Trump Wins PA Legal battle

Pavel Mosko · Nov 12, 2020

Trump campaign wins case on Pa. voter ID deadline

Trump WINS Legal Battle In PA REJECTING Votes, But Trump Is Still FAR From Winning Legal Victory. A Court has sided with the Trump campaign barring certain votes in PA. While the legal victory may be minor for now it could possibly open the door for many more legal challenges brought by Trump. The Pennsylvania court rules that the secretary of state had no authority to change ballot deadlines and thus these ballots corrected by the 10th to 12th shall not be counted. While media and Democrats are celebrating Joe Biden as the president-elect they aren't countering Trump's actual legal challenges.

Goonie · Nov 12, 2020

Pavel Mosko said:
Trump campaign wins case on Pa. voter ID deadline

Trump WINS Legal Battle In PA REJECTING Votes, But Trump Is Still FAR From Winning Legal Victory. A Court has sided with the Trump campaign barring certain votes in PA. While the legal victory may be minor for now it could possibly open the door for many more legal challenges brought by Trump. The Pennsylvania court rules that the secretary of state had no authority to change ballot deadlines and thus these ballots corrected by the 10th to 12th shall not be counted. While media and Democrats are celebrating Joe Biden as the president-elect they aren't countering Trump's actual legal challenges.

Erm yes. Irrelevant, just as irrelevant as those Pennsylvania ballots received post election which have been segregated in regard to another supreme court decision. This is not voter fraud, and has no impact on this election (though will provide guidance for future ones).

NotreDame · Nov 12, 2020

Pavel Mosko said:
Trump campaign wins case on Pa. voter ID deadline

Trump WINS Legal Battle In PA REJECTING Votes, But Trump Is Still FAR From Winning Legal Victory. A Court has sided with the Trump campaign barring certain votes in PA. While the legal victory may be minor for now it could possibly open the door for many more legal challenges brought by Trump. The Pennsylvania court rules that the secretary of state had no authority to change ballot deadlines and thus these ballots corrected by the 10th to 12th shall not be counted. While media and Democrats are celebrating Joe Biden as the president-elect they aren't countering Trump's actual legal challenges.

Here’s the sobering reality. The ballots in question weren’t counted and were already segregated. They do not reduce Biden’s margin or subtract from his vote total.

essentialsaltes · Nov 12, 2020

FTA: These ballots had been segregated pending the judge’s decision and have not yet been counted, so their disqualification will not affect the current vote count in Pennsylvania.

Gene2memE · Nov 12, 2020

Hey, Tim Poole again! (Do you watch much else?)

As an aside, here's a moment of near self realization from Mr Poole:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1326709737979719682

whatbogsends · Nov 12, 2020

Notice that the only legal battle Trump has won involved the rules set for accepting ballots, and not anything involving any fraud or corruption by the Democrats.

Basil the Great · Nov 12, 2020

I expected that he would win this battle. However, the victory is probably only worth maybe 5,000-10,000 votes.

dzheremi · Nov 12, 2020

Gene2memE said:
Hey, Tim Poole again! (Do you watch much else?)

As an aside, here's a moment of near self realization from Mr Poole:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1326709737979719682

Yiiiiiiikes. That made me feel bad for the lady who has to sit there and listen to him have this 'revelation'.

Ahhh, President Trump and Tim Pool...birds of a feather blame everyone else together.

ReesePiece23 · Nov 12, 2020

The Boogeyman celebrates by making Trump some sandwiches...

GoldenBoy89 · Nov 12, 2020

I like how disenfranchising thousands of people from their votes is considered a win for Trump.

Kenny'sID · Nov 12, 2020

whatbogsends said:
Notice that the only legal battle Trump has won involved the rules set for accepting ballots, and not anything involving any fraud or corruption by the Democrats.

Changing ballot deadlines without the authority to do so, could very well constitute fraud or corruption.

Pavel Mosko said:
The Pennsylvania court rules that the secretary of state had no authority to change ballot deadlines and thus these ballots corrected by the 10th to 12th shall not be counted.

Tanj · Nov 12, 2020

Kenny'sID said:
Changing ballot deadlines without the authority to do so, could very well constitute fraud or corruption.

No it couldn't.

Kenny'sID · Nov 12, 2020

Tanj said:
No it couldn't.

Brilliant!

Hard to argue with that. Lol

Semper-Fi · Nov 12, 2020

Donald J. Trump 9h ·
Donald J. Trump

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” Chanel Rion, OANN

Tanj · Nov 12, 2020

Kenny'sID said:
Brilliant!

Hard to argue with that. Lol

Indeed...although you could post "yes it could", then we could rinse and repeat, see who gets rsi first.

However in the interest of something here's a more complete argument from my side.

In your system, legislature passes laws, officials pass rules/regulations. If someone doesn't like one of them they take it to court, and the court then decides if it's valid or not. However this doesn't mean that the originator of the law/reg has engaged in criminal activity. As a further example, the SCOTUS some time ago ruled the mandate bit of ACA was unconstitutional, so it got struck off. That doesn't mean the legislative group that passed the thing engaged in criminal activity.

Kenny'sID · Nov 12, 2020

Tanj said:
Indeed...although you could post "yes it could", then we could rinse and repeat, see who gets rsi first.

However in the interest of something here's a more complete argument from my side.

In your system, legislature passes laws, officials pass rules/regulations. If someone doesn't like one of them they take it to court, and the court then decides if it's valid or not. However this doesn't mean that the originator of the law/reg has engaged in criminal activity. As a further example, the SCOTUS some time ago ruled the mandate bit of ACA was unconstitutional, so it got struck off. That doesn't mean the legislative group that passed the thing engaged in criminal activity.

Was it not already a law, and done without authorization?

Tanj · Nov 12, 2020

Kenny'sID said:
Was it not already a law, and done without authorization?

She made a ruling, it got over turned. She made the ruling a few weeks ago, and the only person on the entire planet suggesting she get charged for it as a crime is you. So sure, it is possible the other 7 billion of us are wrong, but given that 7 billion includes the police, lawyers and courts, I'm gonna count it as a win.

Yttrium · Nov 12, 2020

Tanj said:
As a further example, the SCOTUS some time ago ruled the mandate bit of ACA was unconstitutional, so it got struck off. That doesn't mean the legislative group that passed the thing engaged in criminal activity.

No... they found it constitutional. In fact, Chief Justice Roberts declared that it was okay because it was essentially a tax, and congress has the right to create taxes. The Trump administration later zeroed out the fine for not having insurance, so the mandate is now meaningless.

I don't really want to step on your point though, it was a good one.

Kenny'sID · Nov 12, 2020

Tanj said:
She made a ruling, it got over turned. She made the ruling a few weeks ago, and the only person on the entire planet suggesting she get charged for it as a crime is you. So sure, it is possible the other 7 billion of us are wrong, but given that 7 billion includes the police, lawyers and courts, I'm gonna count it as a win.

When you begin to defend your stance with untrue comments, I begin to stop taking your ability to defend this seriousely. Maybe you are wrong and know it.

Tanj · Nov 12, 2020

Kenny'sID said:
When you begin to defend your stance with untrue comments, I begin to stop taking your ability to defend this seriousely. Maybe you are wrong and know it.

That all seems unlikely.

Trump Wins PA Legal battle

Arch-Dude of the Apostolic

Not so Mystic Mog.

Domer

Stranger in a Strange Land

Newbie

Senior Veteran

Well-Known Member

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian

The Peanut Buttery Member.

We're Still Here

Well-Known Member

Redefined comfortable middle class

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Redefined comfortable middle class

Well-Known Member

Redefined comfortable middle class

Independent Centrist

Well-Known Member

Redefined comfortable middle class

Similar threads