Taking Questions on Christianity

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
From the little I've seen of the Jewish take on translations (which is minimal I've only just started researching it), they aren't impressed at all by the Greek translation of the old testament. They say it has a lot of inaccuracies
Thanks Rose, that's interesting.

I wonder what theyd recommend then as a good enough option? Short of learning Hebrew that is.
 
Upvote 0

RoseCrystal

Active Member
Site Supporter
Jun 10, 2018
354
227
Australia
✟294,530.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Thanks Rose, that's interesting.

I wonder what theyd recommend then as a good enough option? Short of learning Hebrew that is.
LOL pretty sure the preferred way is to learn hebrew!

But I have been reading it online here, this is a well respected Jewish approved website, so you can trust the information given here.

Classic Jewish Texts
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTrueWay
Upvote 0

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
  • Like
Reactions: RoseCrystal
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,046
51,497
Guam
✟4,907,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Belief seems to hinge on the bible being trustworthy and God having ultimately authored it, being trustworthy too.
Yes, indeed.
TheTrueWay said:
Are all the contradictions and inconsistencies due to inadequacies in translation?
On principle, I say there are no contradictions ... just paradoxes. Most so-called contradictions can be resolved with just a little more research into a matter, and studying the context.

Take this doosey for example:

2 Samuel 24:1 And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.

Yet, in Chronicles, it says:

1 Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

Who prompted David to number Israel and Judah? God or Satan?

The answer is: both did.

God allowed Satan to prompt David, but God took the credit.

We see this principle in the book of Job, where Satan does this, that, and the other thing to Job, yet God takes the credit in the end:

Job 42:11 Then came there unto him all his brethren, and all his sisters, and all they that had been of his acquaintance before, and did eat bread with him in his house: and they bemoaned him, and comforted him over all the evil that the LORD had brought upon him: every man also gave him a piece of money, and every one an earring of gold.

That's what apologetics is all about!
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TheTrueWay
Upvote 0

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Yes, indeed.On principle, I say there are no contradictions ... just paradoxes. Most so-called contradictions can be resolved with just a little more research into a matter, and studying the context.

Take this doosey for example:

2 Samuel 24:1 And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.

Yet, in Chronicles, it says:

1 Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

Who prompted David to number Israel and Judah? God or Satan?

The answer is: both did.

God allowed Satan to prompt David, but God took the credit.

We see this principle in the book of Job, where Satan does this, that, and the other thing to Job, yet God takes the credit in the end:

Job 42:11 Then came there unto him all his brethren, and all his sisters, and all they that had been of his acquaintance before, and did eat bread with him in his house: and they bemoaned him, and comforted him over all the evil that the LORD had brought upon him: every man also gave him a piece of money, and every one an earring of gold.

That's what apologetics is all about!
Thanks for your reply. For reference I thought it may be helpful to have a definition of the term 'paradox' here:-

Paradox: A seemingly absurd or contradictory statement or proposition which, when investigated, may prove to be well founded or true.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

RoseCrystal

Active Member
Site Supporter
Jun 10, 2018
354
227
Australia
✟294,530.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
@TheTrueWay
I find this difference between the Hebrew and the Greek very interesting

Isaiah 7:14 Jewish Bible (english translation from orignal Hebrew)
Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel.

Isaiah 7:14 KJV
14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
 
Upvote 0

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
@TheTrueWay
I find this difference between the Hebrew and the Greek very interesting

Isaiah 7:14 Jewish Bible (english translation from orignal Hebrew)
Therefore, the Lord, of His own, shall give you a sign; behold, the young woman is with child, and she shall bear a son, and she shall call his name Immanuel.

Isaiah 7:14 KJV
14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Because the Jewish bible doesn't say virgin?

I don't know why but that's not been something to make me struggle.

It's more been the volume of supposed contradictions and inconsistencies that are found on atheist or exchristian sites.

But I've just been watching a video by Mike Winger on YouTube which looks at some of these which I'm finding helpful.

 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: RoseCrystal
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,427
26,867
Pacific Northwest
✟731,303.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Belief seems to hinge on the bible being trustworthy and God having ultimately authored it, being trustworthy too.

Are all the contradictions and inconsistencies due to inadequacies in translation?

(I'd be very interested to know if original Hebrew and Greek texts had similar contradictions and inconsistencies.)

Inerrantists would argue that no inconsistencies exist or can exist. But one doesn't have to subscribe to inerrantism to believe in the divine inspiration of the Bible or in its authority within the Christian religion.

Biblical trustworthiness, as a general concept and as it relates to the importance of Scripture within the Christian Church and the Christian faith is not, itself, conditional upon the sort of inerrantist narrative often promulgated in modern times (largely from more fundamentalist-leaning modern Protestants); only that it is a faithful text that bears Christ and points to Christ.

To give a specific example:

"And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to the king: in Israel there were 800,000 valiant men who drew the sword, and the men of Judah were 500,000." - 2 Samuel 24:9

"And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to David. In all Israel there were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword, and in Judah 470,000 who drew the sword." - 1 Chronicles 21:5

For someone who subscribes to a rigid inerrantist position, this disparity would be viewed as a problem that needs to be resolved by finding some kind of explanation that can create a perfect harmony.

However, this inconsistency just isn't that big of a deal in the overall point of the Bible and what the Bible means in Christianity.

Divine inspiration does not mean that God is the personal author of the Bible, so that every single tiny piece of minutia was deliberately put there by Divine fiat, or as though the human writers were suddenly stricken by a case of automatic handwriting and were being puppeteered by God. Now, that is, more-or-less the view of some Christians, but it's never been the Christian view.

More representative of the historic Christian view is this statement by St. Augustine of Hippo,

"Remember beloved, that God has only one Utterance spread throughout all of Scripture. And through the mouths of holy persons that one Word resounds, He that was in the beginning God with God." - Ennarations on the Psalms, 103.4.1

For Augustine the Scriptures are a resounding, sonorous orchestra through which there is but the single, one, undivided Word of God, Jesus Christ Himself. When one hears the Scriptures being read, the Word being heard is Jesus. And this isn't some kind of metaphor, or just flowery purple prose--there is literally Jesus here.

Over a thousand years later Martin Luther echoes this same sentiment,

"Here [in the Scriptures] you will find the swaddling clothes and the manger in which Christ lies."

Also saying,

"It is for Christ's sake that we believe in the Scriptures, but it is not for the Scriptures' sake that we believe in Christ."

The Church's faith in Jesus does not derive from the Bible.
Rather, the Church's confession and acceptance of the books which make up the Bible is derived from her faith in Jesus Christ.

Christ comes first, and the Scriptures are there to point us back to Him.

Placing the Bible before Christ is the cart before the horse, it is fundamentally backward. Not to mention, quite frankly, idolatrous.

So it's not about the Bible being inerrant in all possible ways; it's about the Bible being the sonorous melody of Christ Himself to His Church in and through these texts. Not in a merely poetical way, but in a very real, in fact very literal way. Christ says, "My sheep hear My voice". The voice of Christ is not some ethereal, detached, disembodied voice that the individual Christian just hears inside their head or something--it is the word He has spoken, His own very Gospel, that Gospel which is heard in the Scriptures, which is preached, and which is connected in and with the tangible elements of the Sacraments. That's Christ's voice, the Good Shepherd speaks here in this word, and it is faith that believes and clings to this word.

So worrying over things, such as how many soldiers David had--as just an example--is fundamentally worrying over nothing. It just doesn't matter. What matters is Christ. The chief way Christianity reads the Bible is Christocentric, Christ as center, Christ is the whole, Christ is the point and the purpose and the Word Himself present in these texts which makes us alive.

I once heard another Lutheran--though I wish I could remember who, and when--put it this way: It's not so much about us reading the Bible, as it is the Bible reading us. It's not so much about us interpreting the Bible, as it is about the Bible interpreting us. And that only makes sense, in a Christian context, in the context of faith in Jesus and the idea that what makes the Bible sacred, what makes the Bible holy is Jesus. The Bible, as "the word of God", only makes sense Christocentrically.

-CryptoLutheran
 
  • Like
Reactions: jacks
Upvote 0

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Inerrantists would argue that no inconsistencies exist or can exist. But one doesn't have to subscribe to inerrantism to believe in the divine inspiration of the Bible or in its authority within the Christian religion.

Biblical trustworthiness, as a general concept and as it relates to the importance of Scripture within the Christian Church and the Christian faith is not, itself, conditional upon the sort of inerrantist narrative often promulgated in modern times (largely from more fundamentalist-leaning modern Protestants); only that it is a faithful text that bears Christ and points to Christ.

To give a specific example:

"And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to the king: in Israel there were 800,000 valiant men who drew the sword, and the men of Judah were 500,000." - 2 Samuel 24:9

"And Joab gave the sum of the numbering of the people to David. In all Israel there were 1,100,000 men who drew the sword, and in Judah 470,000 who drew the sword." - 1 Chronicles 21:5

For someone who subscribes to a rigid inerrantist position, this disparity would be viewed as a problem that needs to be resolved by finding some kind of explanation that can create a perfect harmony.

However, this inconsistency just isn't that big of a deal in the overall point of the Bible and what the Bible means in Christianity.

Divine inspiration does not mean that God is the personal author of the Bible, so that every single tiny piece of minutia was deliberately put there by Divine fiat, or as though the human writers were suddenly stricken by a case of automatic handwriting and were being puppeteered by God. Now, that is, more-or-less the view of some Christians, but it's never been the Christian view.

More representative of the historic Christian view is this statement by St. Augustine of Hippo,

"Remember beloved, that God has only one Utterance spread throughout all of Scripture. And through the mouths of holy persons that one Word resounds, He that was in the beginning God with God." - Ennarations on the Psalms, 103.4.1

For Augustine the Scriptures are a resounding, sonorous orchestra through which there is but the single, one, undivided Word of God, Jesus Christ Himself. When one hears the Scriptures being read, the Word being heard is Jesus. And this isn't some kind of metaphor, or just flowery purple prose--there is literally Jesus here.

Over a thousand years later Martin Luther echoes this same sentiment,

"Here [in the Scriptures] you will find the swaddling clothes and the manger in which Christ lies."

Also saying,

"It is for Christ's sake that we believe in the Scriptures, but it is not for the Scriptures' sake that we believe in Christ."

The Church's faith in Jesus does not derive from the Bible.
Rather, the Church's confession and acceptance of the books which make up the Bible is derived from her faith in Jesus Christ.

Christ comes first, and the Scriptures are there to point us back to Him.

Placing the Bible before Christ is the cart before the horse, it is fundamentally backward. Not to mention, quite frankly, idolatrous.

So it's not about the Bible being inerrant in all possible ways; it's about the Bible being the sonorous melody of Christ Himself to His Church in and through these texts. Not in a merely poetical way, but in a very real, in fact very literal way. Christ says, "My sheep hear My voice". The voice of Christ is not some ethereal, detached, disembodied voice that the individual Christian just hears inside their head or something--it is the word He has spoken, His own very Gospel, that Gospel which is heard in the Scriptures, which is preached, and which is connected in and with the tangible elements of the Sacraments. That's Christ's voice, the Good Shepherd speaks here in this word, and it is faith that believes and clings to this word.

So worrying over things, such as how many soldiers David had--as just an example--is fundamentally worrying over nothing. It just doesn't matter. What matters is Christ. The chief way Christianity reads the Bible is Christocentric, Christ as center, Christ is the whole, Christ is the point and the purpose and the Word Himself present in these texts which makes us alive.

I once heard another Lutheran--though I wish I could remember who, and when--put it this way: It's not so much about us reading the Bible, as it is the Bible reading us. It's not so much about us interpreting the Bible, as it is about the Bible interpreting us. And that only makes sense, in a Christian context, in the context of faith in Jesus and the idea that what makes the Bible sacred, what makes the Bible holy is Jesus. The Bible, as "the word of God", only makes sense Christocentrically.

-CryptoLutheran
Thanks for writing.

So when Jesus says 'my sheep hear my voice", he is meaning they listen to understand what I am telling them in the bible and follow instructions from it? Rather than hearing a voice talk to them.
 
Upvote 0

OtherSheep

Active Member
Nov 1, 2020
81
23
wi
✟1,154.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
He comes upon us at the moment of salvation.

How does that square with what Jesus says about the Holy Spirit?

14:23 "Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love Me, he will keep My words: and My Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. ... 26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in My name, He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Robban

-----------
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2009
11,313
3,057
✟649,449.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Divorced
Yes, indeed.On principle, I say there are no contradictions ... just paradoxes. Most so-called contradictions can be resolved with just a little more research into a matter, and studying the context.

Take this doosey for example:

2 Samuel 24:1 And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.

Yet, in Chronicles, it says:

1 Chronicles 21:1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

Who prompted David to number Israel and Judah? God or Satan?

The answer is: both did.

God allowed Satan to prompt David, but God took the credit.

We see this principle in the book of Job, where Satan does this, that, and the other thing to Job, yet God takes the credit in the end:

Job 42:11 Then came there unto him all his brethren, and all his sisters, and all they that had been of his acquaintance before, and did eat bread with him in his house: and they bemoaned him, and comforted him over all the evil that the LORD had brought upon him: every man also gave him a piece of money, and every one an earring of gold.

That's what apologetics is all about!

Coming at it from another angle,

We are fortunate today that the Sages and scholars that have gone before have done the work.
These giants studied so hard it was not uncommon that they would end up wet though with sweat.

It does not relieve us of the obligation to study though.
Example,
In the example you and via took,

Rashi gives two explanations, a short one and a long one.
The long one is very, very long,

here is the short one;

Joab made two lists, a long and a short.
He said:
I shall show him the short one but if he gets angry
then I will show him the long one.

If something seems to contradict then one must find a peacemaker.

A piece of scripture, verse or passage that fits in between and consoles the two parts, makes peace between them.

But it is all about study, nothing that can be done in a coffee break, a lifetime and then only scratching the surface.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,046
51,497
Guam
✟4,907,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How does that square with what Jesus says about the Holy Spirit?
The Holy Spirit came to earth (to stay) ten days after Jesus' ascension.

Prior to that, in Old Testament times, He made "cameo appearances" as needed; such as when He came to assist Bezaleel, the chief artificer in the building of the Tabernacle in the Wilderness.

After Jesus' ascension, He came here to stay, and will go up in the Rapture.

The technical term for this is: ontological subordination.

That is, one member of the Godhead is active, while the other two take a passive role.

It goes like this:

Old Testament - birth of Christ: JEHOVAH active, Jesus and Holy Ghost passive.

Birth of Christ - Pentecost: Jesus active, JEHOVAH and Holy Ghost passive.

Pentecost - Rapture: Holy Ghost active, JEHOVAH and Jesus passive.

Rapture - end of Millennial Reign: Jesus active, JEHOVAH and Holy Ghost passive.

New Heaven and New Earth: all Three active (?)
 
Upvote 0

OtherSheep

Active Member
Nov 1, 2020
81
23
wi
✟1,154.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The Holy Spirit came to earth (to stay) ten days after Jesus' ascension.

After Jesus' ascension, He came here to stay, and will go up in the Rapture.

What happened between the first and second of these following verses? I doubt that prison gave John amnesia. I believe that, by the Holy Spirit abiding upon Jesus, John the Baptist no longer had Him... that Jesus had all of the Holy Spirit there was to have.

John 1:32 "And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon Him."

Matthew 11:3 "And said unto Him, Art thou he that should come, or do we look for another?"


And that we wouldn't have any of the Holy Spirit if Jesus were still here and disconnected from the Father, apart from the conduit of the Holy Spirit. By returning to the Father, as Jesus says, He became glorified as He was in the beginning, and no longer had need of a conduit, so to speak.

John 16:7 "Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send Him unto you."


That when Jesus gave up the Ghost, the Holy Spirit was released from the sole-occupancy of Jesus only.

Matthew 27:50 "Jesus, when He had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the Ghost."


On the same day as the Resurrection, says John, the Discipled Apostles were breathed upon, and received the Holy Spirit.

John 20:17 "Jesus saith unto her, Touch Me not; for I am not yet ascended to My Father: but go to My brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto My Father, and your Father; and [to] My God, and your God. ... 19 Then the same day at evening, being the first [day] of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace [be] unto you. ... 22 And when He had said this, He breathed on [them], and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:"

Jesus says nothing about a snatching away, apart from the verses about the wheat and tares. (Jesus is my only yardstick.) So, I don't know what that last bit I quoted of yours means. If the Holy Spirit were to go away, there would be no source of power for the two witnesses to prophecy and pray plagues and draught. Your rapture thingy must happen before then, right?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,046
51,497
Guam
✟4,907,063.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What happened between the first and second of these following verses? I doubt that prison gave John amnesia. I believe that, by the Holy Spirit abiding upon Jesus, John the Baptist no longer had Him... that Jesus had all of the Holy Spirit there was to have.
I'm confused.

Are you saying the Holy Spirit only resides on one person at a time?

If so, how do you explain this?

Numbers 11:16 And the LORD said unto Moses, Gather unto me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom thou knowest to be the elders of the people, and officers over them; and bring them unto the tabernacle of the congregation, that they may stand there with thee.
17 And I will come down and talk with thee there: and I will take of the spirit which is upon thee, and will put it upon them; and they shall bear the burden of the people with thee, that thou bear it not thyself alone.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,427
26,867
Pacific Northwest
✟731,303.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Thanks for writing.

So when Jesus says 'my sheep hear my voice", he is meaning they listen to understand what I am telling them in the bible and follow instructions from it? Rather than hearing a voice talk to them.

The Bible is an integral part of it, for the reasons I described already concerning the meaning and significance of Scripture. The focus I want to make, however, is the word. Christ's word; so yes the Bible, but also the preaching of the Gospel, the Sacraments. It's not just the ink that's on paper, it's the living word of the Gospel which is there attached to water in Baptism, there attached to bread and wine as the Eucharist, attached to the voice of the pastor pronouncing Absolution. Whenever and however that word goes out, it is alive, living. It's Christ's word, it is Christ speaking and present.

When someone tells you that Christ died for you, that He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, buried, dead, and that He rose from the dead, and that in Him you are forgiven, saved, justified, etc. That is Christ's word to you. It is what He says for you, to you. And His word is eternal life.

"Simon Peter answered him, 'Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,'" - John 6:68

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The Bible is an integral part of it, for the reasons I described already concerning the meaning and significance of Scripture. The focus I want to make, however, is the word. Christ's word; so yes the Bible, but also the preaching of the Gospel, the Sacraments. It's not just the ink that's on paper, it's the living word of the Gospel which is there attached to water in Baptism, there attached to bread and wine as the Eucharist, attached to the voice of the pastor pronouncing Absolution. Whenever and however that word goes out, it is alive, living. It's Christ's word, it is Christ speaking and present.

When someone tells you that Christ died for you, that He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, buried, dead, and that He rose from the dead, and that in Him you are forgiven, saved, justified, etc. That is Christ's word to you. It is what He says for you, to you. And His word is eternal life.

"Simon Peter answered him, 'Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life,'" - John 6:68

-CryptoLutheran
Hi, thank you for being so patient. The question I asked is something I have wrestled with and I think you are saying yes in reply to that???

I think from what you've shared and God speaking through scripture you've shared that I can come back to faith. Do you think that may be the case?

However I also think I need to look at and learn from the reason(s) I fell away. I think some of it has been addressed here.....I had a shaky foundation being told I could have a relationship with God if I would say a prayer and get water baptised but without explaining what relationship really means when making a commitment to God. So I began with my own assumptions.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,427
26,867
Pacific Northwest
✟731,303.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Hi, thank you for being so patient. The question I asked is something I have wrestled with and I think you are saying yes in reply to that???

I think from what you've shared and God speaking through scripture you've shared that I can come back to faith. Do you think that may be the case?

Luther called Christ the bloodhound of heaven, being relentless in His pursuit of us by His love. I don't believe that there is anyone, anyone whatsoever, there is nobody that is outside of the reach of grace, that mercy is universal, God's love is incomprehensibly vast.

If having at one time believed, but now feel estranged from Christ, He is there at the door as we read in the Revelation. Notice that "See, I stand at the door and knock" is said to Christians. He stands and knocks, because He has never left. There is no such thing as falling too far, or being estranged for too long--there is always Christ, there, where He has always been.

He is right there in the Scriptures. He is right there in the Sacraments. He is there in the preaching of the Gospel. He is there. His word is consistent, He is faithful and He is true, and His word never falters.

Christ right from the beginning said, "Repent, for the kingdom of God is near, believe the good news!" Repent and believe. Very often this is treated like something that only applies to non-Christians as a target goal for proselytizing--but this is Christ's word to us that believe as well. The call on us to repentance is the call to a life of repentance, to carry our cross as disciples of Jesus in this world. The call to believe in the Gospel is the call to keep our eyes on Christ, who goes before us. It is this call of life that we read about in the Epistle to the Hebrews, who speaks of the many saints who have come before us who are as a great "cloud of witnesses", the cheering, encouraging crowds of saints and martyrs who have already fought the fight, who have ran the race before us. And they cheer for us, as we set our gaze upon the finish line, upon the goal, the prize set before us, Jesus Christ our Lord, who is the author and finisher of our faith. That is, He is our archegos (translated often as "author" but meaning more like captain, chief prince, the leader) and the teleiotes (translated as "finisher" or "perfecter", that is, that or the one that completes or makes perfect, that which makes full). Christ is our Captain, the team leader who has gone on ahead of us, the goal and the prize Himself, who commands and calls us to faith and makes that faith full and perfect with Himself as the goal. Christ our Captain and Goal.

However I also think I need to look at and learn from the reason(s) I fell away. I think some of it has been addressed here.....I had a shaky foundation being told I could have a relationship with God if I would say a prayer and get water baptised but without explaining what relationship really means when making a commitment to God. So I began with my own assumptions.

From the Lutheran perspective, placing the onus on the individual sinner to get things right with God is held as the chief theological error. We call it the Opinio Legis in Latin, or "Opinion of the Law". This is the opinion, or the idea, that if we just try hard enough, if we just strive, or put in enough effort then we can, by our own abilities, make things right between us and God. It is called the Opinion of the Law because it is an idea based upon believing that by obedience to God's commands, by attaining a good legal standing (as it were) in relation to God's Law and commands, that we can therefore reach a place of harmony, peace, and justice in relation to God. That is, the Opinion of the Law boils down to me relating to God through the commandments and Law of God, and seeing my relationship with and toward God in the framework of my own obedience and my ability to be in some way just.

This Opinion of the Law is, as said, regarded as the chief theological error. By framing our relationship toward God as our own power and obedience to do, say, think, believe, or even feel all the right things. And then to regard God's relation toward us based upon our own performance, upon how well we get all our ducks in a row, or all our i's dotted properly, or t's crossed.

This will always shipwreck faith.

Through the Opinion of the Law we behold God wrongly, we behold God's face as though with a dark storm cloud veiled across, and He is hidden, and distant, and terrifyingly angry. This is why so many, when they operate from within this framework, see God as angry. They see God as an angry distant ruler who demands appeasement, and who will smite or strike down any who fail to meet the harsh demands of the Law.

Instead we argue that we must instead see God in faith, and to behold God in faith is to behold Jesus Christ who suffered death for our sakes. To behold God through the Gospel. To see God in Christ is to see the Fatherly, friendly heart of God as Christ has spoken about Him. For Christ says, "If you have seen Me, you have seen the Father" and "If you have known Me, you have known the Father". In Christ we encounter the One whom Christ calls "Father" and whom Christ extends to us the grace of adoption, that we also might call His Father our Father. And so He invites us to pray, "Our Father who art in heaven"

This is the distinction between the false theologies of glory, and the true theology of the cross.

Theology of glory has man wishing to speak of the invisible things of God such as His power, glory, wisdom etc and looks to human efforts--believing that glory can reach glory, wisdom can reach wisdom, or some such. He says "If only I could be more wise" or "If only I could be more holy" then God, who is wise and holy might accept me.

But the theology of the cross speaks of the manifest, visible things of God, namely that He took on flesh, became humble, suffered the shameful death of the cross. God confounds the wise and the strong by choosing foolishness and weakness. It is not about attaining glory in this life, it is not about being the wisest, the strongest, or the "most spiritual"; it is about God Himself come down in Christ; Christ who though very God "did not consider equality with God something to be exploited, but instead emptied Himself, becoming a human slave" (Philippians 2:6-7).

I am not made right by my efforts; I am made right by God's loving kindness in Jesus Christ.
My relationship to and with God is not based upon my own power, my wisdom, my strength, my moral ability, by being "very spiritual", by being the "most moral" or any such thing. Rather my relationship to and with God is based upon His love for me and the whole world in Jesus Christ.

That is why when I speak of Word and Sacrament as the "place" where Christ is, where Christ speaks, etc, I am speaking of God-come-down. God in the weak, the humble, and the mundane. God is not distant waiting for us to go up to meet Him, He is down here with us through these humble, seemingly meager gifts of preaching, water, bread and wine. One does not look at the bread and wine of the Eucharist and think, "That is God in the flesh", that is an absurd notion. But it is precisely what it is, it is very Christ, His very flesh and His very blood. This is foolishness, it is weakness--and it is precisely in this weak, foolish, mundane, lowly things that God is active and present and giving us faith and sustaining us and making us holy.

When we receive the elements of the Eucharist we are literally eating God. I don't think we can get more personal than that. We are seated at Christ's Table, and Christ literally gives Himself to us.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Luther called Christ the bloodhound of heaven, being relentless in His pursuit of us by His love. I don't believe that there is anyone, anyone whatsoever, there is nobody that is outside of the reach of grace, that mercy is universal, God's love is incomprehensibly vast.

If having at one time believed, but now feel estranged from Christ, He is there at the door as we read in the Revelation. Notice that "See, I stand at the door and knock" is said to Christians. He stands and knocks, because He has never left. There is no such thing as falling too far, or being estranged for too long--there is always Christ, there, where He has always been.

He is right there in the Scriptures. He is right there in the Sacraments. He is there in the preaching of the Gospel. He is there. His word is consistent, He is faithful and He is true, and His word never falters.

Christ right from the beginning said, "Repent, for the kingdom of God is near, believe the good news!" Repent and believe. Very often this is treated like something that only applies to non-Christians as a target goal for proselytizing--but this is Christ's word to us that believe as well. The call on us to repentance is the call to a life of repentance, to carry our cross as disciples of Jesus in this world. The call to believe in the Gospel is the call to keep our eyes on Christ, who goes before us. It is this call of life that we read about in the Epistle to the Hebrews, who speaks of the many saints who have come before us who are as a great "cloud of witnesses", the cheering, encouraging crowds of saints and martyrs who have already fought the fight, who have ran the race before us. And they cheer for us, as we set our gaze upon the finish line, upon the goal, the prize set before us, Jesus Christ our Lord, who is the author and finisher of our faith. That is, He is our archegos (translated often as "author" but meaning more like captain, chief prince, the leader) and the teleiotes (translated as "finisher" or "perfecter", that is, that or the one that completes or makes perfect, that which makes full). Christ is our Captain, the team leader who has gone on ahead of us, the goal and the prize Himself, who commands and calls us to faith and makes that faith full and perfect with Himself as the goal. Christ our Captain and Goal.



From the Lutheran perspective, placing the onus on the individual sinner to get things right with God is held as the chief theological error. We call it the Opinio Legis in Latin, or "Opinion of the Law". This is the opinion, or the idea, that if we just try hard enough, if we just strive, or put in enough effort then we can, by our own abilities, make things right between us and God. It is called the Opinion of the Law because it is an idea based upon believing that by obedience to God's commands, by attaining a good legal standing (as it were) in relation to God's Law and commands, that we can therefore reach a place of harmony, peace, and justice in relation to God. That is, the Opinion of the Law boils down to me relating to God through the commandments and Law of God, and seeing my relationship with and toward God in the framework of my own obedience and my ability to be in some way just.

This Opinion of the Law is, as said, regarded as the chief theological error. By framing our relationship toward God as our own power and obedience to do, say, think, believe, or even feel all the right things. And then to regard God's relation toward us based upon our own performance, upon how well we get all our ducks in a row, or all our i's dotted properly, or t's crossed.

This will always shipwreck faith.

Through the Opinion of the Law we behold God wrongly, we behold God's face as though with a dark storm cloud veiled across, and He is hidden, and distant, and terrifyingly angry. This is why so many, when they operate from within this framework, see God as angry. They see God as an angry distant ruler who demands appeasement, and who will smite or strike down any who fail to meet the harsh demands of the Law.

Instead we argue that we must instead see God in faith, and to behold God in faith is to behold Jesus Christ who suffered death for our sakes. To behold God through the Gospel. To see God in Christ is to see the Fatherly, friendly heart of God as Christ has spoken about Him. For Christ says, "If you have seen Me, you have seen the Father" and "If you have known Me, you have known the Father". In Christ we encounter the One whom Christ calls "Father" and whom Christ extends to us the grace of adoption, that we also might call His Father our Father. And so He invites us to pray, "Our Father who art in heaven"

This is the distinction between the false theologies of glory, and the true theology of the cross.

Theology of glory has man wishing to speak of the invisible things of God such as His power, glory, wisdom etc and looks to human efforts--believing that glory can reach glory, wisdom can reach wisdom, or some such. He says "If only I could be more wise" or "If only I could be more holy" then God, who is wise and holy might accept me.

But the theology of the cross speaks of the manifest, visible things of God, namely that He took on flesh, became humble, suffered the shameful death of the cross. God confounds the wise and the strong by choosing foolishness and weakness. It is not about attaining glory in this life, it is not about being the wisest, the strongest, or the "most spiritual"; it is about God Himself come down in Christ; Christ who though very God "did not consider equality with God something to be exploited, but instead emptied Himself, becoming a human slave" (Philippians 2:6-7).

I am not made right by my efforts; I am made right by God's loving kindness in Jesus Christ.
My relationship to and with God is not based upon my own power, my wisdom, my strength, my moral ability, by being "very spiritual", by being the "most moral" or any such thing. Rather my relationship to and with God is based upon His love for me and the whole world in Jesus Christ.

That is why when I speak of Word and Sacrament as the "place" where Christ is, where Christ speaks, etc, I am speaking of God-come-down. God in the weak, the humble, and the mundane. God is not distant waiting for us to go up to meet Him, He is down here with us through these humble, seemingly meager gifts of preaching, water, bread and wine. One does not look at the bread and wine of the Eucharist and think, "That is God in the flesh", that is an absurd notion. But it is precisely what it is, it is very Christ, His very flesh and His very blood. This is foolishness, it is weakness--and it is precisely in this weak, foolish, mundane, lowly things that God is active and present and giving us faith and sustaining us and making us holy.

When we receive the elements of the Eucharist we are literally eating God. I don't think we can get more personal than that. We are seated at Christ's Table, and Christ literally gives Himself to us.

-CryptoLutheran

Thank you for sharing....its given me food for thought.

You had me right up until you talked of communion because I dont see communion as literal but rather as symbolic.
 
Upvote 0

OtherSheep

Active Member
Nov 1, 2020
81
23
wi
✟1,154.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm confused.

Are you saying the Holy Spirit only resides on one person at a time?

If so, how do you explain this?

Numbers 11:16 And the LORD said unto Moses, Gather unto me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom thou knowest to be the elders of the people, and officers over them; and bring them unto the tabernacle of the congregation, that they may stand there with thee.
17 And I will come down and talk with thee there: and I will take of the spirit which is upon thee, and will put it upon them; and they shall bear the burden of the people with thee, that thou bear it not thyself alone.

No, that's not what I said at all. When Jesus came to earth, and was baptized, the Holy Spirit rested on Him. Jesus says that He has many things to say to them that they could not yet bear, but they would when the Holy Spirit came to them. And that if He did not go the Holy Spirit wouldn't come to them. John the Baptist is said to have had the Holy Spirit even in the womb, but after Jesus was given the Holy Spirit, John didn't know that Jesus was the Messiah... which was the reason John came baptizing, according to him... and John saw the Holy Spirit rest upon Jesus, and heard the voice of the Father call down from Heaven, proclaiming the sonship of Jesus Christ. This math, to me, means the Holy Spirit couldn't be in anyone but Jesus until the same day at evening when Jesus breathed on His chosen Apostles.

Now, Jesus tells us that those who keep His commandments are given remembrance of what Jesus said and told what He meant, and told what would come to pass. Keep in mind it is only what Jesus said that would be sanctioned by the Holy Spirit. Which is why the last verses of Matthew says Jesus told them to teach what Jesus taught... so that the Holy Spirit would be of use to those who believe on Jesus through the words His Discipled-Apostles spoke, as the Scripture says.

If you love Me, keep My commandments, and My Father will love you, and We will come to you and make Our abode. Only those who keep Jesus' Commandments are loved by God. And only those who keep Jesus' Commandments will be given the Holy Spirit.

More than one person at a time are currently keeping Jesus' Commandments. Of these will be sealed the 144,000 who are called, chosen, and faithful. For all we know, that number has yet to be reached. Since the two witnesses are the divided kingdom, joined as one by the Holy Spirit, this is the nation which is given the Kingdom of God that Jesus spoke of in Matthew 21. I believe we're waiting for Judah's southern 3 tribes to say Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TheTrueWay

Active Member
Aug 7, 2020
125
109
Uk
✟28,515.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
@ViaCrucis , I just reread my last post and I'm sorry I hadnt realised it was so abrupt. I wrote it when I was tired.

I do really want to come back to Christ, I just think I need to try to figure out what's been wrong on my side so I learn from it.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Tigger45
Upvote 0