Here's the Part of Sidney Powell’s Lawsuit That Could Impact the Outcome of the Election

I'm sorry, I don't understand why that would change the election results. First, as we saw in the lawsuit filed in Nevada, a lot of the names on that list were military families -- while they may "live" (are stationed) in another state, they still legally maintain their Georgia residency. The other issue is that many may not live out of state, rather they have names similar to people who live in another state -- something also found that these types of list are often prone to.

Beyond that, how do you show who these people voted for? What makes them more likely to be Biden than Trump voters? You can't just pull out those votes, at this point -- they were accepted as legal, had any identifying information stripped (to make the ballot secret), and at this point can't be separated from other votes cast.

Last, as I show above, this list is not evidence. Again, there are likely military members and their family -- who though living elsewhere maintain their Georgia residence -- and those with names similar to people living in another state which are mismatched. For the court to take this list seriously, Ms. Powell would need to have a list that has been vetted -- for example, this person moved on "X" date and voted in another state -- with the actual evidence for every person on the list. This idea that a list of names of people that allegedly have legal residence elsewhere, and so may have voted illegally, is not evidence, it is supposition that courts do not allow.

NightHawkeye said:

From the "Let's analyze the evidence", files: Here's the Part of Sidney Powell’s Lawsuit That Could Impact the Outcome of the Election

Trump legal adviser Harmeet Dhillon looked at Powell’s legal challenge and went on a lengthy Twitter thread zeroing in on some of the most serious allegations.
...
“These are serious allegations, and maybe the evidence (some of it filed and some of it under seal provisionally) will persuade. Either of these big themes would be enough to change the election results given the narrow margin for Biden,” wrote Dhillon.

“To me, the easiest way to reach that goal is something much simpler alleged in the complaint at paragraph 121: That thousands of specific, identifiable voters, cast ballots after they moved out of state as evidenced in their registration in a national database, and may even have cast votes in their new states also which can easily be checked against the other state’s records,” she added.
...
“These seem to be specific and of a sufficient volume that their disqualification would affect the outcome of the election,” Dhillon said.​

Click to expand...

I have no clue what this person is talking about. This is what paragraph 121 says:

121.
While the bedrock of American elections has been transparency, almost
every crucial aspect of Georgia’s November 3, 2020, General Election was shrouded in secrecy, rife with “errors,” and permeated with anomalies so egregious as to render the results incapable of certification.
MULTIPLE EXPERT REPORTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES PROVE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF VOTES WERE LOST OR SHIFTED THAT COST PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 6 AND 7 THEIR RACES.

Click to expand...

https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp...1/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf

I see nothing about numbers of out of state people voting on this paragraph.

I don't understand Poowell's argument

Perhaps she could

Spell it out for us

LostMarbels said:

View attachment 289569

Click to expand...

One sure fire way to do that would be to, you know, proofread and use spellcheck. Then people wouldn’t be focused on the glaring incompetence and they could get right to the unevidenced claims and bogus allegations. But then we have some claiming the simple typos are actually all part of the plan so maybe Mr McCullough is just clueless to what Team Kraken is doing.

The way I see it... the left's argument has continued to devolve into the new low point of: 'Well, maybe if we pick on them....'

LostMarbels said:

The way I see it... the left's argument has continued to devolve into the new low point of: 'Well, maybe if we pick on them....'

Click to expand...

No, it's "Maybe if we laugh at them we'll get some amusement out of this sorry mess." The lawsuits themselves can be rejected for their lack of substantive merit regardless of typos.

LostMarbels said:

The way I see it... the left's argument has continued to devolve into the new low point of: 'Well, maybe if we pick on them....'

Click to expand...

Why bother putting together a real argument against bogus allegations? The day they come up with something substantive is when you’ll start to hear substantive arguments against it. Until then, just enjoy the clown show like I’ve been for the past 3 weeks.

LostMarbels said:

View attachment 289569

Click to expand...

That isn't a change of narrative. They can have no evidence and still be trash at filing a brief.

The problem here is we gave them too much credit in assuming they wouldn't be *this* incompetent

Triumvirate said:

That isn't a change of narrative. They can have no evidence and still be trash at filing a brief.

The problem here is we gave them too much credit in assuming they wouldn't be *this* incompetent

Click to expand...

It is too late to be scared. You are still trying to shame people that are already determined to continue. If all you have is social stigma and widespread media shaming, you will lose.

LostMarbels said:

It is too late to be scared. You are still trying to shame people that are already determined to continue. If all you have is social stigma and widespread media shaming, you will lose.

Click to expand...

Having the truth that the Right has failed to produce evidence of this election being stolen in a court of law is all the proof that is needed to prove Biden won this election. Trump lost and unless you are willing to overthrow the United States government, he won’t be the leader of this country come January 20th.

LostMarbels said:

It is too late to be scared. You are still trying to shame people that are already determined to continue. If all you have is social stigma and widespread media shaming, you will lose.

Click to expand...

We have the courts. That's all that matters. Any shame you feel is your own.

NightHawkeye said:

From the "Let's analyze the evidence", files: Here's the Part of Sidney Powell’s Lawsuit That Could Impact the Outcome of the Election

Trump legal adviser Harmeet Dhillon looked at Powell’s legal challenge and went on a lengthy Twitter thread zeroing in on some of the most serious allegations.
...
“These are serious allegations, and maybe the evidence (some of it filed and some of it under seal provisionally) will persuade. Either of these big themes would be enough to change the election results given the narrow margin for Biden,” wrote Dhillon.

“To me, the easiest way to reach that goal is something much simpler alleged in the complaint at paragraph 121: That thousands of specific, identifiable voters, cast ballots after they moved out of state as evidenced in their registration in a national database, and may even have cast votes in their new states also which can easily be checked against the other state’s records,” she added.


​

Click to expand...

No they cast their ballots before they left. Most states accept most states have a 30 day acceptance period of residency do any mail in ballot sent 30 days before the election would be considered valid in the state the person resided in. At the same time most states have a 30 day registration requirement before an individual in a new state can vote.

So Dhillon's point is...pointless. If i moved from my home state on November 1 and the last thing i did when leaving was put my ballot in the mail then it would be counted where i lived as i was a resident there. There is no way i could vote again in my new state as even if the first thing i did when arriving was go to register to vote i still would not be eligible to vote became of the 30 registration requirement i would not yet be a registered voter in my new state.

GreatLakes4Ever said:

Having the truth that the Right has failed to produce evidence of this election being stolen in a court of law is all the proof that is needed to prove Biden won this election. Trump lost and unless you are willing to overthrow the United States government, he won’t be the leader of this country come January 20th.

Click to expand...

You shouldn't be offering such a tempting alternative. They want Trump more than they want a constitutional republic.

Speedwell said:

You shouldn't be offering such a tempting alternative. They want Trump more than they want a constitutional republic.

Click to expand...

Yeah, I know they’d light the Constitution on fire if they thought it would improve the chances that Trump could be their leader.

NightHawkeye said:

Calling them "typos" as the press has done is a bit disingenuous.

Mostly, the so-called "typos" are collections of perfectly spelled phrases and sentences without spaces in between the words. I'm guessing that something errant happened when the PDF files were created and that the legal team didn't have the computer savvy to unravel it in time to complete the filing on Wednesday evening, so they opted to file "typos" and all.

Just my guess though ...

Click to expand...

Yeah, right...."DISTRICCT COURT" & "DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA" yeah, totally the result of reformatting a pdf...