Texas Social Worker Code Update

NerdGirl

The untamed daughter
Apr 14, 2020
2,651
3,104
USA
✟65,654.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Texas Administrative Code

I'm seeing absolute hysteria from the liberal media over this decision. This portion of the code is the cause of contention:
" (1) A social worker shall not refuse to perform any act or service for which the person is licensed solely on the basis of a client's age; gender; race; color; religion; national origin; disability; sexual orientation; gender identity and expression; or political affiliation."

In summary, the code is being amended to remove the terms "disability", "sexual orientation" and "gender identity and expression". The latter two will be replaced with simply the term "sex", from what I understand. The reason stated by Governor Abbott is that these comprise "extra" protections that aren't necessary, since the rest of the Code and the existing state laws already provide protections for all citizens.

Of course, most of the articles about this are simply screaming things like, "Texas Social Workers Can Now Turn Away Disabled and LGBT Clients". No, they can't. These populations are still protected under existing law. There is not going to be a single social worker who denies someone Medicaid or food benefits because they're gay or in a wheelchair.

As someone who's worked for my own state's Department of Health & Social Services for the past 16 years, I'm genuinely curious what sort of scenario these media outlets and pro-LGBT groups are envisioning. Throngs of disabled people banging on the doors of social service offices and being told, "Nope, sorry, you're disabled"? A gay client being denied Medicaid simply for being gay? That doesn't happen. It's not going to happen. The backlash for any social worker who would even dare do such a thing would be severe. Not only would that be fuel for lawsuits, but they'd almost certainly lose their job.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Darkhorse

Darkhorse

just horsing around
Aug 10, 2005
10,078
3,977
mid-Atlantic
Visit site
✟288,141.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don't know the details, but they may have an issue with this change possibly conflicting with the ADA. Of course, I don't expect any of these people you mentioned to go without services...
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
145,016
17,404
USA
✟1,749,784.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
There should be an actual news article in the OP.


New Texas rule lets social workers turn away clients who are LGBTQ or have a disability

Texas social workers are criticizing a state regulatory board’s decision this week to remove protections for LGBTQ clients and clients with disabilities who seek social work services.

The Texas State Board of Social Work Examiners voted unanimously Monday to change a section of its code of conduct that establishes when a social worker may refuse to serve someone. The code will no longer prohibit social workers from turning away clients on the basis of disability, sexual orientation or gender identity......

“There’s now a gray area between what’s legally allowed and ethically responsible,” he said. “The law should never allow a social worker to legally do unethical things.”

The Republican-led Texas Legislature has long opposed expanding nondiscrimination protections to LGBTQ Texans in employment, housing and other areas of state law.

There will be court cases, eventually.


 
Upvote 0

grandvizier1006

I don't use this anymore, but I still follow Jesus
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2014
5,976
2,599
28
MS
✟664,118.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The way I see it, each side of the political aisle has bogeymen they’re afraid of that the other side “could” do, but probably won’t actually do, at least not in large numbers. This is one of the left’s.
 
Upvote 0

Redwingfan9

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2019
2,629
1,532
Midwest
✟70,636.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Texas Administrative Code

I'm seeing absolute hysteria from the liberal media over this decision. This portion of the code is the cause of contention:
" (1) A social worker shall not refuse to perform any act or service for which the person is licensed solely on the basis of a client's age; gender; race; color; religion; national origin; disability; sexual orientation; gender identity and expression; or political affiliation."

In summary, the code is being amended to remove the terms "disability", "sexual orientation" and "gender identity and expression". The latter two will be replaced with simply the term "sex", from what I understand. The reason stated by Governor Abbott is that these comprise "extra" protections that aren't necessary, since the rest of the Code and the existing state laws already provide protections for all citizens.

Of course, most of the articles about this are simply screaming things like, "Texas Social Workers Can Now Turn Away Disabled and LGBT Clients". No, they can't. These populations are still protected under existing law. There is not going to be a single social worker who denies someone Medicaid or food benefits because they're gay or in a wheelchair.

As someone who's worked for my own state's Department of Health & Social Services for the past 16 years, I'm genuinely curious what sort of scenario these media outlets and pro-LGBT groups are envisioning. Throngs of disabled people banging on the doors of social service offices and being told, "Nope, sorry, you're disabled"? A gay client being denied Medicaid simply for being gay? That doesn't happen. It's not going to happen. The backlash for any social worker who would even dare do such a thing would be severe. Not only would that be fuel for lawsuits, but they'd almost certainly lose their job.
Based on the Supreme Courts recent expansion of the definition of sex, I'm not sure what Texas expects this change to accomplish.
 
Upvote 0