Seek holiness not experiences.
The notion that 80 praying Russians can somehow pray Jesus into action against an atheist is nothing short of superstition. John 3:8 explicitly teaches that we have no control over the Holy Ghost. He goes were Jesus wills, saving the elect. The Holy Ghost isn't a performance artist, causing people to act like fools, speak in gibberish etc.Any evidence to support these accusations?
The notion that 80 praying Russians can somehow pray Jesus into action against an atheist is nothing short of superstition. John 3:8 explicitly teaches that we have no control over the Holy Ghost. He goes were Jesus wills, saving the elect. The Holy Ghost isn't a performance artist, causing people to act like fools, speak in gibberish etc.
The notion that 80 praying Russians can somehow pray Jesus into action against an atheist is nothing short of superstition.
John 3:8 explicitly teaches that we have no control over the Holy Ghost.
Sorry, in which video from the OP is someone acting like a fool? I'm not sure which video you are specifically talking about.The Holy Ghost isn't a performance artist, causing people to act like fools, speak in gibberish etc.
I think it would help if you provide a concrete definition of "sensual" or "flesh", and how that definition applies to videos #7, #11, #15, #17, because I'm struggling to see how it applies to those videos.
God is supernatural/spirit, so its normal for him to do spiritual/supernatural stuff
its just some people seem allergic to the things God can do, these things are "normal" for a christian in their walk with God.
The bible talks we can be filled with the Holy sprit this can be felt.
We can get 'living waters in our interior' this can be felt.
The glory of God we can experience this/feel.
Also that there is 'heavenly gifts' we can get a lot of that.
God can show his love to us doing things that are 'natural' for him like making you feel his love/presence and anointing etc.
And you can be transformed by God and be free of spiritual problems.
It's not the idea that God can do, and does, supernatural things that is at issue but what those supernatural things are and which of them are common and which are not.
Well, in light of all the Scripture I've already offered in earlier posts, are sensual and hyper-emotional "experiences" of God really of Him? The Scripture I've cited indicates not.
Oh? Where does Scripture teach this? And is the description of something in Scripture always prescriptive? Must the Holy Spirit be felt? Do any of the he writers of the NT tell us to pursue such feelings? If so, where?
Again, where is this taught in Scripture and where in the NT are we instructed to pursue these sensual experiences?
What gifts are you talking about, exactly? Where does Scripture say you can "get a lot of them"?
God can do anything He wants to do. Does He tell us in His word that He is concerned that we feel His love, or presence, or "anointing" (whatever that is)? If we don't feel these things, has He ceased to love us, or has He stopped being omnipresent?
Absolutely. But how does God in His word say He usually does His transforming work in us? Always through some sudden, spectacular change?
Yes the Holy spirit, his presence can be felt.
Living waters is your interior getting filled well with spirit which satisfies your spiritual thirst, this can be felt.
The glory of God can be felt, totally.
Gods love can be felt, totally.
I'm pretty sure of all of this. Certain actually since i'm not talking because the air is free but because it happened to me.
speaking of 'sensual' you may mean 'sensory' well, seeking God is going to produce some of this experiences since, his stuff like i described and that is in the bible
you are going to feel stuff but feeling is not the objective we should seek getting better and closer with God.
The closer you are to God the more probably you are going to feel stuff
but its not wrong to be eager to experience things like this
after all, they are from God,
Well, in light of all the Scripture I've already offered in earlier posts, are sensual and hyper-emotional "experiences" of God really of Him? The Scripture I've cited indicates not.
Must the Holy Spirit be felt? Do any of the he writers of the NT tell us to pursue such feelings? If so, where?
Again, where is this taught in Scripture and where in the NT are we instructed to pursue these sensual experiences?
God can do anything He wants to do. Does He tell us in His word that He is concerned that we feel His love, or presence, or "anointing" (whatever that is)?
No, but it would mean we are missing out.If we don't feel these things, has He ceased to love us, or has He stopped being omnipresent?
Absolutely. But how does God in His word say He usually does His transforming work in us? Always through some sudden, spectacular change?
This doesn't answer my question. It merely repeats what you've already said. Where does the Bible teach us the Holy Spirit can be felt? And in what way is he commonly, normally, felt? What do you mean by "felt"? Crying? Tingles and warm oozies? Convulsions on the floor? If this is what you mean, where is any of this taught in Scripture as being of the Spirit? The only people in the New Testament who were having convulsive attacks were those who were demon possessed. Not once does the Holy Spirit deal violently with anyone - not even when he killed Ananias and his wife, Sapphira.
I don't know what this means. Jesus is the Living Water. He comes to live within us in the Person of the Holy Spirit. (Romans 8:9-11) But does His coming to live within me mean I must feel that He has? If I don't feel Him, is He then not there? Do my feelings dictate what God has or hasn't done? Or does God's word dictate such things?
Maybe. Where do you see this in Scripture? And does such a description in the Bible mean we all ought to feel God's glory? Does the mere description of something in Scripture mean it is prescriptive for us today? Is such thinking not the "Is-Ought" fallacy? Seems like it to me.
I suppose. That it can does not mean that it must be felt, though, does it? God's wrath can be felt, too. Should we all feel His wrath, then? Our feeling of God's love has nothing whatever to do with whether or not He loves us, right? We know He loves us because He has told us in His word He does, not because we feel that He does, yes? What tells us what is true spiritually?: God's word or our feelings?
Your experience is not authoritative, I'm afraid. I don't believe anything about God based on what you have or haven't experienced. Your experiences can be mistaken but God's word cannot. So, I should trust the Bible, then, right?
Where in the Bible? And does the experience of someone in Scripture make their experience necessarily mine, too? How does that follow, exactly? Should I expect to be like Samson whose enormous physical power came from the Spirit? Should I go and wash in a dirty river like Naaman did in order to be healed of a disease? Should I go out and kill pagans, like the ancient Israelites? Obviously not. Just because these things are described in Scripture doesn't mean I ought to follow suit. Description is not prescription.
What "stuff" should the believer expect to feel? Conviction? Yes. Illumination? Yes. Comfort? Yes. Strengthening? Yes. Gratefulness? Yes. A desire for holiness? Yes. These are all things God's word says are common experiences of the Christian as they walk with God. Nowhere, though, does the Bible teach me that I should look for or desire tingles, or electrical sensations, or high emotions, or convulsive experiences and such like in my walk with God.
Oh? Where is this taught in the Bible? Doesn't it say that sensuality is of the flesh and anathema to the things of the Spirit? (See: Galatians 5:17; James 3:15)
What "stuff" do you mean? You haven't really said.
Actually, I have serious doubts that any of what you're thinking of is of God at all. Give my first post in this thread a read.
I'm still waiting for you to make the connection between the verses you cited and the videos you watched. I still don't see how those verses can apply to those testimonies.
Ephesians 5:18-20
18 Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery. Instead, be filled with the Spirit, 19 speaking to one another with psalms, hymns, and songs from the Spirit. Sing and make music from your heart to the Lord, 20 always giving thanks to God the Father for everything, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Please, define sensual.
John 7:37-39
37 On the last and greatest day of the festival, Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “Let anyone who is thirsty come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from within them.” 39 By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified.
Acts 1:7-8
7 He said to them: “It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority. 8 But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”
No, but it would mean we are missing out.
Acts 9:1-9
Meanwhile, Saul was still breathing out murderous threats against the Lord’s disciples. He went to the high priest 2 and asked him for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he found any there who belonged to the Way, whether men or women, he might take them as prisoners to Jerusalem. 3 As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. 4 He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?”
5 “Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked.
“I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,” he replied. 6 “Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”
7 The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. 8 Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. 9 For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything.
That's too bad. You'll be waiting a long time, I'm afraid for what you want from me concerning your videos. I already explained why.
The Fruit of the Spirit is joy, yes, and he will guide our minds in prayer and worship but does this happen necessarily in some overt, exaggerated manner, ala Benny Hinn? Does this quotation offer a basis for such thinking? Can the leading of the Spirit be so subtle and profound we cannot see it?
I did. See my last post to you.
Don't see the word "anointing" in these passages. Do you?
Does what happened in Acts 2 mandate that all Christians must have the same experience? Where is this indicated in Acts 2? Or anywhere else in Scripture? Again, description is not necessarily prescription.
These passages also don't indicate that being filled with the Spirit is necessarily a sensual business, though the Spirit indwelling and filling does result in action - in Acts 2, specifically evangelism.
On what? God has not ceased to love us just because we feel that He has or have no feeling to verify that He does. God's love for you doesn't rest on your feelings, right?
And do you know how long it was before Paul was prepared by God to serve Him as an apostle? Paul was by no means instantly made spiritually mature and ready for service by his experience on the Road to Damascus. And why should we think what happened to Paul on the Damascus Road should serve as any kind of a pattern for our own experience of God? Once again, description is not necessarily prescription.
That's too bad. You'll be waiting a long time, I'm afraid, for what you want from me concerning your videos. I already explained why.
The Fruit of the Spirit is joy, yes, and he will guide our minds in prayer and worship but does this happen necessarily in some overt, exaggerated manner, ala Benny Hinn? Does this quotation offer a basis for such thinking? Can the leading of the Spirit be so subtle and profound we cannot see it?
I did. See my last post to you.
Don't see the word "anointing" in these passages. Do you?
Does what happened in Acts 2 mandate that all Christians must have the same experience? Where is this indicated in Acts 2? Or anywhere else in Scripture? Again, description is not necessarily prescription.
These passages also don't indicate that being filled with the Spirit is necessarily a sensual business, though the Spirit indwelling and filling does result in action - in Acts 2, specifically evangelism.
On what? God has not ceased to love us just because we feel that He has or have no feeling to verify that He does. God's love for you doesn't rest on your feelings, right?
And do you know how long it was before Paul was prepared by God to serve Him as an apostle? Paul was by no means instantly made spiritually mature and ready for service by his experience on the Road to Damascus. And why should we think what happened to Paul on the Damascus Road should serve as any kind of a pattern for our own experience of God? Once again, description is not necessarily prescription.
Well, if you keep refusing to provide evidence to justify your claim that those testimonies are sensual and of the flesh in nature, then you are just making baseless claims. And as they say: what is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.That's too bad. You'll be waiting a long time, I'm afraid, for what you want from me concerning your videos. I already explained why.
The Fruit of the Spirit is joy, yes, and he will guide our minds in prayer and worship but does this happen necessarily in some overt, exaggerated manner, ala Benny Hinn? Does this quotation offer a basis for such thinking? Can the leading of the Spirit be so subtle and profound we cannot see it?
I did. See my last post to you.
Don't see the word "anointing" in these passages. Do you?
The exact same experience is not prescribed, but the book of Acts does make the point clear that those sorts of experiences are possible for Christians, both Jews and Gentiles. Please, read this question and the answers for more examples: Do all believers receive the Holy Spirit at conversion but only a few are filled with the Holy Spirit post conversion?Does what happened in Acts 2 mandate that all Christians must have the same experience? Where is this indicated in Acts 2? Or anywhere else in Scripture? Again, description is not necessarily prescription.
These passages also don't indicate that being filled with the Spirit is necessarily a sensual business, though the Spirit indwelling and filling does result in action - in Acts 2, specifically evangelism.
On what? God has not ceased to love us just because we feel that He has or have no feeling to verify that He does. God's love for you doesn't rest on your feelings, right?
And do you know how long it was before Paul was prepared by God to serve Him as an apostle? Paul was by no means instantly made spiritually mature and ready for service by his experience on the Road to Damascus. And why should we think what happened to Paul on the Damascus Road should serve as any kind of a pattern for our own experience of God? Once again, description is not necessarily prescription.
Well, if you keep refusing to provide evidence to justify your claim that those testimonies are sensual and of the flesh in nature, then you are just making baseless claims.
Why are you bringing up Benny Hinn? Have I mentioned or shared a video from Benny Hinn at any point in this thread?
You just provided verses talking about sin, you still haven't explained how those verses apply to the testimonies shared in the OP.
Isaiah 61:1-3
The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners, 2 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor and the day of vengeance of our God, to comfort all who mourn, 3 and provide for those who grieve in Zion— to bestow on them a crown of beauty instead of ashes, the oil of joy instead of mourning, and a garment of praise instead of a spirit of despair. They will be called oaks of righteousness, a planting of the Lord for the display of his splendor.
1 John 2:26-27:
26 I am writing these things to you about those who are trying to lead you astray. 27 As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.
The exact same experience is not prescribed, but the book of Acts does make the point clear that those sorts of experiences are possible for Christians, both Jews and Gentiles.
1) You are once again using the word "sensual", for which you have only provided verses that talk about sin. So unless you clarify once again what you truly mean by "sensual", I will take it as if you mean "sinful".
Thus, by making the replacement your sentence reads: "These passages also don't indicate that being filled with the Spirit is necessarily a sinful business", to which I reply: of course the Holy Spirit has nothing to do with sin, I never claimed such a thing (unless you meant something else with "sensual" - please clarify the term if so).
2) All examples of baptism in the Holy Spirit that you find in the book of Acts include a supernatural experience. Is there at least one example of baptism in the Holy Spirit in the whole Bible where the event was completely subconscious and the individual didn't consciously experience anything at all?
Right, but again, if you don't have a conscious experience of his love, you would be missing out on that conscious experience, that's all.
He certainly needed further maturing and training,
And though I agree with you that such an experience is not prescriptive, it does serve as a proof of concept to show that God can manifest in powerful ways to people as he sees fit,
there is no reason for trying to put God in a box and knee-jerkly dismiss every testimony out there just because we haven't been as fortunate to have experienced the same.
If you want to dismiss my remarks because I won't go through the very time-consuming effort of detailing in each video where the problems are, feel free. It didn't sound at the start of this thread that you were looking to get into a full-on debate, just for reactions to the videos. I gave you my reaction. Take it or leave it.
Did I say that you had brought up Benny Hinn?
I brought up Hinn in asking a question about the manner in which the Spirit acts upon us. He was representative of one extreme kind of experience some claim to have of the Spirit that I offered in contrast to a much more subtle way in which the Spirit works. I made no assertion that Hinn was representative of all those in the videos you offered. Paul Washer, for instance, is almost polar opposite in his basic doctrine and theology to Hinn.
The original verses didn't mention the word anointing, but they did mention the Holy Spirit. And the new verses I shared with you show that the Holy Spirit is the one anointing the Christians. And we have plenty of evidence in Scripture that people can certainly have powerful, conscious experiences with the Holy Spirit (see for example all the cases of baptism in the Holy Spirit in the book of Acts). Now, if what you are looking for is specific verses saying explicitly that "the anointing can be felt, and it feels like this", at the moment I can't think of any verse providing such a level of specific information on the matter, although, as I we have previously discussed, there are verses supporting that the Holy Spirit can make people consciously experience love, peace, joy, "rivers of living water" quenching their spiritual thirst, we have also the expression "baptism in the Holy Spirit and fire", and I know lots of testimonies of people reporting "heat" or "warmth" which matches very well with the "fire" part, etc.Um, these are different passages here. I am aware that Scripture speaks of the indwelling Spirit as an anointing from God. The verses to which I was making my remarks about the word "anointing" did not contain the word at all. How does posting these verses address this observation of mine on other verses?
It seems you didn't read the passages/verses carefully, nor post #46. In post #46, I defined very clearly what I mean by "sensual."
Where have I contended for a "completely subconscious" conversion experience (which is what the baptism of the Spirit is)? I wrote of a subtle and profound spiritual work that the Spirit does in us, but not one where the believer experiences nothing. So, why are you arguing as though I have?
When Phillip leads the ethiopian eunuch to faith in Christ, the ethiopian eunuch didn't speak in tongues, or convulse in spiritual ecstasy, or have a vision. He just "went away rejoicing." This, I think, is the much more common initial experience of those who are saved, who are baptized in the Spirit. It was the experience of the Philippian jailer and his family, too. They also were saved but simply rejoiced afterward, without any tongues-speaking, or flames of fire appearing over their heads, or anything else of an overt supernatural character.
God's love upon you is unconditional and thus does not depend on the amount of experiences you have had, I agree 100% with you on this. Having said that, there is evidence in Scripture that believers can certainly benefit from experiencing more of God, or there is even an invitation to believers to seek more of God.But "missing out" sounds like there is some value to having this "conscious experience of His love" that elevates the life of one having such an experience over one who does not. But, as I pointed out, God loves us just as much whether we feel He does or not. And it is God's love, not what I do or don't feel that is really important. So, I don't think not feeling God's love is "missing out" at all - at least, as I said, not on what's truly important.
Of course He can. I've never suggested otherwise. But is this the common way God interacts with us? I don't think so. Nor is it an experience with God we are ever told in Scripture to pursue.
Fair enough.Who has "put God in a box"? I haven't. God can do all that He wishes to do. He's God.
Fair enough. Would you mind sharing some of those testimonies?Who has dismissed "knee-jerkly" every testimony out there? I haven't. There are many wonderful Christian testimonies I have heard and thoroughly endorse.
Who has made such dismissals on the basis that they haven't had the same sort of experiences? I haven't. My case against at least certain elements of the various testimonies I heard was scripturally-based, not experience-based.
No, but feel free to share if you want.Do you know what experiences I've had with God?
You don't need to be exhaustive. Just pick the most representative example among the 4 videos you watched, the one that raised the most amount of red flags for you, and just find one sentence or whatever that they said that made you feel uncomfortable and think 'yes, this is what I call "sensual" or "fleshy"'. For sure there had to be at least one sentence or something they said that triggered your skepticism. Just one example, nothing exhaustive, just to illustrate the point, it shouldn't take you more than a few minutes. I think it's a fair compromise.