, they did not experientially know God and refuse to know Him, because in 9:13, they had forsaken the Mosaic Law, while in Jeremiah 9:24, those who experientially know God know that he delights in practicing steadfast love, justice, and righteousness in all of the earth, so delighting in expressing those and other aspects of God's nature is the way to grow in a relationship with God. In Romans 6:23, eternal life in Christ is the gift of God, in John 6:40, those who believe in Jesus will haver eternal life, in John 17:3, eternal life is knowing God and Jesus, and in Matthew 19:17, the way to enter eternal life is by obeying God's commandments, so obedience to God's commandments is itself part of the content of God's gift and what it looks like to believe in Jesus and to grow in a relationship with him. In 1 John 2:4, those who say that they know Jesus, but don't obey His commandments are liars and the truth is not in them, and in 1 John 3:4, sin is the transgression of God's law, and those who continue to practice sin have neither seen nor known him. In Matthew 7:23, Jesus said that he would tell those who are workers of lawlessness to depart from him because he never knew them, so the goal of the law is to teach us how to express God's nature and how to thereby grow in a relationship with Christ, who is the exact expression of God's nature (Hebrews 1:3)

However, people can obey the law while missing the goal of the law, such as in John 5:39-40. Jesus said that they searched the Scripture because they think that in it they will find eternal life, and they testify about him, yet they refuse to come to him that they might have life. In Matthew 19:17, the way to enter eternal life is by obeying God's commandments, so eternal life can be found in the Scriptures and the Pharisees were correct to search for it there, but they needed to realize that a relationship with Christ is the goal of the law and come to him for eternal life. In Romans 9:30-10:4, the Israelites had a zeal for God, but it was not based on knowledge because they didn't understand that a relationship with Jesus is the goal of the law for righteousness for everyone who has faith. So they failed to attain righteousness because they pursued the law as though righteousness were by works in an effort to establish their own instead of pursuing the law as though righteousness were by faith in Christ. In Matthew 23:23, Jesus said that tithing was something that they ought to be doing while not neglecting weightier matters of the law of justice, mercy, and faithfulness, so expressing the weightier matters is how we reach the goal of the law of knowing Christ. In Philippians 3:8, Paul had been in the same boat where he was keeping the law, but without having a focus on knowing Christ, so he had been missing the whole goal of the law and counted it all as rubbish.

So the problem in John 5:39-40 was not that they were still keeping laws that foreshadow and testify of Christ, but rather they were neglecting the weightier matters of the law that foreshadowed and testified of Christ.

It is time to leave the shadows dear friend. We are in the new covenant now not the old.

I have never once stated that we are not under the New Covenant or that we are under the Mosaic Covenant, but rather I have been speaking about how we should live under the New Covenant.

You did not address anything in the post you are responding to and the scriptures that disagree with you accept to provide old covenant scripture to try and support the practice of the "shadow law" for remission of sins, that have been fulfilled in Jesus as the Savior of the World. You know as well as I do dear friend that I am talking about the "shadow laws" for remission of sin right?

Yes, I am speaking about the laws that foreshadow and testify about Christ.

"To fulfill the law" means "to cause God's will as made known in His law to be obeyed as it should be” (NAS Greek Lexicon pleroo 2c3). After Jesus said he came to fulfill the law in Matthew 5, he proceeded to fulfill it six times throughout the rest of the chapter by teaching how to correctly obey it or by completing our understanding of it. In Galatians 5:14, loving our neighbor fulfills the entire law, so it refers to something that countless people have done, not to something unique that only Jesus did. In Galatians 6:2, bearing one another's burdens fulfills the Law of Christ, so you should interpret that in the same way as you interpret fulfilling the Law of Moses. There is nothing about Jesus fulfilling the Mosaic Law that makes any of it no longer applicable, but rather he fulfilled it so that we would have an example to follow, and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22), and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked (1 John 2:6), which notably don't make exceptions for laws that foreshadow Christ. On the contrary, the light of Christ brings full substance to the foreshadows so that we can fully see what they were teaching us about Christ, which makes them all the more important to continue to observe in remembrance of Christ, such as in 1 Corinthian 5:6-8.

My last post quoted what I hate replied to, but it appears that you've heavily edited your post since then, which would explain why there were parts that I did not see until now that I have not replied to.
 
Upvote 0