If we knew what you meant we wouldn't still be having this discussion.
Do you need to explain more? No, note more; you have to explain with clarity and without ambiguity, something you have failed to do so thus far. Earlier you said this:
I imagine you hoped that would read as "It's English language, you should get it."
That's three errors in one sentence. I suggest you consider that your command of the language is not as good as you think it is. Perhaps if you used one of those computer programs you denigrate it could help you avoid such simple mistakes.
However, the serious error is that you are not writing with clarity. Your emotion and frustration are outpacing your ability to deliver your message. Since that message seems important to you why not calm down and listen to what others are saying. . . . . . No, rest assured, you are not listening. That is evident in your replies.
Note: I found it interesting that the "better" features you favoured were "authority, power and intelligence", rather than the "compassion, empathy, artisitic creativity and the like" I proposed. I fear that tells me all I need to know about you.
