To Cease or to Continue, that is the Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,844
1,311
sg
✟217,541.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Utter garbage.
Those who teach signs and wonders are still for today, in my experience use the whole of scripture from one end to another.
I have walked among such people for the last 50 odd years, and Romans is probably the most popular source of teaching.

Interesting, care to quote which Romans passage they use for that purpose of signs and wonders?

I used romans 8:18-25 plenty of times to correct word of faith believers that the right response to sickness, as advised by Paul, is not to declare “by his stripes we are healed”, but rather to cling on the blessed hope of a future rapture.

And it is at that rapture that we will get our permanent healing.
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,390
823
Califormia
✟134,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Ahh, nice way of distinguishing. If you really follow that principle and its not just an ad-hoc usage, how about John 20:23 then?

Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.

That is present tense right?
As written John 20:23 is for today. Its a hard verse that I struggle with.
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,390
823
Califormia
✟134,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
This was the first sentence:



You must see that you have made 2 different categories of gifts.
The first category is "prophesy".
The second category is "every other gift"

Why is the one continuing, and why is there an exclusion of all others?. It is another "by definition, definition". I am not taking any position, yet, but consistence of interpretation demands that there must be a reason why. according to your belief, that one stays, and eleven cease.

You see, if it is the case that Ephesians supports continuance, then there should likewise be Scriptures to demonstrate the situation of the other 11 Gifts.

As you are presenting it, there is evidence for prophecy continuing in Ephesians 4, but there is silence about the other eleven. Logically, the only thing that silence proves is silence on THAT issue.



What is the basis for your saying "This gift does not cease, but the others do?



Some pertinent questions about that verse:

Where in Ephesians or any of the books Paul wrote is the phrase "until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God "defined"? If there is no definition found, then no one can actually determine if those conditions are wholly met.

And if that is the case, being undefined is true, then those attempting to make a sure statement that that proves...... then that person is essentially arguing from silence, and as I stated earlier, silence on an issue only proves silence on THAT issue.

The same argument as above also skewers this phrase, "attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ." Since it is not defined, there is no one who can say, "it means thus and such"

That leaves the person who is advocating a positive response where a negative situation (nothing defined nor explained) in the position of relying more on wishful thinking than on exegesis of the Word.

I understand that you may not like the reasoning that I expressed, but if I am in error, please demonstrate it, and show it.

BTW I am not attacking any posters. Instead, I am laying out some of the logical traps we fall into if we do not do diligence to logical thoughts and conclusions.
You are trying to make an example out of my post. As we will see later, you should have politely addressed me with respect and spared me the lecture on logical thought and kept quiet on your arguing from silence idiocy:

1. I did not create categories of gifts - for the purpose of argument I addressed one and stated that in my introduction. Fabrication on your part.
2. I did not say one was continuing and the others were not. Fabrication on your part.
3. Again from my intro, I said I would address only 1 gift. It is common in Engineering to focus on one issue at a time - it is the divide and conquer technique. It reduces the number of variables and allows you to better solve an issue. It does not prevent one from later moving to solve other issues. Faulty reasoning assumptions on your part.
4. The true meaning of Ephesians 4:13 is difficult. Although, there are many interpretations, I don't think there are honest ones that are going to say "we all come to the unity of the faith" has been accomplished. If just that part of Ephesians 4:13 has not been kept, then through a chain of reasoning, I conclude that the Gift of Prophecy is for today. I give you partial credit here. I should have used a paragraph to describe this. I don't need to go into great depth as you infer because I am only trying to establish that the Body of Christ has not attained Ephesians 4:13.


My original argument is included below for your convenience:

This is an argument for the continuation of the Gift of Prophecy. I am not arguing about the other Gifts of the Holy Spirit.

In Ephesians 4:11-16, Paul talks about the following 5 ministries within the Church and their overall purpose as a group: Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors, and Teachers.

Ephesians 4:11 So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers, 12 to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up 13 until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ. 14 Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of people in their deceitful scheming. 15 Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ. 16 From him the whole body, joined and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each part does its work.

Ephesians 4:13 indicates the condition under which those 5 ministries would cease. So unless you believe Ephesians 4:13 has been fulfilled, the ministry of the Prophet is still active in the body of Christ. The ministry of the Prophet requires the Gift of Prophecy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JohnT

Regular Member
Oct 27, 2007
823
117
Finger Lakes, NY
✟19,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You are trying to make an example out of my post. As we will see later, you should have politely addressed me with respect and spared me the lecture on logical thought and kept quiet on your arguing from silence idiocy:

You are mistaking an evaluation of the CONTENT of your post as an evaluation of your person. In that, you err. If as an engineer, you create a gizmo, and it does not function as hoped, the fault lies in the gizmo, and it is not your character fault as a person who is its engineer. Make sense?


The purpose of that evaluation was to help you to express your thoughts with out any logical errors. By definition, logical errors automatically invalidate arguments. It is not "idiocy", rather it is a function of rhetoric and logical discourse.

I did not just make those rules, but I try my best to adhere to them.

1. I did not create categories of gifts - for the purpose of argument I addressed one and stated that in my introduction. Fabrication on your part.

I will let you have that one. You made your point, but perhaps did not see mine. Our agreement on that small point is not the same as a stumbling block.

3. Again from my intro, I said I would address only 1 gift. It is common in Engineering to focus on one issue at a time - it is the divide and conquer technique. It reduces the number of variables and allows you to better solve an issue. It does not prevent one from later moving to solve other issues. Faulty reasoning assumptions on your part.

It is understandable that you think that way because it is the way you were educated as a grad student. I was educated to see the whole council of God's word, and to find patterns of consistency, then determine proper doctrine from that.

Thus you focused on the attributes of one of the gifts, and I focused on the whole slate of gifts. I reasoned that if there was anything indicating cessation of any one of them, then for the sake of continuity and consistency there should be evidence for any of the others being ceased. Therein lies the strength of the argument from silence fallacy.

4. The true meaning of Ephesians 4:13 is difficult. Although, there are many interpretations, I don't think there are honest ones that are going to say "we all come to the unity of the faith" has been accomplished. If just that part of Ephesians 4:13 has not been kept, then through a chain of reasoning, I conclude that the Gift of Prophecy is for today. I give you partial credit here. I should have used a paragraph to describe this. I don't need to go into great depth as you infer because I am only trying to establish that the Body of Christ has not attained Ephesians 4:13.

When you think about it, that phrase is ambiguous because Paul did not define it. Consequently we have to supply our own definition, and there really no constraints on our imagination in that case.

Therefore I will not argue on that point. I just identified its weakness: no definition. And then I say "You may be wrong, you may be right." the same applies to me, and move on.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,390
823
Califormia
✟134,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
You are mistaking an evaluation of the CONTENT of your post as an evaluation of your person.
Please answer yes or no. Pastor John, were you or were you not referring to me when you stated the following on a previous post on this thread?

I believe that from what I read, you are dealing with a person with a WoF background, or theology. My experience with those groups is that they doo not have a good understanding of the definition and importance of the word "context", so they will take something like the post to which you refer, and wish to make Scripture say just about anything and then they can "proof text" it saying "See it is in the Bible".

It is my opinion that such persons are well-intentioned dragons posing as sheep. they put on a pious-looking façade while they are spewing unlearned, simplistic heresy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
If you start claiming they were limited to only those present, then you have to adopt the same policy with the whole of scripture.
I disagree.

That's because remnants the gifts had always been there, but illegal, subject to persecution and death, and consequently hidden away from the mainstream.
I've heard them all--the creative, hypothetical scenarios that might explain the decline of the gifts.

None of them holds up to closer examination, least of all the one that says they were present all along but, for some reason, they went unnoticed by anyone who might have made mention of it for posterity. For goodness' sake, we know what people did for underwear in centuries past, but we're supposed to believe that people speaking in tongues didn't raise an eyebrow? Not a chance.
 
Upvote 0

JohnT

Regular Member
Oct 27, 2007
823
117
Finger Lakes, NY
✟19,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Please answer yes or no. Pastor John, were you or were you not referring to me when you stated the following on a previous post on this thread?

Having gone through 12 pages looking for that quote (UGH!) I did not find it, so I cannot answer with certainty. Perhaps you could help me find it. The link you provided did not go to that post you are questioning.

However. based upon my recollections, I believe that I was referring to Guojing because he continually takes Scriptures out of context, and attempts to ignore the surrounding verses. That is a characteristic of the Word of Faith movement, and I have a dislike of ignoring context.

No, I do not dislike the poster, instead, I dislike their theology. The reason for my doing that is by using the same mangling of out of context Scripture, some have managed to "justify suicide" beginning with this snippet, "Judas hung himself..."

I do appreciate your asking because I then have an opportunity to tell you the truth, and erase your fears. But I also recall that that this may be the third time (at the least) that you inferred an insult from me when there was none given, nor intended. Thus, I am not wrong to say that I am concerned about that.

You will see in my posts that I often skewer posts for faulty reasoning, and because I mostly avoid posting "You are..." statements because they tend to be insults, I get concerned when someone picks something that is not there.
 
Upvote 0

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,390
823
Califormia
✟134,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Having gone through 12 pages looking for that quote (UGH!) I did not find it, so I cannot answer with certainty. Perhaps you could help me find it.
Post #208

You do lecture quite a bit and from your own late analysis much of the misunderstanding is brought on by you thinking that your method of thinking is the only valid one. This can trigger one to read into an argument something that was not stated as you have demonstrated. I do know when something is out of context - I do look at the paragraphs before and after the quoted passage - unfortunately from the point of argument the Bible is not mainly written in a topical fashion - so it can be difficult. If someone presses me on discrete examples of error I will address it. I usually won't handle excitable vague accusations or someone completely mischaracterizing what I have said - as was the case in point.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Francis Drake

Returning adventurer.
Apr 14, 2013
4,000
2,508
✟184,952.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Independence-Party
I disagree.


I've heard them all--the creative, hypothetical scenarios that might explain the decline of the gifts.

None of them holds up to closer examination, least of all the one that says they were present all along but, for some reason, they went unnoticed by anyone who might have made mention of it for posterity. For goodness' sake, we know what people did for underwear in centuries past, but we're supposed to believe that people speaking in tongues didn't raise an eyebrow? Not a chance.
So when do you claim it was all restarted then.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Francis Drake

Returning adventurer.
Apr 14, 2013
4,000
2,508
✟184,952.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Independence-Party
Interesting, care to quote which Romans passage they use for that purpose of signs and wonders?

I used romans 8:18-25 plenty of times to correct word of faith believers that the right response to sickness, as advised by Paul, is not to declare “by his stripes we are healed”, but rather to cling on the blessed hope of a future rapture.

And it is at that rapture that we will get our permanent healing.
That's gotta be one hilarious, and very fraudulent answer.
People who suffered years of dreadful diseases, died and rotted in the ground 1000 years ago, are "healed" at a future rapture.
Why didn't Jesus or the apostles preach this instead of all that stupidity of healing people then and there?

That's not healing, its Christians standing around preaching pious garbage but doing nothing while people suffer.
Jesus never did that.
The apostles never did that.
Neither Jesus, nor the apostles told us we would end up doing that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: John Mullally
Upvote 0

ISteveB

Active Member
Sep 17, 2020
302
209
64
Northern Nevada
✟25,434.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I found some definitions from Wiki today, and thought it would be a decent place to express opinions about one's beliefs about the Gifts of Holy Spirit being continued or ceasing. I do request that posters use Scripture in its context to back things up, and also to state "I am just guessing" when you are unsure.

Just as all of us do not have the same gifts, we do not all have the same ministry.

1 Corinthians 12:
4 Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit;
5 and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord;
6 and there are varieties of activities, but it is the same God who empowers them all in everyone.
7 To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.
ESV

Therefore, just I cannot condemn you for being different than me, so also you cannot condemn me for being different than you. However, we ALL must answer to the same Master.

Let's begin!

Cessationism is a Protestant doctrine that spiritual gifts such as speaking in tongues, prophecy and healing ceased with the Apostolic Age. Reformers such as John Calvin originated this view. More recent development has tended to focus on other spiritual gifts too, owing to the advent of Pentecostalism and the Charismatic movement that have popularised a radical continuationism – the position that the spiritual gifts are meant for all Christians in every age.

Continuationism is a Christian theological belief that the spiritual gifts have continued to the present age, specifically those sometimes called[by whom?] "sign gifts",[1] such as tongues and prophecy. Continuationism as a distinct theological position arose in opposition to cessationism.
Well.... as one of the first incidents of a God-moment in my life was a miraculous healing, testified to by the medical doctor who did the surgery on my throat, I'm going to say--
God's been doing what God does for millennia, through to today.

So, is that continuationism?

I'm also a stage four metastatic melanoma cancer survivor, whose doctors have all stated, repeatedly, for over 2 decades, that I am a walking miracle.

I recently read a couple of books about what God is doing around the continent of Asia, and Muslim countries, which describe God raising the dead, convincing people in miraculous ways of his reality, healings, etc....

So... not once have I ever seen anything that would convince me that God is not doing what God has explicitly stated he would do for those who believe him.

After all, according to Malachi 3:6,God never changes. And according to Hebrews 13:8, Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever.

Considering that Hebrews was written in the middle of the first century CE, it seems that yesterday and today was a long time ago and forever includes the past 1950+/- years, into the eternal future.
 
Upvote 0

JohnT

Regular Member
Oct 27, 2007
823
117
Finger Lakes, NY
✟19,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thanks for showing me what I did not see.

Let's deal with facts in their context before we jump to false conclusions because we do not follow the context.

Please look at the header.
Jesus is YHWH said:
I've never heard of such HERESY. The way you twist the scriptures are incredible.

Jesus is YHWH and I go back to another forum. I had three purposes in mind:
  1. I wanted to "scold" him about the use of the inflammatory term "heresy"and because I used the word to describe the post of Guojing...
  2. I wanted to be facetious and very obvious about doing that
  3. I wanted to make a critique about the theology as expressed by Guojing in his posts
Please inform me as to the basis of this outrageous claim:

John Mullally said:
Please answer yes or no. Pastor John, were you or were you not referring to me when you stated the following on a previous post on this thread?

Facts leading to the conclusion below:
  1. Your user name is not in my post in that area.
  2. Your user name is not mentioned in any of the context of the posts by Jesus is YHWH
  3. Your user name is not mentioned in the context of the posts by Guojing
Therefore, the logical conclusion must be that your accusation is utterly a fabrication.
NO, THE POST WAS NOT ABOUT JOHN MULLALLY

DO I need to do anything else to make myself clear?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jesus is YHWH
Upvote 0

JohnT

Regular Member
Oct 27, 2007
823
117
Finger Lakes, NY
✟19,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You do lecture quite a bit and from your own late analysis much of the misunderstanding is brought on by you thinking that your method of thinking is the only valid one.

More mis-characterizations. I write in the manner that I do to convince others. It is the nature of logical discussion to analyze and rebut as vigorously and logically as one can do. No discussions are won by assuming a non-existent personal attack or by saying "I do not like the way that you write."

This can trigger one to read into an argument something that was not stated as you have demonstrated

In other words, you seem to be blaming me for your feeling attacked. is that the case? In reality, I am not responsible for how you feel, but I am responsible for acting in a Christ-like manner. Only in your imagination, as expressed by your words did I ever "attack you". That is a true statement.

I usually won't handle excitable vague accusations or someone completely mischaracterizing what I have said - as was the case in point.

The evidence from my posts do not support that accusation, therefore (and I say this factually, not meanly) you really do not have a "case in point", John. THAT is not an insult, and it is the closest I will ever get to an insult. That is also a true statement.

Do you have anything more to say about the gifts ceasing, or not?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jesus is YHWH
Upvote 0

dms1972

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 26, 2013
5,086
1,305
✟596,524.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Cessationism is a Protestant doctrine that spiritual gifts such as speaking in tongues, prophecy and healing ceased with the Apostolic Age. Reformers such as John Calvin originated this view. More recent development has tended to focus on other spiritual gifts too, owing to the advent of Pentecostalism and the Charismatic movement that have popularised a radical continuationism – the position that the spiritual gifts are meant for all Christians in every age.

I think what some now call concentric cessationism is what was held by some of the Reformers, and still by some today. Concentric implies circles within which varying degrees of the extraordinary gifts still operate. I would suppose though I have not seen it systematised, that in the innermost circle the church is fully mature and not in need of the extra-ordinary gifts, and in the outer circles there is more need of building up and more gifts are in operation. Perhaps in unreached areas, or outreach to foreign tribes - miracles could still be part of the gifts of the Holy Spirit in those contexts.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jesus is YHWH
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,844
1,311
sg
✟217,541.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's gotta be one hilarious, and very fraudulent answer.
People who suffered years of dreadful diseases, died and rotted in the ground 1000 years ago, are "healed" at a future rapture.
Why didn't Jesus or the apostles preach this instead of all that stupidity of healing people then and there?

That's not healing, its Christians standing around preaching pious garbage but doing nothing while people suffer.
Jesus never did that.
The apostles never did that.
Neither Jesus, nor the apostles told us we would end up doing that.

Firstly, the rapture of the Body of Christ is a secret that was first revealed by the Apostle Paul (1 Corinthians 15:51). Christ knew about it of course during the 4 gospels time period, but he did not reveal that secret during his first coming on Earth.

More importantly, you originally said my point is utter rubbish and that Romans is popularly used by preachers to teach us signs and wonders are still here today.

Yet, when I ask you directly which part of Romans they use to do that, you don't want to answer?
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,844
1,311
sg
✟217,541.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I disagree.


I've heard them all--the creative, hypothetical scenarios that might explain the decline of the gifts.

None of them holds up to closer examination, least of all the one that says they were present all along but, for some reason, they went unnoticed by anyone who might have made mention of it for posterity. For goodness' sake, we know what people did for underwear in centuries past, but we're supposed to believe that people speaking in tongues didn't raise an eyebrow? Not a chance.

I think most would agree that the gift of apostleship, that Paul mentioned before in 1 Corinthians 12:28, has ceased for today.

If you follow strictly the criteria to be an apostle, you have to witness the resurrected Christ 1 Corinthians 9:1, you have to perform signs and wonders of an apostle 2 Corinthians 12:12, all these will disqualify anyone who claim to be an apostle today.

Since that gift has ceased without being explicitly stated in the Bible, it is not that difficult to conclude that there might be other gifts, in that list 1 Corinthians 12:28, that has also ceased without being explicitly mentioned.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

John Mullally

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2020
2,390
823
Califormia
✟134,002.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Please inform me as to the basis of this outrageous claim:
I had just completed a long back and forth with Jesus is YHWH and at an impasse he stated that he was willing to examine a teacher of my choice if I would watch John McArthur videos. I stated anything from Kenneth Hagin - the father of WoF.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.