Here's the Part of Sidney Powell’s Lawsuit That Could Impact the Outcome of the Election

NightHawkeye · Nov 27, 2020

DaisyDay said:
Yeah, right...."DISTRICCT COURT" & "DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA" yeah, totally the result of reformatting a pdf...

It's more than a little revealing when one focuses on meaningless distractions rather than the main points being made.

On that subject, how many "gaffes" has Biden made today? Or, is it still a stuttering problem?

Speedwell · Nov 27, 2020

NightHawkeye said:
Incorrect.

The movement backing Trump existed long before Trump came along.

Which doesn't change anything. No doubt they will be looking for another Fearless Leader after Trump is gone.

DaisyDay · Nov 27, 2020

NightHawkeye said:
It's more than a little revealing when one focuses on meaningless distractions rather than the main points being made.

Hey, I was addressing the content of your post, your choice of subject. ^_^

That point was the entirety of your post.

On that subject, how many "gaffes" has Biden made today? Or, is it still a stuttering problem?

So we're no longer on "that" subject, now we're on to "What about something else entirely!!!" ^_^

NightHawkeye · Nov 27, 2020

DaisyDay said:
So we're no longer on "that" subject, now we're on to "What about something else entirely!!!"

Not sure why this is hard for you or anyone to follow, DaisyDay.

Now, back to the subject matter, if you please. (Thanks in advance for staying on topic, not trivialities.)

Hans Blaster · Nov 27, 2020

NightHawkeye said:
The movement backing Trump existed long before Trump came along.

And what exactly was that movement before Trump?

SilverBear · Nov 27, 2020

NightHawkeye said:
On that subject, how many "gaffes" has Biden made today? Or, is it still a stuttering problem?

It's rather telling that you would rather focus on something meaningless than the points being made

Bobber · Nov 27, 2020

Speedwell said:
Which doesn't change anything. No doubt they will be looking for another Fearless Leader after Trump is gone.

Why not? Why should they want a few coastal cites controlling the whole country?

Gene2memE · Nov 27, 2020

Bobber said:
Why not? Why should they want a few coastal cites controlling the whole country?

Because that's where the people are?

Bobber · Nov 27, 2020

Gene2memE said:
Because that's where the people are?

That's not where ALL people are.

GreatLakes4Ever · Nov 27, 2020

Bobber said:
Why not? Why should they want a few coastal cites controlling the whole country?

If that was your fear, picking Trump as your leader is liking picking Cookie Monster to protect your cookies.

Hans Blaster · Nov 27, 2020

Bobber said:
Why not? Why should they want a few coastal cites controlling the whole country?

What makes you think a few coastal cities control the whole country? Show your work.

lasthero · Nov 28, 2020

Bobber said:
Why not? Why should they want a few coastal cites controlling the whole country?

How’s that worse than a handful of swing states controlling the whole country?

Bobber · Nov 28, 2020

lasthero said:
How’s that worse than a handful of swing states controlling the whole country?

Smaller states get lower points in the EC.

lasthero · Nov 28, 2020

Bobber said:
Smaller states get lower points in the EC.

True, but the size of the States doesn't matter if they're pretty much guaranteed to go one candidate or another. For instance, California is pretty much a guaranteed Democrat win, so there's little reason for a Republican candidate to spend much time or effort swinging votes there.

Instead, they focus on the handful of States that are 'in play', the ones that might go one way or another. There's not much reason for them to care about the needs of States that are solid red or blue.

Gene2memE · Nov 28, 2020

Bobber said:
That's not where ALL people are.

And, your point being?

People in less populated states have votes that are worth more per capita, based on the EC.

Why should someone's vote in Wyoming be more than three time as valuable as someone's vote in Florida?

Tom 1 · Nov 28, 2020

NightHawkeye said:
From the "Let's analyze the evidence", files: Here's the Part of Sidney Powell’s Lawsuit That Could Impact the Outcome of the Election

Trump legal adviser Harmeet Dhillon looked at Powell’s legal challenge and went on a lengthy Twitter thread zeroing in on some of the most serious allegations.
...
“These are serious allegations, and maybe the evidence (some of it filed and some of it under seal provisionally) will persuade. Either of these big themes would be enough to change the election results given the narrow margin for Biden,” wrote Dhillon.

“To me, the easiest way to reach that goal is something much simpler alleged in the complaint at paragraph 121: That thousands of specific, identifiable voters, cast ballots after they moved out of state as evidenced in their registration in a national database, and may even have cast votes in their new states also which can easily be checked against the other state’s records,” she added.
...
“These seem to be specific and of a sufficient volume that their disqualification would affect the outcome of the election,” Dhillon said.

Very much like a used car seller’s pitch, hours of jabber about how amazing this 1974 Buick is, contrary to all appearances it it a total bargain. Then you turn the key in the ignition, and nothing happens. But, if you’ve already bought it, you’ll find a way to persuade yourself it was a real bargain.

Kentonio · Nov 28, 2020

Bobber said:
That's not where ALL people are.

You seem to be struggling a little with the concept of democracy..

GreatLakes4Ever · Nov 28, 2020

lasthero said:
True, but the size of the States doesn't matter if they're pretty much guaranteed to go one candidate or another. For instance, California is pretty much a guaranteed Democrat win, so there's little reason for a Republican candidate to spend much time or effort swinging votes there.

Instead, they focus on the handful of States that are 'in play', the ones that might go one way or another. There's not much reason for them to care about the needs of States that are solid red or blue.

The problem of a few swing states having all of the value is demonstrated by where the 2016 candidates spent their time. You can always raise more money but time is a very finite resource. 94% of 2016 Presidential Campaign Was in Just 12 Closely Divided States

Bobber · Nov 28, 2020

Gene2memE said:
And, your point being?

People in less populated states have votes that are worth more per capita, based on the EC.

Why should someone's vote in Wyoming be more than three time as valuable as someone's vote in Florida?

But it is balanced out in a pretty fair way. Wyoming only gets 3 points in the EC and Florida gets 29.

DaisyDay · Nov 28, 2020

NightHawkeye said:
Not sure why this is hard for you or anyone to follow, DaisyDay.

Now, back to the subject matter, if you please. (Thanks in advance for staying on topic, not trivialities.)

It’s not hard to follow at all as we’ve seen you pull this tired trick whenever you have been called out. Deny, deflect and distract.

Here's the Part of Sidney Powell’s Lawsuit That Could Impact the Outcome of the Election

Work-in-progress

Well-Known Member

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State

Work-in-progress

Rocket surgeon

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Rocket surgeon

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Newbie

Optimistic sceptic

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State

Similar threads