Evidence of Election Fraud

Status
Not open for further replies.

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Disparaging and belittling vast swaths of Americans aside, (which borders on goading), let me ask. In your mind, should widespread, strange and peculiar election irregularities be investigated? Or, are you satisfied that since your man came out on top as a result, there's no need for anything further?

If widespread irregularities existed, they should be investigated.

As they don't, I see no reason to waste taxpayer dollars on Donald's Snipe Hunt.

Donald's campaign is, of course, free to spend as much of its own money to investigate whatever it wishes... They just spent $3 million on a recount in Wisconsin... which uncovered a net change of 130 votes...

...for Biden.
 
Upvote 0

trunks2k

Contributor
Jan 26, 2004
11,369
3,520
41
✟270,241.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The one with the actual evidence which showed that Gore actually won Florida, and thus the election, had SCOTUS not voted 5-4 along party lines to stop the count?
Point of clarity here - the general ruling to stop the county-only recount was actually a 7-2 decision. The REMEDY for that (declaring the whole state needed to recount vs it being too late to perform a state-wide recount so the state should just certify its results and be done with it) was a 5-4 decision.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TLK Valentine
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,526
Tarnaveni
✟818,769.00
Country
Romania
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Here we are amongst election fraud litigation and in come diesel shredder trucks.

You might be onto something there. Here’s a picture of a monkey:

E2E7846C-1BE1-4256-BD8F-0943E954123C.jpeg


Democrats have been unable to prove that this monkey didn’t vote at least twice in the recent election, ergo there is massive election fraud. Added to this compelling evidence, Steven McDonnelly, a person who saw some votes, says he saw some vote type things that ‘weren’t right’. He is certain that ‘something bad is going on’. Clearly, this is more undeniable evidence of massive, huge, enormous, stupendously gigantic and widespread fraud. The end.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Point of clarity here - the general ruling to stop the county-only recount was actually a 7-2 decision. The REMEDY for that (declaring the whole state needed to recount vs it being too late to perform a state-wide recount so the state should just certify its results and be done with it) was a 5-4 decision.

Fair enough.
 
Upvote 0

LostMarbels

All-Lives-Matter
Jun 18, 2011
11,954
3,864
48
Orlando Fl
✟173,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You might be onto something there. Here’s a picture of a monkey:

You are not thinking about what I am saying. The democrats antics are doing nothing to quell this dispute. It is not exactly wise to have shredder trucks pulling up to the electoral board while under the suspicion of electoral fraud. Not very smart.
 
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,526
Tarnaveni
✟818,769.00
Country
Romania
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are not thinking about what I am saying. The democrats antics are doing nothing to quell this dispute. It is not exactly wise to have shredder trucks pulling up to the electoral board while under the suspicion of electoral fraud. Not very smart.

Free association has been fairly well debunked as a means of arriving at anything useful, as far as I know.

‘Democrats’ are not under suspicion of election fraud. Some die hard Trumpers and others who don’t want to lose Trumpfan votes are putting on a big old tarring and feathering spectacular with some smoke and mirrors thrown in. No evidence is needed, as the tactic of just repeating nonsense in a loud voice is remarkably effective.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
You know... you're right. I think that is the best possible stance for you to be in at this moment. This should all just be swept under the rug and ignored.

What should be swept under the rug and ignored?
 
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,526
Tarnaveni
✟818,769.00
Country
Romania
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You know... you're right. I think that is the best possible stance for you to be in at this moment. This should all just be swept under the rug and ignored.

If there was anything at all legit those accusing could take their solid evidence to one of the Trump appointed conservative judges they’ve been trying to sell their evidence free nonsense to, and proceed with a legitimate legal case. They do not have anything approaching solid evidence, however, hence all of the non-legally relevant public hearings and proclamations endlessly trumpeting things that vaguely sound like something that might mean something if any of it were true, but which is in fact only useful for covering over the utter lack of any evidence at all of any kind of fraud.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,129.00
Faith
Atheist
It was all a conspiracy theory ... just refer to the two year and millions of dollars Mueller investigation, which all tax payers paid for. Was that an attempt to subvert a Constitutionally elected President? How about Gore's attempt in 2000?

Please stop with the double standards.


The Mueller investigation (started by Republicans) was predicated on reasonable suspicion, and led to numerous indictments. Further, there is no serious contention of the primary finding of the Mueller investigation - Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

The Bush vs. Gore election boiled down to 500 votes in 1 state. Gore wasn't going around saying "massive fraud" and "i really won" - the results of Florida were challenged and it was a legitimate challenge.

Trump and his sycophants are trying to overturn conclusive election results based on allegations without proof.

Please stop with the false equivalencies.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
2) Conflating 'Russian collusion' with 'Russian interference' is a classic deceptive diversion tactic used by the left. Not saying you're doing it. But the fact remains that the initial and MAIN charge was that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, which was an unfounded and false allegation.
No, it was actually a spin put on by the Right to conflate Russian conclusion with Russian interference, which at the time the Right was trying to deny. By misrepresenting the Mueller investigation as a ploy to "get Trump" their findings of Russian interference could be discredited. This is all well documented, including the Justice Department's orders to Mueller, which listed Russian interference with the election as his first target and possible involvement of campaign workers as a second. Trump wasn't mentioned at all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

Yttrium

Independent Centrist
May 19, 2019
3,854
4,268
Pacific NW
✟242,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
The whole topic. There is no evidence, you have won. So don't worry about it. All our sycophantic ramblings do not matter in the least. I agree that is the best course of action. Just ignore us and let us be.

Cheer up, LM. Today Trump reversed course after previously stating that he'd accept the will of the electors. Now, like you, he's saying that Biden needs to prove his votes weren't fraudulent. As if he could mandate something like that, and he can't.

Trump claims Biden must prove votes weren't 'illegally obtained' in order to enter White House | Fox News
 
Upvote 0

LostMarbels

All-Lives-Matter
Jun 18, 2011
11,954
3,864
48
Orlando Fl
✟173,798.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Cheer up, LM. Today Trump reversed course after previously stating that he'd accept the will of the electors. Now, like you, he's saying that Biden needs to prove his votes weren't fraudulent. As if he could mandate something like that, and he can't.

Trump claims Biden must prove votes weren't 'illegally obtained' in order to enter White House | Fox News

That wasn't defeatism... that was me driving the point if you are so sure you won, go take a nap. And I think it is the best attitude for democrats to have. It's all over, you won... nothing to worry about.
 
Upvote 0

Yttrium

Independent Centrist
May 19, 2019
3,854
4,268
Pacific NW
✟242,497.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
That wasn't defeatism... that was me driving the point if you are so sure you won, go take a nap. And I think it is the best attitude for democrats to have. It's all over, you won... nothing to worry about.

Oh. Well, I'm not a Democrat, and I have a lot to worry about.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,129.00
Faith
Atheist
Cheer up, LM. Today Trump reversed course after previously stating that he'd accept the will of the electors. Now, like you, he's saying that Biden needs to prove his votes weren't fraudulent. As if he could mandate something like that, and he can't.

Trump claims Biden must prove votes weren't 'illegally obtained' in order to enter White House | Fox News

I'm wholly unsurprised by this reversal. Any time Trump says something that remotely comports with legal process, he reverses that stance within a day.
 
Upvote 0

MIDutch

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2020
2,421
3,383
67
Detroit
✟75,674.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
You know... you're right. I think that is the best possible stance for you to be in at this moment. This should all just be swept under the rug and ignored.
What about all of the voter fraud in Texas?

Are you going to sweep that under the rug and ignore it?

https://images.indianexpress.com/2020/10/texas-voting.jpg

Look at all those people wearing masks. They must be liberals. And almost no one who isn't wearing a mask (which would be the conservatives). From this picture it's pretty clear that there were LOTS more Democrats voting in Texas than Republicans and yet trump won Texas. This PROVES that there was voter fraud in Texas that gave trump the win.

Why aren't you complaining about the voter fraud that stole Texas from Biden?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.