Supreme Court Justice Alito Makes BOMBSHELL Move Paving Way To TOSS Biden's Electoral Votes In PA

chad kincham said:

They have a tremendous amount of evidence.

Just because corrupt state judges ignore the law and are blatant ideologues, that doesn’t negate the facts and evidence.

Click to expand...

So are the Federal judges who threw out cases the Trump Campaign also “blatant ideologies?” What about the ones who were Republican appointees?

Jonathan Walkerin said:

Yeah, somewhere in the multiverse it might happen.

Click to expand...

Here’s a hint of things to come:

17 STATES listed as backing Texas' lawsuit against WI, MI, PA & GA in the SUPREME COURT: MO, AL, AR, FL, NE, ND, OK, IN, KS, LA, MS, MT, SC, SD, TN, UT & WV.

UPDATE: 17 States Join Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania Over Fraudulent Election

Pavel Mosko said:

Keep the Faith my fellow Trump supporters on the board!


Supreme Court Justice Alito Makes BOMBSHELL Move Paving Way To TOSS Biden's Electoral Votes In PA. Alito amended his request for response from PA state lawyers by one day pushing the deadline back before the safe harbor deadline. This means that Joe Biden's electors could be disputed on December 8th and into the 9th by way of SCOTUS challenge and a lawsuit. Democrats had argued that the previous deadline meant that the lawsuit challenging mail in voting in Pennsylvania was moot. Now if may be exactly what Republicans and Trump need to reject the electoral college votes from PA. Republicans are counting on Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Chief Justice Roberts to give Trump a major win changing the game entirely

Click to expand...

Yet another example of the mass delusion in American Republicans. Frankly I am shocked that American Christians have bought into Trumps deception so easily He lost, I hope the Republicans keep the senate, but Biden will be president in January. How many more absolutely clear legal decisions will it take!?

Texas has a slogan: “Don’t mess with Texas.” Why does Texas think it can mess with four other states? Why doesn’t the Texas Attorney General just stay in Texas?

Archivist said:

Texas has a slogan: “Don’t mess with Texas.” Why does Texas think it can mess with four other states? Why doesn’t the Texas Attorney General just stay in Texas?

Click to expand...

It isn’t a matter of one state messing with other states; it’s about doing the right thing, the correct thing, and indeed the most appropriate thing.

Nine of Spades said:

It isn’t a matter of one state messing with other states; it’s about doing the right thing, the correct thing, and indeed the most appropriate thing.

Click to expand...

I''m happy to say that the justices on the Supreme Court don't agree that it was the right thing to do

Pavel Mosko said:

Keep the Faith my fellow Trump supporters on the board!

Click to expand...

But, the guy cheated on his wife and bragged about sexually assaulting women. Why are you supporting him?

Pavel Mosko said:

Because his policies are good for the country and he is not in China's back pocket.

Click to expand...

So, you're not denying that he cheated on his wife and that he was caught bragging about sexually assaulting women.

You're saying that you believe he's got some political edge which overrides those other problems; that he provides some kind of political benefit which necessitates turning a blind eye to these moral problems?

That ain't Christianity.

Pavel Mosko said:

Biden is not Lilly white either.

Click to expand...

It's not a competition between which political leader is the least worst. That isn't what Christianity is. No matter what head you put on the beast, you still get a beast. The point is to put Jesus first, and if you're doing that, then you won't support any leader who doesn't also put Jesus first. There's no way you can say that Trump puts Jesus first, just like there's no way you can say that Biden puts Jesus first.

Neither of them serves Jesus and therefore neither of them is worthy of your support. We're set apart. We're called. We're ambassadors of the Kingdom of Heaven; not political pawns who use a semblance of the Kingdom to justify various political agendas.

If you feel confused about this, get back to the cornerstone; the teachings of Jesus. What did he say? It may seem obvious, but read through the gospels again; make a list of what Jesus told his followers to do and not do. Use that as your guide for who is worthy of your support.

Pavel Mosko said:

Because his policies are good for the country and he is not in China's back pocket.

Click to expand...

I'd agree that many of his policies are good. However, he has proven to be simply the worst leader I've ever seen. He is a narcissist who puts himself and how he is viewed above everything else - the good of the country comes after what Trump thinks is good for him. He demands loyalty from his staff and shows none. He peddles lies about science and medicine because he thinks it will help him politically. He demonizes groups of people who won't help him politically. He insists obvious lies are the truth and somehow by personality has gotten millions to go along with him.

As Covid has shown, when crisis hits having someone as President who can lead and put the good of the country above themselves is even more important than philosophical policy. The line I got from so many friends about the election being about policy and not the person is hogwash.

That is why, when the Democrats found a way to trip all over themselves with things like the horribly named and thought out "defund the police" tag, Trump got his tail whipped in a Presidential election while the Republicans performed way above expectations in the house and senate and judicial races. His base may still be enamored with him, but the purple voters saw the truth. So he lost an election that the Democrats gave his party in every other branch of government.

Nine of Spades said:

It isn’t a matter of one state messing with other states; it’s about doing the right thing, the correct thing, and indeed the most appropriate thing.

Click to expand...

The most appropriate thing would be for Texas to mind its own business. The Court’s reaction proves that this wasn’t “the most appropriate thing.” Biden won, Trump lost. The Texas AG only did this because he is under investigation and wanted a pardon.

Archivist said:

The most appropriate thing would be for Texas to mind its own business. The Court’s reaction proves that this wasn’t “the most appropriate thing.” Biden won, Trump lost. The Texas AG only did this because he is under investigation and wanted a pardon.

Click to expand...

Texas voted majority Republican. The elected officials in that state therefore have an obligation to represent their constituency and act on their behalf.

Nine of Spades said:

Texas voted majority Republican. The elected officials in that state therefore have an obligation to represent their constituency and act on their behalf.

Click to expand...

That doesn't give them any business to sue a state that decided otherwise in free and fair elections. The AG is a self-centered jerk who is only trying to get a pardon. Acting on the behalf of your voters doesn't give you the right to take away votes from others.

Archivist said:

That doesn't give them any business to sue a state that decided otherwise in free and fair elections. The AG is a self-centered jerk who is only trying to get a pardon. Acting on the behalf of your voters doesn't give you the right to take away votes from others.

Click to expand...

I’ll go out on a limb here and say that the Republicans ought to fight dirty to ensure Trump remains president for another four years. The ends don’t always justify the means, but in this case they do. Do you really want a left-wing Democrat being our president for the next four or possibly eight years? I’m all for doing whatever it takes to prevent Biden from becoming president, even if it means compromising ethics. He would truly be bad for America.

By the way, you list yourself as a Republican, so why would you want to cavort with the other party?

Nine of Spades said:

I’ll go out on a limb here and say that the Republicans ought to fight dirty to ensure Trump remains president for another four years.

Click to expand...

that is what they have been doing.

The ends don’t always justify the means, but in this case they do. Do you really want a left-wing Democrat being our president for the next four or possibly eight years? I’m all for doing whatever it takes to prevent Biden from becoming president, even if it means compromising ethics. He would truly be bad for America.

Click to expand...

but subverting an election and engaging in what could be defined as treason is good for America?

Tribalism runs strong in these threads.

Nine of Spades said:

I’ll go out on a limb here and say that the Republicans ought to fight dirty to ensure Trump remains president for another four years. The ends don’t always justify the means, but in this case they do. Do you really want a left-wing Democrat being our president for the next four or possibly eight years? I’m all for doing whatever it takes to prevent Biden from becoming president, even if it means compromising ethics. He would truly be bad for America.

Click to expand...

The Republicans have fought dirty. They have brought numerous lawsuits, most of which they have lost. Trump has refused to concede, something that no president has done before after loosing. Republicans on the House and Senate have refused to congratulate Biden on his win.

Trump has been a horrible excuse for a President. I certainly didn’t vote for him.

By the way, you list yourself as a Republican, so why would you want to cavort with the other party?

Click to expand...

Just because I’m a Republican doesn’t mean that I voted for a worthless looser like Trump. Why would I vote for such a jerk?

I agree with you. En masse? However I would say that counting in the middle of the night with no witnesses is extremely problematic and if not, it should be illegal everywhere. That is for state legislatures to enact as election law and we as the people, no matter our political persuasion should insist on such and not the nonsense we saw this year. Whether or not everything was above board or not it certainly does not have the appearance of being the case and that, although perhaps only perception, is still a huge problem now and into the future. Our state legislatures need to fix this immediately and in a manner that it cannot be modified by any appointed official or even the courts. They can enact legislation in a manner to prevent both.

Nine of Spades said:

It isn’t a matter of one state messing with other states; it’s about doing the right thing, the correct thing, and indeed the most appropriate thing.

Click to expand...

And the right thing, the correct thing and the most appropriate thing is to accept the votes as counted. There have been court cases; none has found any significant voter fraud that could have changed the election.