House votes 397-5 for resolution affirming a peaceful transfer of power

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
11,157
7,518
✟347,081.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
No hair splitting... "a Republic if you can keep it" -- Ben Franklin

... but let's not get off topic.
And how are decisions made in this Republic? And how are the leaders selected? I'll give you a hint. It starts with a d.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,286
8,141
US
✟1,098,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Goodness gracious! Instead of complaining that you don’t know what happened, why don’t you go find out?

No complaints. I just thought that it might be appropriate to investigate the facts before assembling a lynch mob.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,238
36,553
Los Angeles Area
✟829,299.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
No complaints. I just thought that it might be appropriate to investigate the facts before assembling a lynch mob.

Can I get my pitchfork now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,732
7,790
43
New Jersey
✟203,465.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Trump said, "let's wait and see what happens." There are 100's of thousands of mail-in ballots floating around encouraging voter fraud.

People have already reported being sent multiple ballots. It has been reported a few days ago that ballots from the military were found in the trash, they were votes for Trump.

If Biden wins and voter fraud is evident, Trump will not leave office, and I don't blame him.

Then the SC will decide.
You mean the SC he is stacking with a nakedly partisan judge? Gee, how could that go wrong.

Sending out multiple ballots means nothing. I got 3 for the primary. You only send one back, or they get tossed. Just like in person voting. Try to vote more than once, you get arrested, it isn't hard.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,581
10,418
Earth
✟142,361.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
This doesn't explain the motivation for suspending the rules in this case.

Who made a motion to suspend the rules; and what statements preceded that motion to prompt that motion?

Look, you seem new to forum 909, but the whole “but my questions are not being answered to my satisfaction” trope gets old quick.

From the Wikipedia article that you seemed to not read:
A motion to suspend the rules is in order on Mondays and Tuesdays and towards the end of a session of Congress and may only be made by the Speaker of the House or their designee, though it is customary for committee chairs to write the Speaker requesting a suspension“.

Nearly everyone was in favor, the “suspend the rules and pass” was initiated by the Speaker or her designee and then, (one guesses), one of the five eventual “nays” requests a recorded vote, otherwise it’d’ve been recorded as “passed via unanimous-consent”.

“Who made the “suspend the rules and pass” in this particular case?
Don’t know.
If it’s really important to you, go find it yourself.
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
11,157
7,518
✟347,081.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Isn't this bicameral legislation the President is supposed to SIGN? Did he sign it? I have a feeling I already know the answer.
No it's not. These were two separate resolutions, not even a concurrent resolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
14,929
11,919
54
USA
✟299,691.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
There were 45 minutes of debate on this resolution. I wonder what was said, if anything was added or subtracted from the original resolution; and I wonder why the rules were suspended to push this resolution through.

The video of the debate can be found at:

House Session, Part 1 | C-SPAN.org

Starting at 5:02:18

Because it was considered under a suspension of the rules, there are no amendments permitted.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: HARK!
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,286
8,141
US
✟1,098,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
The video of the debate can be found at:

House Session, Part 1 | C-SPAN.org

Starting at 5:02:18

Because it was considered under a suspension of the rules, there are no amendments permitted.

I believe I see now why some voted Nay. The vote was to suspend the rules, prohibit amendments, and to pass this resolution.

Still it not as bad as having to pass it; before you can find out what's in it.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
16,581
10,418
Earth
✟142,361.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I believe I see now why some voted Nay. The vote was to suspend the rules, prohibit amendments, and to pass this resolution.

Still it not as bad as having to pass it; before you can find out what's in it.
C-SPAN said:
The House considered more than 20 bills under suspension of the rules, including one reaffirming the House of Representative’s commitment to the orderly and peaceful transfer of power called for in the Constitution. The Senate the previous week passed a similar resolution by unanimous consent.
So a resolution that passed Mitch McConnell’s Senate by “unanimous consent”, and is not “controversial”, (obviously since it passed 397-5), that the House “reaffirms” the “peaceful transfer of power” as prescribed in the constitution that was just one of 20 bills that were under “suspend the rules and pass”.

But be my guest to try to make this more sinister than it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,238
36,553
Los Angeles Area
✟829,299.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
The five Republicans who voted against the resolution were Reps. Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Louie Gohmert(Texas), Clay Higgins (La.), Steve King (Iowa) and Thomas Massie (Ky.).

@RepClayHiggins Oct 23
My wife has the gift of premonition. Last night she dreamed that Federal squads were in our home seizing guns, knives, “unauthorized foods” and stored water. They said we had been “reported”. Becca awoke crying. What happened to our freedom? She asked. What indeed.

This esteemed GOP representative is definitely not planning a peaceful transition of power. To the contrary, he's playing with fire.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0