coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,005
2,817
Australia
✟157,641.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Coffee<< Now the Lord God had formed
Had,
he had formed all the animals in Genesis 1. In Genesis 2 he is bringing the animals to Adam for him to name, he isn't creating them. >>


What verse are you quoting when you say "had formed"? I can't discuss tenses until you point to a specific verse.

I quoted back part of the same verse that you quoted to me! I copied some of it right off your own post.

Genesis 2
19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,178
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟664,282.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I quoted back part of the same verse that you quoted to me! I copied some of it right off your own post.

Genesis 2
19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.


Very well, sorry for the confusion. Here is Young's Literal Translation for the same verse.

19 And Jehovah God formeth from the ground every beast of the field, and every fowl of the heavens, and bringeth in unto the man, to see what he doth call it; and whatever the man calleth a living creature, that [is] its name.
Genesis 2:19 YLT


In the YLT we see that "God formeth" the beasts and birds. It is in the present tense in a literal translation. The "had" indicating past tense in other translations is an intrusion by the translators.
 
Upvote 0

ewq1938

I love you three.
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
44,418
6,800
✟916,399.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Very well, sorry for the confusion. Here is Young's Literal Translation for the same verse.

19 And Jehovah God formeth from the ground every beast of the field, and every fowl of the heavens, and bringeth in unto the man, to see what he doth call it; and whatever the man calleth a living creature, that [is] its name.
Genesis 2:19 YLT


In the YLT we see that "God formeth" the beasts and birds. It is in the present tense in a literal translation. The "had" indicating past tense in other translations is an intrusion by the translators.

Yes this is true as the Hebrew manuscripts have the imperfect tense because the forming was not complete but being actively accomplished so indeed God was forming animals in front of Adam to name not bring him previously formed animals.
 
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,005
2,817
Australia
✟157,641.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Animals were made before Adam.

Genesis 1
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.


25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.


26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

Genesis 2 is not the order of creation, it is a looking back at what was done and a deeper look at the garden, probably by another author with a different perspective.

 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,586
731
56
Ohio US
✟150,018.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Animals were made before Adam.
I don't think anyone is disputing that. Or saying God wiped out the creation of the 7th days. There are some, as I believe as well, that God created men and women on the 6th day and that he rested and then he formed Adam (specific man Adam, not mankind as he did on the 6th) and Eve and it was through their specific bloodline that Christ would come from. And that is why she is called the mother of all "living".

You can't get around the fact that sea life and certain wild animals were created before men and women. And the fact that God created certain animals after the Adam of the garden. These are different types of animals.

Plus, it makes no sense that later on Cain went to the land of Nod (lands were usually named after the people that founded them back then) and was able to find a wife unless people were already on the earth at that time. He left the presence of the Lord so I doubt he was allowed to stick around marry a sister years later. That's not biblical. Although I realize that's what many believe and still will. But if one lets the word read as it should (taking it back to the Hebrew) it all makes sense and there are no contradictions.

probably by another author with a different perspective.

The manuscripts didn't have chapters, so I highly doubt there was a second author of this letter. Which also lends imo that Gen 2 is adding after the account of Gen 1, not wiping it out. Because why would there be the same creation account given and then immediately another one given that has contradictions to the first?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ewq1938
Upvote 0

Philip_B

Bread is Blessed & Broken Wine is Blessed & Poured
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2016
5,412
5,519
72
Swansea, NSW, Australia
Visit site
✟609,347.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The manuscripts didn't have chapters, so I highly doubt there was a second author of this letter. Which also lends imo that Gen 2 is adding after the account of Gen 1, not wiping it out. Because why would there be the same creation account given and then immediately another one given that has contradictions to the first?

The proposition is not so much that there were two authors so much as that there were two oral traditions which have been recorded, and maintained with some integrity, rather than some sort of artificial harmonising of the record. Stories of origin are common in most parts of humanity and they serve the purpose of helping people understand their identity. The Genesis Accounts are about being God's people, and tell us more about God rather than being a National Geographic account of the events. imho.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,005
2,817
Australia
✟157,641.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't think anyone is disputing that. Or saying God wiped out the creation of the 7th days.

I have had people on here argue for that very thing, stating that dinosaurs and ape-men were from the first creation and then there was this gap of millions of years so that they could tie in evolutionary science and then God supposedly created again, ontop of it.
That ^ is what the majority who say there were two creations mean. Now not to say that every single person here saying two creations means that, but that has been my experience.

There are some, as I believe as well, that God created men and women on the 6th day and that he rested and then he formed Adam (specific man Adam, not mankind as he did on the 6th) and Eve and it was through their specific bloodline that Christ would come from. And that is why she is called the mother of all "living".

All people came from Adam and Eve, if not they are not included in this verse.
Romans 5:12
Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned--

Adam sinned, his sin was passed down to his children, who passed it to their children and so on to all of us. Which is why we all sin and why we all need a saviour. He only had children with Eve, no one else. Hense she is literally mother to all of us.

You can't get around the fact that sea life and certain wild animals were created before men and women. And the fact that God created certain animals after the Adam of the garden. These are different types of animals.

Who says sea life was created after people? Sea creatures and birds were created on day 5, land animals and people on day 6.
God did not create any animals after Adam.
19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name.
God had previously created them on day 5 and before the man on day 6.

I don't know why anyone has an issue with the author looking back on what had been done previously. Do you not ever do that? Do you not tell someone "That time we went to..." or whatever it is. I look back on things frequently. God made the animals early on day 6, in chapter 2 he is simply bringing them before Adam for him to name them.

Plus, it makes no sense that later on Cain went to the land of Nod (lands were usually named after the people that founded them back then) and was able to find a wife

He didn't find a wife in Nod. He took his wife with him to Nod. His wife was his sister or possibly a niece.
Oh yes, they married their relatives as there was no law against it at that time. This may hurt our modern sensibilities but it was quite normal back then. Even Abraham was married to his half-sister and some time had passed by then.

unless people were already on the earth at that time. He left the presence of the Lord so I doubt he was allowed to stick around marry a sister years later. That's not biblical. Although I realize that's what many believe that and still will. But if one lets the word read as it should (taking it back to the Hebrew) it all makes sense and there are no contradictions.

A young fertile couple commanded to be fruitful and multiply with no birth control and years ahead of them. Adam died at 930, how many children do you think he and Eve may have had? Dozens. Cain would have had plenty of sisters to choose from.

The manuscripts didn't have chapters, so I highly doubt there was a second author of this letter. Which also lends imo that Gen 2 is adding after the account of Gen 1, not wiping it out. Because why would there be the same creation account given and then immediately another one given that has contradictions to the first?

Because there are no contradictions. The author is looking at the garden. God planted cultivated crops and brought the animals he had made before Adam for him to name them, that and a deeper look into how he made Eve is all Genesis 2 contains. It is not giving you the order of creation because that was covered in Genesis 1. As to the author that is not a hard known fact. While it probably Moses, Gen 2 may have been a different author and even if it was not, does that matter?
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In the first creation story, Genesis 1, plants are created on the third day.

11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.
Genesis 1:11-13 NIV

Still in the first creation story, God creates fish, sea creatures and birds on the fifth day.

20 And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.” 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.” 23 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fifth day.
Genesis 1: 20-23 NIV

Then God creates land animals and an undetermined number of people on the sixth day.

24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.”
And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
27 So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”
Genesis 1: 24-28 NIV

The second creation account starts in Genesis 2:4.

4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.
Genesis 2:4 NIV

We are specifically told that there is "no shrub" and "no plant" when Adam, the first man, is created.

5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, 6 but streams came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground. 7 Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
Genesis 2:5-7 NIV

The second creation story gives the impression that plants are made to make Adam comfortable. The tenses here are confusing and I'll say more about that later.

8 Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Genesis 2:8-9 NIV

In the first creation story, birds (and fish) are created before land animals while in the second creation story, land animals and birds are created at the same time. In the first story, plants and animals are created before people while in the second, Adam is created before plants and animals. Again, the creation of animals is related to Adam's comfort, since the text distinguishes between "livestock" and "wild animals." The creation of land animals and birds is closely connected with their presentation to Adam.

19 Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.
Genesis 2:19-20 NIV

God announces the intention to create Eve, to create the first woman, in verse 18. He does not actually do so until verses 21-23, after the creation and presentation of birds, livestock and wild animals.

18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”
...
21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman,’
for she was taken out of man.”
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.
25 Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.
Genesis 2:18-25 NIV


In summary, in the first creation story, God creates plants, then animals, then people. In the second creation story, God first creates the man, Adam, then plants, then animals, and then the woman, Eve. Each of these stories has its purpose but as literal story they can't be reconciled.

I Genesis One we see "and God saw." God was creating and seeing the finished result. God had all the plants ready to sprout, but God saw the end result as he made them ready. "God saw" ... God saw."

In Genesis Two... Now we can see what it is.

Genesis One. God created *bara* out from nothing many things. "Bara!"

In Genesis Two, God had finished creating out from nothing. There was no more creating by God in that manner! Look here....


Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating *bara* that he had done.

When we start Genesis Two it begins by telling us that God rested from all the *bara* He had done in Genesis One! No more "creating out from nothing!" God does no more creating "bara" in Genesis Two. Instead he took what he had created in Genesis One (earth) and from it He "molded and formed" (jatsar) a body for the human soul He had created (bara) in Genesis 1:27!


"So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them."


Created = *bara.* "Created out from nothing!"


That was the invisible human soul that God in His ability could see! The souls were created 'out from nothing!' No body was yet provided for that soul until we see Genesis Two.

In Genesis Two? It says that no more creating anything out from nothing! God rested from creating that way.

Genesis Two was God's next phase for what He had already created in Genesis One.

Hope that helps. Without understanding the Hebrew meanings? The English translations can get crazy confusing and leave us in the dark.


grace and peace
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have had people on here argue for that very thing, stating that dinosaurs and ape-men were from the first creation and then there was this gap of millions of years" so that they could tie in evolutionary science and then God supposedly created again, ontop of it.


God is going to replace this world too.

This world will become the next prehistoric world to those alive in the next new heavens and earth. The lion will eat grass. Evolution? No. God will change everything in a split second. This creation will be remembered no more!

“See, I will create
new heavens and a new earth.
The former things will not be remembered,

nor will they come to mind." Isa 65:17​

Our world will be replaced by a new world, and this one will not even come to mind.

We are living in what will some day be called prehistoric times.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,178
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟664,282.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I Genesis One we see "and God saw." God was creating and seeing the finished result. God had all the plants ready to sprout, but God saw the end result as he made them ready. "God saw" ... God saw."

In Genesis Two... Now we can see what it is.

Genesis One. God created *bara* out from nothing many things. "Bara!"

In Genesis Two, God had finished creating out from nothing. There was no more creating by God in that manner! Look here....


Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating *bara* that he had done.

When we start Genesis Two it begins by telling us that God rested from all the *bara* He had done in Genesis One! No more "creating out from nothing!" God does no more creating "bara" in Genesis Two. Instead he took what he had created in Genesis One (earth) and from it He "molded and formed" (jatsar) a body for the human soul He had created (bara) in Genesis 1:27!


"So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them."


Created = *bara.* "Created out from nothing!"


That was the invisible human soul that God in His ability could see! The souls were created 'out from nothing!' No body was yet provided for that soul until we see Genesis Two.

In Genesis Two? It says that no more creating anything out from nothing! God rested from creating that way.

Genesis Two was God's next phase for what He had already created in Genesis One.

Hope that helps. Without understanding the Hebrew meanings? The English translations can get crazy confusing and leave us in the dark.


grace and peace



Genez,

Hello, since I don't remember talking to you before.

Genez: "The souls were created 'out from nothing!' No body was yet provided for that soul until we see Genesis Two."

This is a far-fetched interpretation. The obvious meaning of the text is that when God created men and women, He created them both body and soul. The text doesn't make the body/soul distinction that you are making. This is particularly true since God gives life to Adam by breathing in the Breath of Life in Genesis 2, so God gives Adam a soul at that point. If God made a soul for Adam's body in Chapter 1 and then breathed a soul into Adam in Chapter 2, then God would have created a soul for Adam twice.

Are souls male and female? I don't believe they are, it is bodies that are male or female. It would make no sense for God to create male and female in Genesis 1 if He is creating souls instead of bodies.

Besides, take a look at Genesis 1:28.

God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground..”
Genesis 1:28 NIV

God creates mankind in His own image in verse 27, then in verse 28 He tells them to be fruitful and multiply. Souls can't multiply, so this only makes sense if God creates men and women with bodies in Genesis 1:27.

In Genesis 2:4 we enter a second creation account.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,178
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟664,282.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I Genesis One we see "and God saw." God was creating and seeing the finished result. God had all the plants ready to sprout, but God saw the end result as he made them ready. "God saw" ... God saw."

In Genesis Two... Now we can see what it is.

Genesis One. God created *bara* out from nothing many things. "Bara!"

In Genesis Two, God had finished creating out from nothing. There was no more creating by God in that manner! Look here....


Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating *bara* that he had done.

When we start Genesis Two it begins by telling us that God rested from all the *bara* He had done in Genesis One! No more "creating out from nothing!" God does no more creating "bara" in Genesis Two. Instead he took what he had created in Genesis One (earth) and from it He "molded and formed" (jatsar) a body for the human soul He had created (bara) in Genesis 1:27!


"So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them."


Created = *bara.* "Created out from nothing!"


That was the invisible human soul that God in His ability could see! The souls were created 'out from nothing!' No body was yet provided for that soul until we see Genesis Two.

In Genesis Two? It says that no more creating anything out from nothing! God rested from creating that way.

Genesis Two was God's next phase for what He had already created in Genesis One.

Hope that helps. Without understanding the Hebrew meanings? The English translations can get crazy confusing and leave us in the dark.


grace and peace


Genez: "Genesis One. God created *bara* out from nothing many things. "Bara!"
In Genesis Two, God had finished creating out from nothing. There was no more creating by God in that manner!"



This doesn't work out either. Take a look at the passage where God creates the sky.

So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so.
God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
Genesis 1:7-8 NIV

The Hebrew word for "made" here is " 'asah " (not bara).


Again, take a look at Genesis 1:16.

God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.
Genesis 1:16 NIV

The Hebrew word for "made" here is " 'asah " (not bara).

The word 'asah continues to appear in Genesis 2.
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Genez,

Hello, since I don't remember talking to you before.

Genez: "The souls were created 'out from nothing!' No body was yet provided for that soul until we see Genesis Two."

This is a far-fetched interpretation. The obvious meaning of the text is that when God created men and women, He created them both body and soul. The text doesn't make the body/soul distinction that you are making.

So you accept that God created two different races of man? One was created. One was not.


Traditional thinking does not trump sound exegesis. Traditional thinking held to the idea that the world had to be flat. To think its round was "far fetched."


Learn the Hebrew in how it was used. Who can teach you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Genez: "Genesis One. God created *bara* out from nothing many things. "Bara!"
In Genesis Two, God had finished creating out from nothing. There was no more creating by God in that manner!"



This doesn't work out either. Take a look at the passage where God creates the sky.

So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so.
God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
Genesis 1:7-8 NIV

The Hebrew word for "made" here is " 'asah " (not bara).

What would we have if God did not breath into the nostrils of the body in Genesis 2?

Would you have a man?

It does not say that God created the sky. He made the sky out from what had already been created. That is why it does not say "bara." It says instead, 'asah.' That is to let the serious students of the Bible know what was taking place.

Not everything in Genesis One is "bara." Its in Genesis Two we no longer see "bara." Nothing was 'created out from nothing' in Genesis Two.

Its quite simple as long as traditional dogma-bias does not get in the way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Then we would just all be mouth breathers.
Or, just sound like one?

The Lord breathed soul life into Adam's body.

The soul of man was created in the image of God. The body is our biological "machine" God provided to navigate the created material world with.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Or, just sound like one?

The Lord breathed soul life into Adam's body.

The soul of man was created in the image of God. The body is our biological "machine" God provided to navigate the created material world with.
Actually I was just posting a humorous reply.
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Actually I was just posting a humorous reply.
I was hoping it was.

I was also hoping for a true answer.

If the Lord did not breath the soul (a soul that was created "out from nothing" (in Genesis 1:27), we would not have a man. We would only have a lifeless body for a man's soul.

The point was, there were not two different creation accounts. It's all about how this creation came into being in stages.

Sad part .. I have seen some using the two creations of man theory for proclaiming white supremacy. So, its not to be taken lightly.

Genesis 1:27 also reveals that God created male and female souls. So, in the resurrection we will still have male and females, but no more sexual reproduction.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I was hoping it was.

I was also hoping for a true answer.

If the Lord did not breath the soul (a soul that was created "out from nothing" (in Genesis 1:27), we would not have a man. We would only have a lifeless body for a man's soul.

The point was, there were not two different creation accounts. It's all about how this creation came into being in stages.

Sad part .. I have seen some using the two creations of man theory for proclaiming white supremacy. So, its not to be taken lightly.

Genesis 1:27 also reveals that God created male and female souls. So, in the resurrection we will still have male and females, but no more sexual reproduction.
And as I said, it was intended to be humorous. I thought that was obvious. If you want a serious reply you will have to get it from someone else.

As I also said, I regard the two differing creation accounts as allegories.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
And as I said, it was intended to be humorous. I thought that was obvious. If you want a serious reply you will have to get it from someone else.

As I also said, I regard the two differing creation accounts as allegories.

OK.... thanks for saving me time.


Looks like your eternal reward will be a book of allegories.

An autographed copy, of course! :angel:
 
Upvote 0