Goodness gracious! Instead of complaining that you don’t know what happened, why don’t you go find out?
No complaints. I just thought that it might be appropriate to investigate the facts before assembling a lynch mob.
You mean the SC he is stacking with a nakedly partisan judge? Gee, how could that go wrong.Trump said, "let's wait and see what happens." There are 100's of thousands of mail-in ballots floating around encouraging voter fraud.
People have already reported being sent multiple ballots. It has been reported a few days ago that ballots from the military were found in the trash, they were votes for Trump.
If Biden wins and voter fraud is evident, Trump will not leave office, and I don't blame him.
Then the SC will decide.
This doesn't explain the motivation for suspending the rules in this case.
Who made a motion to suspend the rules; and what statements preceded that motion to prompt that motion?
There were 45 minutes of debate on this resolution. I wonder what was said, if anything was added or subtracted from the original resolution; and I wonder why the rules were suspended to push this resolution through.
The video of the debate can be found at:
House Session, Part 1 | C-SPAN.org
Starting at 5:02:18
Because it was considered under a suspension of the rules, there are no amendments permitted.
I believe I see now why some voted Nay. The vote was to suspend the rules, prohibit amendments, and to pass this resolution.
Still it not as bad as having to pass it; before you can find out what's in it.
So a resolution that passed Mitch McConnell’s Senate by “unanimous consent”, and is not “controversial”, (obviously since it passed 397-5), that the House “reaffirms” the “peaceful transfer of power” as prescribed in the constitution that was just one of 20 bills that were under “suspend the rules and pass”.C-SPAN said:The House considered more than 20 bills under suspension of the rules, including one reaffirming the House of Representative’s commitment to the orderly and peaceful transfer of power called for in the Constitution. The Senate the previous week passed a similar resolution by unanimous consent.
The five Republicans who voted against the resolution were Reps. Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Louie Gohmert(Texas), Clay Higgins (La.), Steve King (Iowa) and Thomas Massie (Ky.).