want to talk about OSAS?

Are you an OSAS believer?

  • yes

    Votes: 27 43.5%
  • no

    Votes: 32 51.6%
  • of course

    Votes: 3 4.8%

  • Total voters
    62

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Those who produce no results at all, but instead fall away before faith is firmly rooted and established were not truly converted

Made up.

The seeds that fell on rocky ground stand for those who hear the message and receive it gladly.

They received the message, or accepted it.

they believe only for a while but when the time of testing comes, they fall away.

IOW, albeit they believed for only a short while, they believed nonetheless, but when the time of testing comes, they fall away. "Fell away" from What? Their belief.

There is no scriptual evidence the believer in question was not saved/converted and your conclusion (all you own words there with no scripture saying it is a fact) is just you saying he wasn't saved because vou need that to be a fact in order to keep OSAS alive.

It is not a fact, and OSAS is dead.

What was it again that beleiver "fell away" from if it wasn't this belief in the word/his salvation?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: 1an
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is what I mean by you interjecting your own conclusion/opinion when the bible says no such thing, then concluding it a fact. You have no idea if there was no fruit produced or not, and many, if not most, start out with a shallow belief and it grows.

In short, you are basically making up much of your so-called factual claims.
Interjecting my own conclusion/opinion, huh? Matthew 13:5 - Some fell on rocky places, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly, because the soil was shallow. (the plant sprang up, yet no fruit sprang up. The plant was scorched and withered away before reaching it's goal of being firmly rooted and established, which explains why there was no fruit). 6 But when the sun came up, the plants were scorched, and they withered because they had no root.

Yet you say there may have been fruit? o_O Yeah right! So where is it? *Only the 4th soil (good ground) is said to have produced a crop of various sizes.

Mark 4:5 - Other seed fell on the rocky ground where it did not have much soil; and immediately it sprang up because it had no depth of soil. 6 And after the sun had risen, it was scorched; and because it had no root, it withered away.

Luke 8:6 - Other seed fell on rocky soil, and as soon as it grew up, it withered away, because it had no moisture.

So there you have it straight from scripture, which is not simply my opinion. ;) *Shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces no fruit, lacks moisture and withers away DOES NOT REPRESENT SAVING BELIEF. Period.
 
Upvote 0

1an

Newbie
Dec 4, 2011
1,528
182
✟48,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Interjecting my own conclusion/opinion, huh? Matthew 13:5 - Some fell on rocky places, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly, because the soil was shallow. (the plant sprang up, yet no fruit sprang up. The plant was scorched and withered away before reaching it's goal of being firmly rooted and established, which explains why there was no fruit). 6 But when the sun came up, the plants were scorched, and they withered because they had no root.

Yet you say there may have been fruit? o_O Yeah right! So where is it? *Only the 4th soil (good ground) is said to have produced a crop of various sizes.

Mark 4:5 - Other seed fell on the rocky ground where it did not have much soil; and immediately it sprang up because it had no depth of soil. 6 And after the sun had risen, it was scorched; and because it had no root, it withered away.

Luke 8:6 - Other seed fell on rocky soil, and as soon as it grew up, it withered away, because it had no moisture.

So there you have it straight from scripture, which is not simply my opinion. ;) *Shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces no fruit, lacks moisture and withers away DOES NOT REPRESENT SAVING BELIEF. Period.
I have seen you speak of the nominal Christian, so are you saying a nominal Christian is not a Christian?
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You cannot compare demons with believing church goers, that is so silly.
James compared those who believe "there is one God" with the demons who believe that as well. You can go to church and believe a lot of things, yet if your belief falls short of trusting in Jesus Christ alone for salvation, then you are not saved.

So in James 2:19, we see that the demons believe "mental assent" that "there is one God" but the demons do not believe in/have faith in/trust in/reliance in Jesus Christ for salvation. In other words, the demons do not believe in the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31) and are not saved.

Their trust and reliance is in Satan (and not in Jesus) as demonstrated by their rebellion in heaven and continuous evil works.
 
Upvote 0

1an

Newbie
Dec 4, 2011
1,528
182
✟48,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
James compared those who believe "there is one God" with the demons who believe that as well. You can go to church and believe a lot of things, yet if your belief falls short of trusting in Jesus Christ alone for salvation, then you are not saved.

So in James 2:19, we see that the demons believe "mental assent" that "there is one God" but the demons do not believe in/have faith in/trust in/reliance in Jesus Christ for salvation. In other words, the demons do not believe in the Lord Jesus Christ (Acts 16:31) and are not saved.

Their trust and reliance is in Satan (and not in Jesus) as demonstrated by their rebellion in heaven and continuous evil works.
If demons do not believe in Jesus why were they frightened of him?
.
 
Upvote 0

RickReads

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2020
3,433
1,068
59
richmond
✟64,831.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
In my own words, The elect of God have been chosen or predestined to serve Him. People are not elected at the beginning of time for salvation, but to serve God by fulfilling His predestined plan and purpose down the ages. Among the elect of God were Moses and Judas. They need to be the right person and in the right place, so that God's plan and purpose will be fulfilled here on earth. Mary the mother of Jesus was another, and dare I say it, Rahab the harlot. They are not necessarily elected of God for salvation, but to do His bidding. (Ian)

"According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love." (Eph. 1:4)

The New Testament words "chosen, choose, and election" are the same. The Old Testament word is simply "chosen." From the above Scripture many have felt that God chooses some to be saved and some to be lost. Again I want to point out that predestination and election (choosing) have nothing to do with the lost, but are for the saved.

From the following Scriptures we learn what the choosing, or election, of God is about:'' For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son. And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, THAT THE PURPOSE OF GOD ACCORDING TO ELECTION MIGHT STAND, not of works, but of him that calleth); It was said unto her, THE ELDER SHALL SERVE THE YOUNGER. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated." (Rom. 9:9-13).

At once we point out that election, or choosing, has to do with service; THE ELDER SHALL SERVE THE YOUNGER. It does not say, "The younger shall be saved, and the elder shall be lost." No, but simply, "the elder shall SERVE the younger." Thus choosing, or election, has to do with service. "Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated" wasn't said of these two men before they were born, but hundreds of years after they died.

God hated the descendants of Esau because of their unbelief, and loved the descendants of Jacob because of their faith.

In the 15th chapter of John's Gospel, the Lord Jesus said that He had chosen (elected) them disciples. For salvation? No, for service. Even Judas was chosen! For damnation? No, but like Pharoh, who was a fit vessel unto wrath - after being given many chances to believe, refused, and thus was used for God's purpose.

The prophet Isaiah says that Israel is God's chosen people (Isaiah 41:8). Does this mean that all Jews are saved? No. It simply means that God has chosen Israel for a service. And we know what that service was: to give us the Word of God and to give us the Lord Jesus Christ!

The same prophet, Isaiah, says that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Chosen Servant of God (Isaiah 42:1). Does this mean that God chose the Lord Jesus to be saved? Of course not! For He is the SAVIOUR! But God did choose His Son for a service - and that service was to be the Lamb of God who would die for the sins of the world. And He was the obedient Servant, being obedient unto death, even the death of the Cross!

Now back to the original text, as found in Ephesians 1:4. What has God elected or chosen us for? He has chosen us for service - "that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love."

Thus, we conclude that God does not predestinate or elect men to be saved or lost, but that salvation is on the basis of "WHOSOEVER WILL!"- "And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth, say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And WHOSOEVER WILL, let him take the water of life freely." (Rev. 22:17).

by Dr. Mark G. Cambron,
Seaside Mission,
North Miami Beach, Florida
.

Interesting theory but easily disproved.

"And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other."

All those who take part in the first resurrection are elect.

Here`s another -> "Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth."

This verse shows us that whosoever will is the one that He wills (aka the elect).
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Made up.

There is no scriptual evidence the believer in question was not saved/converted and your conclusion (all you own words there with no scripture saying it is a fact) is just you saying he wasn't saved because vou need that to be a fact in order to keep OSAS alive.
I clearly proved my points from scripture, but you stubbornly refuse to accept the truth because of your disdain towards OSAS. Your bias is showing.

It is not a fact, and OSAS is dead.
OSAS is very much alive. Prior to my conversion while still attending the Roman Catholic church, I did not believe in OSAS either because I believed that salvation was obtained and maintained based on the merits of my performance/works and I lived in fear and bondage to IN-security and was miserable! After my conversion, I was set free from my lost condition of trusting in works for salvation instead of in Christ alone and also from fear and bondage to IN-security. Praise God!

What was it again that beleiver "fell away" from?
From a shallow, temporary belief that had no root. Just because the seed fell short of being firmly rooted and established does not mean that this shallow ground hearer did not fall away from anything at all. There was an emotional response, but no conversion. No response at all to the word would give him nothing to fall away from, like the seed that fell by the wayside.
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So the old lady who goes to to church week by week, is not a Christian because she does not produce 'works.'
If someone claims to have faith, but produces no works at all (James 2:14) would you call that living faith or dead faith?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

1an

Newbie
Dec 4, 2011
1,528
182
✟48,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Interesting theory but easily disproved.

"And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other."

All those who take part in the first resurrection are elect.

Here`s another -> "Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth."

This verse shows us that whosoever will is the one that He wills (aka the elect).
So...?
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If someone claims to have faith, but produces no works at all (James 2:14) would you call that living faith or dead faith?

How do you know he produced no works? You keep adding that in with no proof it is a fact.

And again, what did he "fall away" from?
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hbr 6:4 - "It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace."

We know the faithful are secure. The problem is when people say "You cannot loose your salvation."

O' well people will find out one day. In the old days it was fire and brimstone, now it is fluffy cotton wool.

There are many more similar scriptures.
It's actually "lose" and not "loose" your salvation. BTW I'm still looking for that exact phrase in the Bible. I commonly hear three different interpretations for Hebrews 6:4-6 (hypothetical view, lost salvation view, never truly saved view) but am not convinced that it "unequivocally" teaches a really "saved" person truly "lost their salvation." According to the hypothetical interpretation, the key word in the passage is IF (verse 6). According to this view, the writer of Hebrews is setting up a hypothetical statement, "IF a Christian were to fall away." The point being made is that it would be impossible if a Christian fell away to renew them again. That’s because Christ died once for sin and if His sacrifice is insufficient, then there’s no hope at all. The passage then presents an argument based on a false premise (that a true Christian can permanently fall away) and follows it to its senseless conclusion that they would crucify again for themselves the Son of God.

In regards to the never truly saved view, the words, once enlightened - which means to bring to light, to shed light upon or to cause light to shine upon some object, in the sense of illuminating it. John 1:9 describes Jesus, the "true Light," giving light "to every man," but this cannot mean the light of salvation, because not every man is saved. The light either leads to the complete acceptance of Jesus Christ or produces condemnation in those who reject the light.

In regards to partakers of the Holy Spirit, the word translated “partaker” can certainly refer to a saving partaking in Christ, as we read in Hebrews 3:14, yet it can also refer to a less than saving association or participation. See Luke 5:7 and Hebrews 1:9 - "comrades, companions," which describes one who shares with someone else as an associate in an undertaking. These Hebrews who fell away had obviously in some aspect shared in the ministry of the Holy Spirit, but in what way? There are other ministries of the Holy Spirit which precede receiving the indwelling and sealing of the Holy Spirit, which only genuine believers receive..

Those who fall away absolutely could have been affiliated closely with the fellowship of the church. Such people certainly may have experienced sorrow for sin, heard and understood the gospel and have given some assent to it and have become associated with the work of the Holy Spirit while around believers and have tasted the heavenly gift and the powers of the age to come. They may have been exposed to the true preaching of the word of God, yet have simply tasted and stopped there. People who have experienced these factors may be genuine Christians, yet these factors alone are not enough to give conclusive evidence that the beginning stages of the Christian life (repentance unto life, regeneration, salvation, justification, adoption etc..) have taken place for those who fell away. The experiences in Hebrews 6:4-6 are all preliminary to those decisive beginning stages of becoming a Christian, yet some draw back to perdition after receiving the 'knowledge' of the truth and do not believe to the saving of the soul, as we see in (Hebrews 10:26-39)

These certain individuals who fall short of obtaining salvation certainly may have become partakers of the Holy Spirit in his pre-salvation ministry, convicting of sin and righteousness and judgment to come by tasting the good word of God and temporarily responded to His drawing power which is intended to ultimately lead unbelievers to Christ, yet the writer of Hebrews does not use conclusive terms that these individuals were "indwelled by the Holy Spirit" or "sealed by the Holy Spirit" which is the guarantee of future inheritance. Genuine believers who have believed the gospel are sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession/unto the day of redemption. (Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30)

In regards to tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, they may have tasted in such a way as to give them a distinct impression of what was tasted, yet they still fell away. Inherent in the idea of tasting is the fact that one might or might not decide to accept what is tasted. For example, the same Greek word (geuomai) is used in Matthew 27:34 to say that those crucifying Jesus "offered him wine to drink, mingled with gall; but when he tasted it, he would not drink it." Do we simply "taste" into one Spirit or drink into one Spirit? (1 Corinthians 12:13).

In regards to renew them again unto repentance, this does not specify whether the repentance was merely outward or genuine accompanied by saving faith. They have in some sense "repented," there may be sorrow for sins and an attempt to turn from them (moral self-reformation) that non-believers can experience. There is repentance that falls short of salvation, which is clear from Hebrews 12:7 and the reference to Esau, as well as the repentance of Judas Iscariot in Matthew 27:3. Paul refers to a repentance “without regret that leads to salvation,” which shows there is a repentance that does not lead to salvation. As with “belief/faith”, so too with “repentance,” we must always distinguish between what is substantial and results in salvation and what is spurious. Renew them again "unto salvation" would be conclusive evidence for your argument.

In Hebrews 6:7-8, we read - For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; but if it bears thorns and briars, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned. In this metaphor relating to agriculture, those who receive final judgment are compared to land that bears no vegetation or useful fruit, but rather bears thorns and thistles. We read in scripture that good fruit is a sign of true spiritual life and a lack of good fruit is a sign of false believers (Matthew 3:8-10; 7:15-20; 12:33-35) so we have an indication that the evidence of one's spiritual condition is the fruit they bear, suggesting that the writer of Hebrews is talking about people who are not genuine believers.

*Verse 9 sums it up for me. The writer is speaking to those truly saved (refers to them as BELOVED). He says that even though he speaks like this concerning THOSE types of people, He is convinced of better things concerning YOU. Things that ACCOMPANY SALVATION. Thorns and briars and falling away permanently do not accompany salvation and is not the fruit of authentic repentance.

It's generally stated by those who believe that salvation can be lost that it can be regained again, yet that would not be the case here if the writer of Hebrews was teaching a loss of salvation. I have heard certain individuals state they know someone who was truly saved, but later lost their salvation, yet only God truly knows the heart of individuals. Certain people "on the surface" may do a good job of looking like the real deal for a while (like Judas Iscariot, who was an unbelieving, unclean devil who betrayed Jesus - John 6:64-71; 13:10-11) yet to the other 11 disciples, he looked like the real deal, but Jesus knew his heart. There are genuine Christians and there are "nominal" Christians. There are genuine believers and there are make believers.
 
Upvote 0

1an

Newbie
Dec 4, 2011
1,528
182
✟48,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
How do you know he produced no works? You keep adding that in with no proof it is a fact.

And again, what did he "fall away" from?
I would like to know what works these people produce. The things they say are enough to put me off Christians and Christianity forever.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

1an

Newbie
Dec 4, 2011
1,528
182
✟48,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
It's actually "lose" and not "loose" your salvation. BTW I'm still looking for that exact phrase in the Bible. I commonly hear three different interpretations for Hebrews 6:4-6 (hypothetical view, lost salvation view, never truly saved view) but am not convinced that it "unequivocally" teaches a really "saved" person truly "lost their salvation." According to the hypothetical interpretation, the key word in the passage is IF (verse 6). According to this view, the writer of Hebrews is setting up a hypothetical statement, "IF a Christian were to fall away." The point being made is that it would be impossible if a Christian fell away to renew them again. That’s because Christ died once for sin and if His sacrifice is insufficient, then there’s no hope at all. The passage then presents an argument based on a false premise (that a true Christian can permanently fall away) and follows it to its senseless conclusion that they would crucify again for themselves the Son of God.

In regards to the never truly saved view, the words, once enlightened - which means to bring to light, to shed light upon or to cause light to shine upon some object, in the sense of illuminating it. John 1:9 describes Jesus, the "true Light," giving light "to every man," but this cannot mean the light of salvation, because not every man is saved. The light either leads to the complete acceptance of Jesus Christ or produces condemnation in those who reject the light.

In regards to partakers of the Holy Spirit, the word translated “partaker” can certainly refer to a saving partaking in Christ, as we read in Hebrews 3:14, yet it can also refer to a less than saving association or participation. See Luke 5:7 and Hebrews 1:9 - "comrades, companions," which describes one who shares with someone else as an associate in an undertaking. These Hebrews who fell away had obviously in some aspect shared in the ministry of the Holy Spirit, but in what way? There are other ministries of the Holy Spirit which precede receiving the indwelling and sealing of the Holy Spirit, which only genuine believers receive..

Those who fall away absolutely could have been affiliated closely with the fellowship of the church. Such people certainly may have experienced sorrow for sin, heard and understood the gospel and have given some assent to it and have become associated with the work of the Holy Spirit while around believers and have tasted the heavenly gift and the powers of the age to come. They may have been exposed to the true preaching of the word of God, yet have simply tasted and stopped there. People who have experienced these factors may be genuine Christians, yet these factors alone are not enough to give conclusive evidence that the beginning stages of the Christian life (repentance unto life, regeneration, salvation, justification, adoption etc..) have taken place for those who fell away. The experiences in Hebrews 6:4-6 are all preliminary to those decisive beginning stages of becoming a Christian, yet some draw back to perdition after receiving the 'knowledge' of the truth and do not believe to the saving of the soul, as we see in (Hebrews 10:26-39)

These certain individuals who fall short of obtaining salvation certainly may have become partakers of the Holy Spirit in his pre-salvation ministry, convicting of sin and righteousness and judgment to come by tasting the good word of God and temporarily responded to His drawing power which is intended to ultimately lead unbelievers to Christ, yet the writer of Hebrews does not use conclusive terms that these individuals were "indwelled by the Holy Spirit" or "sealed by the Holy Spirit" which is the guarantee of future inheritance. Genuine believers who have believed the gospel are sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession/unto the day of redemption. (Ephesians 1:13-14; 4:30)

In regards to tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, they may have tasted in such a way as to give them a distinct impression of what was tasted, yet they still fell away. Inherent in the idea of tasting is the fact that one might or might not decide to accept what is tasted. For example, the same Greek word (geuomai) is used in Matthew 27:34 to say that those crucifying Jesus "offered him wine to drink, mingled with gall; but when he tasted it, he would not drink it." Do we simply "taste" into one Spirit or drink into one Spirit? (1 Corinthians 12:13).

In regards to renew them again unto repentance, this does not specify whether the repentance was merely outward or genuine accompanied by saving faith. They have in some sense "repented," there may be sorrow for sins and an attempt to turn from them (moral self-reformation) that non-believers can experience. There is repentance that falls short of salvation, which is clear from Hebrews 12:7 and the reference to Esau, as well as the repentance of Judas Iscariot in Matthew 27:3. Paul refers to a repentance “without regret that leads to salvation,” which shows there is a repentance that does not lead to salvation. As with “belief/faith”, so too with “repentance,” we must always distinguish between what is substantial and results in salvation and what is spurious. Renew them again "unto salvation" would be conclusive evidence for your argument.

In Hebrews 6:7-8, we read - For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; but if it bears thorns and briars, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned. In this metaphor relating to agriculture, those who receive final judgment are compared to land that bears no vegetation or useful fruit, but rather bears thorns and thistles. We read in scripture that good fruit is a sign of true spiritual life and a lack of good fruit is a sign of false believers (Matthew 3:8-10; 7:15-20; 12:33-35) so we have an indication that the evidence of one's spiritual condition is the fruit they bear, suggesting that the writer of Hebrews is talking about people who are not genuine believers.

*Verse 9 sums it up for me. The writer is speaking to those truly saved (refers to them as BELOVED). He says that even though he speaks like this concerning THOSE types of people, He is convinced of better things concerning YOU. Things that ACCOMPANY SALVATION. Thorns and briars and falling away permanently do not accompany salvation and is not the fruit of authentic repentance.

It's generally stated by those who believe that salvation can be lost that it can be regained again, yet that would not be the case here if the writer of Hebrews was teaching a loss of salvation. I have heard certain individuals state they know someone who was truly saved, but later lost their salvation, yet only God truly knows the heart of individuals. Certain people "on the surface" may do a good job of looking like the real deal for a while (like Judas Iscariot, who was an unbelieving, unclean devil who betrayed Jesus - John 6:64-71; 13:10-11) yet to the other 11 disciples, he looked like the real deal, but Jesus knew his heart. There are genuine Christians and there are "nominal" Christians. There are genuine believers and there are make believers.
I'm not interested in anything you have to say, I am going to have to put you on ignore, but before I do please tell me, what works you produce other than verbosity.
.
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I proved otherwise from scripture, but you have closed your eyes to the truth.

The seeds that fell on rocky ground stand for those who hear the message and receive it gladly.

They received the message, or accepted it.

they believe only for a while but when the time of testing comes, they fall away.

IOW, albeit they believed for only a short while, they believed nonetheless, but when the time of testing comes, they fall away. "Fell away" from What? Their belief.
They received it gladly (emotional response) and believed (in a shallow way) and fell away from their shallow, temporary belief that had no root, produce no fruit, lack moisture and withered away. Only the seed that fell on the 4th soil was said to be good ground and produced a crop. That represents saving belief.

There is no scriptual evidence the believer in question was not saved/converted and your conclusion (all you own words there with no scripture saying it is a fact) is just you saying he wasn't saved because vou need that to be a fact in order to keep OSAS alive.
Actually, there is no scriptural evidence that this shallow believer was saved/converted and your conclusion that he was saved is based on your anti-OSAS bias.

It is not a fact, and OSAS is dead.
You may fool yourself, but you are not fooling me.

What was it again that beleiver "fell away" from if it wasn't this belief in the word/his salvation?
I already told you. Falling away from a shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces no fruit, lacks moisture and withers away is not falling away from salvation. Do you even understand what it truly means to believe "unto salvation?"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
3,702
2,813
Midwest
✟304,979.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not interested in anything you have to say, I am going to have to put you on ignore, but before I do please tell me, what works you produce other than verbosity.
I see that you have also closed your eyes to the truth. Feel free to place me on ignore if you wish.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Still no proof this "believer" had no works.

And it seems I recall Danthemailman has always touted we don't need works to be saved. Please correct me on that if I have it wrong.

And I'm just not getting anything substantial from Danthemailman on what exactly this believer fell away from.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
already told you. Falling away from a shallow, temporary belief that has no root, produces no fruit, lacks moisture and withers away is not falling away from salvation. Do you even understand what it

if he fell away from a shallow belief, that would mean he no longer had a shallow belief, so, dude, that makes no sense at all.

They received it gladly (emotional response) and believed (in a shallow way) and fell away from their shallow, temporary belief that had no root, produce no fruit, lack moisture and withered away. Only the seed that fell on the 4th soil was said to be good ground and produced a crop. That represents saving belief.

You added so much there that the bible simply does not say. Please stop doing that and calling it fact.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0