I'm not sure what your agenda is to lie about what I said, but it is what it is.
If you don't like it that Peter declared the Law of Moses the burden they and their forefathers could not bear, then take that up with him.
Peter didn't direct the Gentiles away from Moses, he just turned them away from the white washed walls who claimed to be from Moses. He actually gave them some Laws of Moses to follow, knowing that they would learn "instruction in righteousness", not from the mainstream preachers of the land, but from the mouth of Moses himself, read every Sabbath. That is why he and James directed the New Converts to hear Moses, which was also a directive Jesus gave to them.
My Agenda is to address your religious philosophy that ignores and hides from these truths, in order to diminish the God of the Bible. Peter did not do or teach such things.
Acts 5:
29 Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
Of course, you must bury these Word's as they don't promote your own religious philosophy.
Acts 5:
32 And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.
This of course would explain why Peter and James sent the New Converts to hear from Moses, and away from the mainstream religious men of his time. Because Peter believed Jesus, he knew these men "said", but did not do. And that their religious philosophy had led God's People astray, not God as you preach to the world.
What is your agenda? Why would you pick one sentence from Peter, take it out of context, ignore the rest of his Spirit inspired teaching, and build an entire religious philosophy around it?
I have asked this before but you can't even discuss it. How were God's Laws a Yoke of Bondage that Caleb or Joshua or Gideon or David or Zacharias, or Simeon, or Anna couldn't bear? Why is it necessary for me to erase so much of God's Words to be in agreement of your religious philosophy?
They learned the hard way that they could not live the Law perfectly. If they had, then why the sin sacrifices, peace offerings, etc.? You really need to do a reality check.
I'm not interested in your mainstream religious reality. I am interested in seeking the Kingdom of God and HIS Righteousness. That is why I believe "ALL" that is written for my admonition, not just the few scriptures which can twisted to prop up a religious philosophy which implies that God's Laws brought Israel down, not their own stubborn, selfish stiff necked ways.
God provided atonement for His People because HE Loves them, and wishes all to be saved. He gave His only Son to die so I would have another chance to choose, and choose HIM this time around. Why are you so against these truths?
[Mat 19:17-21 KJV] 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. 18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, 19 Honour thy father and [thy] mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. [NOTICE JESUS DID NOT SAY ALL THE LAW OF MOSES.] 20 The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? 21 Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go [and] sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come [and] follow me.
Did you get that? The last item is/was not in the Law of Moses. Only God is good, and the boy says, "Me too! Been that way since I was a young boy." Rather than to argue with the boy, the Lord laid down one more item not even in the Law of Moses, and here you are pretending that the Law of Moses is something that must be adhered to in addition to what is actually the finished work of the cross. Your gospel is a false one! Does it not stand that your gospel brings about only the condemnation Paul spoke of for being accursed?
Jesus didn't call it the Law of Moses, because it was God's Law, not Moses as you are constantly preaching as though Moses created his own laws. He also didn't tell the man to Love God with all his heart, and love thy neighbor as thyself. But even a child, if you were to be honest, would have no doubt about "WHICH" Law Jesus said to Follow to inherit Life.
It is true this man had been convinced he was already saved by the mainstream preachers of his time, as he claimed obedience to God as did the Pharisees in Acts 15. But Jesus knew he placed his religion above the God of the Bible. He was in violation of the First Commandment.
Ex. 20:
2 I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
So your preaching that Jesus was promoting Laws not given by God to Moses is again, False.
Of course in your religious philosophy Jesus was lying to this man, as you preach these same Laws He told the crowd to follow, are the same Laws you preach to the world are the Yoke of Bondage that Israel couldn't bear.
If the Law of Moses were still required upon us, what purpose did it serve for Jesus to fulfill it? You don't even understand the meaning of that word "fulfill", as is evident in your continued copy and past of all that stuff you post. There's no substance behind your religion.
I know for certain that "Fulfill" and "Destroy" have opposite definitions in the context Jesus used them. But you preach they mean the same.
Jesus became my High Priest as Prophesied throughout the Law and Prophets, did HE Fulfill these Prophesies regarding HIMSELF? Sure He did. He also "Became obedient unto death" or as HE says in another place "Endured to the end", and instructed me to do the same.
Your hatred and enmity against God's Laws is common, especially among religious men and Paul warned about it. There is a cost in this life for following the Christ of the Bible, there is no cost in this life in following the religious philosophies and doctrines of men.
The boy was asking about what it would take to have eternal life, and he was told to go and do something that was not even commanded in the Law of Moses.
Jr
Placing religions, family, money, fame, pride, selfishness
above the Word of God is one of the very pillars of God's Law given to Moses. For you to preach otherwise is just more proof of how out of touch you really are regarding the "Righteousness of God.
Paul describes this man perfectly in Rom. 10.
Rom. 10:
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
God's Law, as inspired by the Spirit of the Christ Himself in David, is God's Righteousness.
Ps. 119:
172 My tongue shall speak of thy word: for all thy commandments are righteousness. 173 Let thine hand help me; for I have chosen thy precepts. 174 I have longed for thy salvation, O LORD; and thy law is my delight.
Given that you preach to the world that God's Law David Cherished is the Yoke of Bondage that Israel couldn't bear, it is obvious that you are ignorant of God's Righteousness and are going about to establish your own.
Jesus didn't direct the guy in the scripture you referenced to "establish his own righteousness" as you do, Jesus directed this man to "submit himself to the righteousness of God". The same "righteousness" you preach is a Yoke of Bondage Caleb and Joshua and Zacharias couldn't bear.
You will never find a place where Jesus is directing His People to ignore the instructions from God. The serpent? Yes! satan? Yes! Religious men? Yes! But not Jesus.
What if HE is actually telling the truth. You might want to consider this possibility.