Let's take this for instance (S word removed from quote):
Later that day, Cohen writes, he met up with Trump in his office.
"Can you believe that bulls: Trump said of the laying on of hands. "Can you believe that people believe that bull."
What is he responding to there? The article shows nothing. As far as anyone knows Trump is 100% correct in his acessment.
You say:
there is no other context that can change the conclusion of the article,
Are you kidding!?
You are basically saying context doesn't matter, so between that and the fact the article offers no context at all, hence basically only tells half the story, the article is a complete joke.
Amazing how half a story is all some people need, or better said, all some people "want".