Is the FBI Finally Looking Into Voter Fraud?

NotreDame said:

Have you seen the plethora of other threads? Welcome to Newsmax or One American News, Christianforums style.

Click to expand...

8 out of the top 10 threads at the time of writing are the op poster's conspiracy threads. It's getting quite ridiculous.

Kentonio said:

8 out of the top 10 threads at the time of writing are the op poster's conspiracy threads. It's getting quite ridiculous.

Click to expand...

Yup.

And again, there is a perfectly serviceable conspiracy forum to sandbox this crap that really should be availed of more often.

Kentonio said:

8 out of the top 10 threads at the time of writing are the op poster's conspiracy threads. It's getting quite ridiculous.

Click to expand...

Well, you know what they say, tell the truth often enough and pretty soon even the liberal commie socialists who are trying to overthrow the government will believe it.

Blade said:

Thank you Father for always seeing your righteous and thank you for always being faithful to what Jesus Christ has already done.

Click to expand...

Amen!

Hans Blaster said:

I already debunked this once today. Here's the short version:

Counting never stopped in Wisconsin. It was finished within 12 hours of poll closing. In the other states counting took several days and every county sent the counters home each night rather than having enough staff to work 24-hours a day.

This is NOTHING.

Click to expand...

So help me understand how in high population states like Florida you had the report after a few brief hours. Texas as well...other places too. Not trying to be argumentative with you but these are a lot of questions people have.

Bobber said:

So help me understand how in high population states like Florida you had the report after a few brief hours. Texas as well...other places too. Not trying to be argumentative with you but these are a lot of questions people have.

Click to expand...

What you had was poll data and enough votes to call the state after a short time. Some, like Kentucky or New York, were called 30 seconds after the polls shut with 0% of the vote counted. Others were called when there was a clear statistical winner. All states took at least a few days to complete the full count. Thos states republicans won or Clinton won in 2016 were considered expected by Trump so he didn't raise a fuss in them. The marginal states were marginal so alot more of the vote had to be counted before a call could be made.

Also some states, like Ohio, allowed the mail in votes to be counted before election day. Since mail in ballots are alot slower than in person votes to tabulate, this meant those states got the slow stuff out of the way and were able to reach a conclusion quicker.

Muh Russia! done tuckered the FBI out! They’ve simply been resting all this time.

Tom 1 said:

As you can easily see from the data released by the White House, the only actual real fraud data, there is always some election fraud, whether intentional or not, in every election, ever, and, unless we are all turned into unthinking automatons there always will be, just as there will always be car accidents, and fights, and whatever else you can think of. What there is no evidence for at all is the kind of widespread fraud Trumpus and his minions are claiming.

Click to expand...

It's like pointing to some drizzle and saying "Now that you agree there's a hurricane, we're just arguing about the severity of the storm."

Yes, there is some level of fraud in every election, just as there is rain in every hurricane, but nothing we've seen to date suggests widespread/coordinated fraud which Trump and Giuliani talk about (and never present in court).

Kind of funny, since we had over 100 pages detailing Trump's obstruction of justice in the Mueller Report, and at that point the standard was "but Trump wasn't convicted of anything". For fraud it seems to be "we have claims, so we know there's a huge problem".

whatbogsends said:

Yes, there is some level of fraud in every election, just as there is rain in every hurricane

Click to expand...

Ah, yes. that's Stage Three of denial.

but nothing we've seen to date suggests widespread/coordinated fraud which Trump and Giuliani talk about....

Click to expand...

check. Right on schedule.

Kind of funny, since we had over 100 pages detailing Trump's obstruction of justice in the Mueller Report, and at that point the standard was "but Trump wasn't convicted of anything".

Click to expand...

A lot was written about Piltdown Man, too. That didn't make him real.

"C'mon Man," if 100 pages of the Mueller Report had any credibility, Adam Schiff and Co. wouldn't have had to hurry-up and Impeach the President for general causes and "we don't like him." LOL

Albion said:

Ah, yes. that's Stage Three of denial.


check. Right on schedule.



A lot was written about Piltdown Man, too. That didn't make him real.

"C'mon Man," if 100 pages of the Mueller Report had any credibility, Adam Schiff and Co. wouldn't have had to hurry-up and Impeach the President for general causes and "we don't like him." LOL

Click to expand...

You really think Donald is going to turn this around?

Albion said:

Ah, yes. that's Stage Three of denial.

check. Right on schedule.

A lot was written about Piltdown Man, too. That didn't make him real.

"C'mon Man," if 100 pages of the Mueller Report had any credibility, Adam Schiff and Co. wouldn't have had to hurry-up and Impeach the President for general causes and "we don't like him." LOL

Click to expand...

No, stage 3 of denial is losing an election by the same electoral college count that you had previously called "a landslide" when you won and still insisting that you won.

A lot was written about Piltdown Man, too.

Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean by 'a lot', but it was scarcely represented in the scientific literature. It got some play in the news, but that was about it.

lasthero said:

Not sure what you mean by 'a lot', but it was scarcely represented in the scientific literature. It got some play in the news, but that was about it.

Click to expand...

You recognized the reference when you read the post, didn't you?

NightHawkeye said:

From the "Voter Integrity Project", files: Is the FBI Finally Looking Into Voter Fraud?

Matt Braynard, a former data chief and strategist for the Trump campaign, and his team at The Voter Integrity Project have conducted a review of ballot and election results in the 2020 election. Braynard went through his team's work in a recent video, revealing the troubling findings his team uncovered in the course of their research.

Braynard now says the FBI has reached out to him and his team asking for them to hand over evidence underlying their findings.​

Click to expand...

I suspect the FBI/CIA are looking into or actively building an espionage case against the Trump campaign adding to the existing pile of miss deeds by this administration. So I would not see this a a win for Mr. Trump. For further reading look up The Espionage Act of 1917.

Maria Billingsley said:

I suspect the FBI/CIA are looking into or actively building an espionage case against the Trump campaign....

Click to expand...

Now THAT'S the FBI we all know and love. Truly an arm of the Swamp.

Albion said:

You recognized the reference when you read the post, didn't you?

Click to expand...

Albion said:

You recognized the reference when you read the post, didn't you?

Click to expand...

Yes. I’m fairly familiar with Piltdown Man.

lasthero said:

Yes. I’m fairly familiar with Piltdown Man.

Click to expand...

So, more than 100 years after the event, ordinary people like you and I know what "Piltdown Man" was about. That's aside from whether or not the claim was genuine.

It is not the case, therefore, that "It got some play in the news, but that was about it."

Albion said:

So, more than 100 years after the event, ordinary people like you and I know what "Piltdown Man" was about. That's aside from whether or not the claim was genuine.

It is not the case, therefore, that "It got some play in the news, but that was about it."

Click to expand...

When you wrote that I assumed you meant at the time it wasn’t known to be a hoax, around the time it was first discovered and studied. Otherwise, you’re statement doesn’t make a whole lot of sense as a comparison - of course it’s been written about a lot in the near century since it was found to be a hoax.

NightHawkeye said:

So you agree that Trump is entitled to his day in court.

Click to expand...

Donald Trump has not been denied due process. He’s had many days in various courts, including the federal court for the middle district of PA, and the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. He’s filed over 2 dozen suits claiming election fraud massive enough to reverse the results. The burden of proof in these cases is totally on him. And every one has been dismissed for lack of evidence.

Why is it so hard to believe that Donald Trump lost an election? I can understand that given his gargantuan ego, he has to fabricate an excuse for his defeat. But you’re an intelligent guy. Can’t you see that Donald Trump is playing you for a fool? He’s dragging you and his other supporters into his dark, conspiracy-laden fantasy world. He’s keeping you guys angry and distrustful. Which is unhealthy for you and for the country. Don’t let him do it. You deserve better than that.

NightHawkeye said:

Fortunately, almost everyone knows that fraud was rampant in the 2020 election. A CNBC poll a week or so back revealed that only 3% of Trump voters thought Biden won the election. A larger percentage of Biden voters claim that Biden won, but even many of them also know about the fraud.

Click to expand...

The only fraud I see. Is Trump trying to cause mail vote fraud, trying to get his supporters to vote twice. Hiring people, that he thinks will allow him to cheat. And now Trump is still trying to cheat.