Just a quick point here regarding my suggestions. Not all Amills are the same, just as not all Premills are the same. Those who are of a Preterist kind would disagree with me. Idealists amills might disagree; I’m not sure about them. But my version of Amillennialism is the same as that of Kim Riddlebarger. He speaks quite clearly in his blog that he expects a major revival in the present Jewish nation after the ‘times of the Gentiles’, late in the '1000' years, and immediately before Jesus' coming. I hold to the same view.
I think it is explicit enough in Romans and other scriptures.
Here is his blog sermon article about it. Click the link to his full pdf article.
Thank you for that link.
Well, I have kept the same view in mind about Israel's repentance, but without allowing myself to become convinced of something that has not yet materialized.
My views are based on a number of things:-
1.
Joseph:
* He was sold into slavery in Egypt (they may as well have handed over to death because they did not know what would become of him) for 20 pieces of silver at the instigation of Judah, who was a scoundrel right up until his repentance. Judas betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.
* The Israelites took his robe dipped in blood as evidence to their father that he was dead (though in their case, it was a lie).
.. etc (there are a number of ways in which Joseph is not only a type of Jesus, but actually a prophetic picture).
* Joseph did not reveal to his brothers who he was until Judah showed repentance and remorse for what he had done.
* He could have had all his brothers except Benjamin put to death for what they had done to him, without even allowing them into his presence, and they would have been none the wiser - from their perspective, a very powerful Egyptian ruler, second only to Pharaoh in power and status, had sent them to the dungeon awaiting execution, ancient Egyptian style - but he did not, he forgave them - then "all Israel" was reconciled to him, and he brought them to live with him in the idyllic land of Goshen during a prolonged period of peace, safety and prosperity which only ended when another Pharaoh arose who had no regard for Joseph or Israel.
2.
The house of Israel and the House of Judah (the New Covenant is promised to both the house of Israel and the house of Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-33)
* Jacob told Joseph that the seed of his son, Ephraim, would become "the fullness of the Gentiles" (multitude of nations in the English Bibles).
* The Northern Kingdom became collectively known as "Ephraim" in prophecy.
* Though a small handful of the Northern tribes escaped to Judah when Assyria invaded Israel, & this handful became amalgamated with the house of Judah, the vast majority were exiled, scattered among the nations, and their seed intermarried with Gentiles, to the point where the original ten tribes are untraceable today.
* Ezekiel's prophecy regarding the two sticks of Israel and Judah becoming one in the hand of Joseph, compared with Paul's statement regarding there being neither Jew nor Gentile in Christ.
* The last part is long, as it is an explanation of the above:-
Romans 9:25-26
"As He also says in Hosea, "I will call those not My people, My people; and those not beloved, Beloved."
And it shall be, in the place where it was said to them. "You are not My people; there they shall be called sons of the living God."
In its Old Testament context, the prophecy is talking about "Ephraim" or the house of Israel, but Paul is now applying the prophecy to the Gentiles who believe in Jesus.
The entire prophecy, in its context, speaks about God's judgment (at the time the prophecy was given) regarding both the house of Israel and the house of Judah:
Hosea 1:6-11
"And she conceived again and bore a daughter. And God said to him, Call her name No-mercy,
for I will no more have mercy on the house of Israel. But I will utterly take them away.
But I will have mercy on the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen.
And when she had weaned Lo-ruhamah, she conceived and bore a son.
And He said,
Call his name Not-my-people. For you are not My people, and I will not be for you.
Yet the number of the sons of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered. And it shall be, in the place where it was said to them, You are not My people, there it shall be said to them, You are the sons of the living God."
The prophecy closes with,
"Then
the sons of Judah and the sons of Israel shall be gathered together, and shall set over themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land. For great shall be the day of Jezreel."
So at the time Hosea uttered the prophecy, God said
He would no more have mercy upon the house of Israel, but He would have mercy on the house of Judah.
Then comes Paul's statement in Romans 11,
regarding God's mercy:
Romans 11:30-32
"For as you also
then disbelieved God, but now have been shown mercy through their disbelief,
even so these also have not believed now,
so that through your mercy they may also obtain mercy. For God has shut up all in unbelief, so that He might show mercy to all."
In the days of Hosea, God no more had mercy on Ephraim (the house of Israel), but He had mercy on the house of Judah. At the time of Christ's crucifixion, it was switched around:
Matthew 23:39
"For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."
I'm not saying that those Gentiles who believe in Christ are genetic descendants of the Northern Israelite tribes (clearly this is not the case). However, the vast majority of the house of Israel (Ephraim) was exiled, scattered among the nations, and their seed intermarried with Gentiles to the point where the original ten tribes are untraceable today.
So to me, this means that "the Olive tree" in Romans 11 still consists of those to whom the New Covenant was promised - "The house of Israel and the house of Judah" (Jer 31:31), and Gentiles who believe in Jesus are grafted into the olive tree
among the remnant of the house of Judah who believe, but we are
considered the house of Israel.
Hence, my handle and my signature.
I still don't believe this "theology" which I expressed here, because it's not a materialized reality, and obviously too many Christians have major issues with it - but It's something I bear in mind.