You seem to know things.
You seem to know things.
It should be very easy to prove in a court of law, then.Claiming a $70,000 tax deduction on your hair and over $1 million in charitable "consulting fees" for giving advice to your own daughter is tax evasion, plain and simple. Everybody knows that. At least, for when the person doing it is anyone but Trump.
In a country where a sitting president can't be indicted. But other than that, seems like a perfectly cromulent defense.Especially in a court of law with a 6 to 3 conservative majority.
Does Russian conspiracy ring any bells?Perhaps because Trump really does do bad things?
Have you stopped to consider maybe it is you who are being mislead?
Project much?
Before I would consider anything as close to a fact I would want to see the original tax returns. The NYT has a history of making news rather than reporting news.Not true. Read the NYT article.
You are in your own words imagining. We need the facts not speculation. Especially speculation by people who know nothing about taxes, accelerated depreciation, tax credits, profit and loss statements, cash flow or any of the other facts that would take quite some time to explain to people who are not in business or understand accounting.Good question.
One can easily read about the Trump business holdings. These business rely on customers. And Trump goes to great extremes to publicize his businesses. So these enterprises are especially visible.
Because of Covid, customers are reduced for hotels for example.
Imagine big loan payments looming. They need a very fast recovery, all stops out.
But even then, it seems likely they'll need more than only a late 2021 recovery.
If they were doing so well as to have large profits enough to accumulate plenty of reserves in the last 10, 15 years...
...then why were Trumps taxes so very, very low for 12 of 15 recent years....?
Only if the example meets similar criteria. It assumes that there IS a cyanide tablet in my medicine, and it assumes guilt on the part of Trump.No it's not. It is refutation by counterexample.
Before I would consider anything as close to a fact I would want to see the original tax returns. The NYT has a history of making news rather than reporting news.
If you have not seen what has been going on for the past 4 years a google search will provide an answer.Okay...
I'm right here. Help me understand it.
Show me your evidence that what YOU say has any regard for truth, and is not just a hit job on the MSM, and I look into who's telling the truth.
The NYT has been sued numerous times. for example Liberty University files $10 million lawsuit against The New York TimesNo. The NTY would not open the publishers up to being sued into oblivion (and yea, verily, beyond).
The lawyers have been over every, single word.
would that include all the stories about Trump and or the Russia fiasco.
That's not relevant to this thread, which is about tax fairness, regarding rich people posting so little tax over time when making huge or middling or weak profits.
And regardless, living large and paying little tax for decades.
Unlike other high income people.
That's a broken tax system unless Trump really isn't making hardly any money and is on the way to another bankruptcy. Even is he is, it's still a broken tax system in my opinion.
It would be better to scrap the income tax entirely and have a national sales tax rich people like Trump can't avoid.