- Apr 25, 2016
- 34,219
- 19,067
- 44
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
I'm on the fence on this one.
On the one hand... the works stand on their own. Are they good and useful? Then why lose that benefit by tossing them?
On the other hand... having those books can seem to be an endorsement of the author. (Note: I'm the sort of person whose theological bookshelf is regularly browsed by others, and those who look to me for guidance. This may hold less weight if nobody else ever sees your bookshelf).
And depending what he did (on which I am not clear) that might be a step too far for me.
For example, if my most favourite Christian author was tomorrow discovered to be sexually abusing kids... all those books come off my shelves. No question. I'm not prepared to be seen as supporting or excusing paedophilia, even by implication.
But if the offence is of a less serious degree, then the question to me becomes, do I think it so fundamentally compromises his witness, or is it more of a "meh, everyone's human" kind of issue? After all, none of us can claim to be perfect!
I've never really had to ask myself exactly where the line is on that one, for myself. But I think that's where the nub of the issue would be, for me.
On the one hand... the works stand on their own. Are they good and useful? Then why lose that benefit by tossing them?
On the other hand... having those books can seem to be an endorsement of the author. (Note: I'm the sort of person whose theological bookshelf is regularly browsed by others, and those who look to me for guidance. This may hold less weight if nobody else ever sees your bookshelf).
And depending what he did (on which I am not clear) that might be a step too far for me.
For example, if my most favourite Christian author was tomorrow discovered to be sexually abusing kids... all those books come off my shelves. No question. I'm not prepared to be seen as supporting or excusing paedophilia, even by implication.
But if the offence is of a less serious degree, then the question to me becomes, do I think it so fundamentally compromises his witness, or is it more of a "meh, everyone's human" kind of issue? After all, none of us can claim to be perfect!
I've never really had to ask myself exactly where the line is on that one, for myself. But I think that's where the nub of the issue would be, for me.
Upvote
0