iamlamad
Lamad
- Jun 8, 2013
- 9,620
- 744
- 78
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
I have said so many times, right? I haven't changed my mind on that. So, yes, you're right.
Yes, I'm tracking with you so far, but I'm sure you are going to go off the rails at some point here since I know where you're heading with this.
Sure. I can sense you getting to your main point any time now.
You don't have to say please. The answer is obviously no. Only Christ's blood of the new covenant can permanently remove the sins of any person who has ever lived. He died for the sins of all people throughout history.
Yes. So, what is your point? With all that in mind why would animal sacrifices be necessary in the future? Remember...
Hebrews 10:1 The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming—not the realities themselves. For this reason it can never, by the same sacrifices repeated endlessly year after year, make perfect those who draw near to worship.
The OT animal sacrifices were ONLY meant to be a foreshadowing of Christ's sacrifice. So, they served their purpose. For what possible reason would they be reinstituted to atone for people's sins even in the sense that they did in OT times? Please do not say they would be done in remembrance of Christ when the prophecy says no such thing and instead says they would be for the atoning of sins.
Why revert back to the ways of the inferior old covenant? That would imply that the new covenant of Christ's shed blood will somehow not be sufficient at that point. What a terrible thought!
If they were not REAL and did not remove sin the first time, they why could they not be reinstated again as NOT REAL, but pointing BACK in time to what Jesus did - as a reminder?
It is all guessing because it is not written. I promise, I am done with this subject!
Upvote
0